User talk:Tomica: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:15, 23 January 2014

Skip to table of contents

This is Tomica's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66: 20 days

Talkback

Hello, Tomica. You have new messages at Rayman95's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gibpedia

'Gibraltarpedia in an international and multi-cultural collaboration'

Welcome Tomica, contributions in Macedonian or any language is useful ..

We would like to invite you to contribute to the GibraltarpediA project, the world's first Wikipedia City. The project needs writers, photographers, translators and others to help build the first wiki city which bridges Europe and Africa. We are going to transform Gibraltar and the surrounding areas in Morocco and Spain into areas rich with encyclopedic content immediately accessible using QR codes and NFC on plaques for visitors and local people.

There are prizes to reward contributors in the Gibraltarpedia Multilingual challenge for the best editors, photographs and cartographers... whoever you are. More at Gibraltarpedia.org

'Gibraltarpedia in an international and muli-cultural collaboration'

Helping request

Hi there, Tomica. At first, I want to say Happy New Year to you, as I wish sometimes we could work together on Wikipedia. I really need your help on List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of 2013. At the list's FLC page, a contributor said that the list was a fork from List of Billboard Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2010s according to criteria 3b of FLs. I tried to explain but I just don't know how (the same thing happened to my FLC of the 2012 list). Do you have any opinions about this? — Simon (talk) 08:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rated R GAN

I haven't seen any improvement since I posted the review. prism △ 14:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was not at home for 4 days. I will fix the issues in the upcoming days. Thanks for the great review! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 14:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, though Aaron also listed himself as nominator of the article. :) Thank you! prism △ 14:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of No Love Allowed

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article No Love Allowed you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nobody's Business (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nobody's Business (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of No Love Allowed

The article No Love Allowed you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:No Love Allowed for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Nobody's Business (song)

The article Nobody's Business (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nobody's Business (song) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling music artists

Beyoncé Knowles has sold 118 million records as a solo artist^[1], and an additional 60 million records with Destiny's Child^[2], totaling 168 million records sold, placing her at the top of the "120 million to 199 million records" category under this specific Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaknowitall (talk • contribs) 22:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can't Remember to Forget You

Hi Tomica! You being a member of Wikiproject Rihanna, and me being a member of Wikiproject Shakira, I think we should shake our hands and work together on "Can't Remember to Forget You". Initially I decided not to work on it since I wasn't very excited about it, but after hearing it I can't get it out of my brain, it's just that pop rock vibe that gets me. Are you interested in collaborating? Remember that we'll have to tolerate a lot of unwanted IP and careless user edits, and probably a genre war. I hope to work with you soon --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw your comment about how you hate everything about Rihanna. And yeah as I already said to Wiki Redactor too I am here for collaboration on the article of course:). I like it also... It's a great combination of Reggae Pop and Pop Rock. Love how the vocals blend together perfectly! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 17:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Surprising I liked Rihanna's vocals in this song, so maybe I was hasty in my opinion regarding her. Nevertheless this song is great and deserves a great article on Wikipedia, which hopefully we can provide it with. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 17:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Her vocals slay here, they sound so tender. That's her power, she can provide different types of vocals for each song; compare this song to "The Monster", you will see what I mean. And yeah, we will give the best to make the article awesome. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 17:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right now the IPs are busy adding a truck load of messy information. So I believe we should wait for them to have their fun, and then move in and clear the trashy bits. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Let them having fun a bit xD. Then we gonna attack with the clean up and adding stuff:). — Tomíca^(T2ME) 18:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like soldiers --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rated R GAN (2)

Are you still busy? I can cancel it if you want to. prism △ 18:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please cancel it. I will re-work some aspects of the article when I am free and then re-nominate it ;). — Tomíca^(T2ME) 18:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! prism △ 18:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rated R (Rihanna album)

The article Rated R (Rihanna album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rated R (Rihanna album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prism -- Prism (talk) 18:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

How are you? — ₳aron 12:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How are both you? Miss you a lot. I am doing much effort to be more active here lately. Hope to see you both around as well. If only Wikipedia could become how it was in 2011 again!!! Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I am fine, how about both of you? And yeah, I agree, Wikipedia has changed, our life too, I personally don't have much time and also lost interest in editing tbh. I just come here and there to check things. 2011 was an epic Wiki year :). — Tomíca^(T2ME) 13:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine, thanks. Yes Tom, I really miss that time. I really try to regenerate my interest for editing but it seems like I cannot pull it back again. Anyway, how were your exams? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:09, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Me too, it's not the same on here anymore :( — ₳aron 13:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Explanations/Dismissal

Please do not be so dismissive of explanations given. Also, my edit summary at "Hummingbird Heartbeat" had nothing to do with it being a single or staying. I explained on the talk page how there was poorly sourced info and unnecessary repetitions of content. It also had redundant uses of citations. It feels like you're just making excuses to revert me. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not making excuses to revert you, it's just you are making stupid edits to the article. Removing Russel's pic ? Why? It can PERFECTLY stay! And also why removing sources and what's the problem with them? I can't see it. Just stop the whole drama you want to start. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 15:47, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was not looking to start drama. Please don't call edits "stupid"- that's just plain condescending and rude. The pic is unneeded for the following reasons:

He did not contribute any lyrics, vocals, instruments, production, or anything at all. Better to have a picture of someone who contributed to song.
He has not performed any covers of the song, would be better to have pics of the song being performed
It is redundant to say "was based on" or "was about" twice, which is what the photo caption was stating. Since that is all the info there is regarding him on this, a pic of him is just redundant.

"PopCrush" is not at all a reliable source. It is known for often fabricating information and often poorly supporting claims. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:56, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Crush is a perfectly reliable for GA's, and it's not reliable for FA's! And for the pic (LOL LOL LOL) those reasons are plain non-sense, because a picture of whatever significant to the song could be included. Katy wrote the song for Russel and his picture can PERFECTLY stay in the article. So don't try to bossy up on the article. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 16:01, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how a source is reliable if info it gives is often false. I wasn't trying to "bossy up" the article, though it isn't GA. Please don't laugh at reasons others give for things. It is rude, dismissive, unneeded, patronizing, and arrogant. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 16:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And still this is my talk page. So bye! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 16:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tomica, while I agree that this is your talk page, referring to another user's edits as "stupid" isn't necessary, especially since XXSNUGGUMSXX is much more communicative than they used to be. In addition, coming to someone's talk page and discussing rather than continuing to revert was a piece of advice that I gave to XXSNUGGUMSXX, which they have followed; I'd rather them not end up feeling uncomfortable about something I recommended to them (and I say all of this as someone who has had disputes with XXSNUGGUMSXX in the past, but has since resolved those differences). Three months ago, I started a discussion on the article's talk page here, but it did not receive much response; would you consider participating there, please? It would be best for this to be resolved once and for all, rather than the slow-moving reverts continue. Thanks. Acalamari 17:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hi. I see to be being bullied by an editor with far more clout than me on Wikipedia. I was reverted here (without a legitimate edit summary) for revising the prose to adhere to WP:CHERRY-PICKING, and the editor did not show good faith when he reverted my civil message to him here. And now I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place. Dan56 (talk) 23:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-gradual-success-helped-beyonce-28-01-2010/

[2] ttp://entertainment.time.com/2013/01/11/beyonce-and-destinys-child-to-release-original-track-for-first-time-in-eight-years/

[1]

[2]

@@ Line 127: / Line 127: @@
 :::::And still this is my talk page. So bye! — <span style="text-shadow:#CCC 0.1em 0.3em 0.3em; font-family: Trebuchet MS;font-size: 10pt">[[User:Tomica|<font color="#2861B2">'''Tomíca'''</font >]][[User talk:Tomica|<sup><font color="#2861B2">(T2ME)</font></sup>]]</span> 16:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 ::::::Hi Tomica, while I agree that this is your talk page, referring to another user's edits as "stupid" isn't necessary, especially since XXSNUGGUMSXX is much more communicative than they used to be. In addition, coming to someone's talk page and discussing rather than continuing to revert was a piece of advice that I gave to XXSNUGGUMSXX, which they have followed; I'd rather them not end up feeling uncomfortable about something I recommended to them (and I say all of this as someone who has had disputes with XXSNUGGUMSXX in the past, but has since resolved those differences). Three months ago, I started a discussion on the article's talk page [[Talk:Hummingbird_Heartbeat#The_dispute|here]], but it did not receive much response; would you consider participating there, please? It would be best for this to be resolved once and for all, rather than the slow-moving reverts continue. Thanks. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 17:49, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
+== Help ==
+Hi. I see to be being bullied by an editor with far more clout than me on Wikipedia. I was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...And_Justice_for_All_(album)&diff=prev&oldid=592092167 reverted here (without a legitimate edit summary)] for revising the prose to adhere to WP:CHERRY-PICKING, and the editor did not show good faith when he reverted my civil message to him [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GabeMc&diff=prev&oldid=592092797 here]. And now I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place. [[User:Dan56|Dan56]] ([[User talk:Dan56|talk]]) 23:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)