User talk:Lineslarge: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:41, 1 February 2014

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Lineslarge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Numansdorp. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 09:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Rollback is granted
It is a powerful tool
Please use carefully.

An optimist on the run! 22:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

With compliments. Mootros (talk) 17:58, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Childbirth

Hello, it's not the usefulness of the reference or external link that's really the issue, it's their reliability. That reference is not a good source for a medical article since we strongly prefer journal articles, and I suspect that the person who added it had a conflict of interest. However, the "Signs" section seemed a little empty to me and as it turns out, it used to contain a lot more text, so I've restored the information that used to be there, since it's mostly well-sourced. Regarding the video, there is no authorship information on it and it could be a copyright violation, which should not be linked. A person using many IP addresses has been adding the link to various articles like this, this and this. I figure that if somebody is so desperate to get their links onto Wikipedia that they have to resort to tactics like that, something must be very wrong; also no long-term editors have ever added links to that site. Feel free to add a link to another childbirth video that isn't a copyright violation; anything from a large reputable organisation like the National Institutes of Health, the National Health Service or the Mayo Clinic would be fine. Graham87 02:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Locust

I've deleted the information because it is superfluous, as I explained on the Talk page of the article. Your accusation of vandalism is quite irritating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.78.191.236 (talk) 20:37, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

64, I think you may have misread your talk page. Lineslarge last commented on your page on June 30 to warn you about vandalism on a different article. I am the only one who has contacted you regarding your deletion of the table on locust. Your edit was not vandalism and is not being perceived that way. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 20:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Computer Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CITP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pudding cloth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lineslarge. You have new messages at EvergreenFir's talk page.
Message added 21:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

EvergreenFir (talk) 21:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lineslarge this is CatCars.

Who are you?

"Your recent edit to Car check seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now"

Are you GOD? How arrogant a statement is the above.