User talk:Stuart Bannerman: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:08, 2 June 2014

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!Template:Z129

Rose (Film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rose (Film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2005331/plotsummary.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Rose (Film)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 16:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Rose (Film), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 18:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rose (Film)

Thank you Marianian. Even if I am the one who submitted the IMDB summary in the first place? I can reword the Wiki one if itll stop me from having this page deleted :(

Hi, it doesn't look like there is anything against creating an article about the film, but it has to be in your own words, instead of cutting and pasting from external sources. --Marianian^(talk) 18:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was querying whether the person who wrote the IMDB page would be able to replicate it here. Without looking at my exact quote which is on another page. I believe I said something along the lines of 'even If i were the one who wrote the IMDB summary'

I am not financially connected with the film but do have permission from the filmmakers to (hopefully) set up this Wiki page to help generate talk about it. It deals with a very real subject and this isnt for financial reasons. I am a film reviewer and always manage to keep an unbiased view on any film that I chat about. Whilst I will admit that I am new to Wikipedia, I am stunned by the level of edits that I have faced and the sheer difficulty of setting up a page about a motion picture.

I have totally written the plot summary on the Rose Wiki page (and had done before you sent the last message) so its 100 % in my own words. I will (if the page remains) be adding links and sources, But am new to Wiki and am learning how to format the page.....

Conflict of interest

Stuart, I note that in several places (here, with your claim of having written the IMDb plot summary for Rose, and on User talk:Nthep) you have claimed a connection to Rose (a film you have worked on). Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. Users are discouraged (although not outright forbidden) from writing about topics to which they are closely connected, because of the difficulty of maintaining a neutral point of view. Also, you have claimed that you should be allowed to repost the plot summary from IMDb to Wikipedia because you are the person who originally wrote it. Unfortunately, in general (and I can't access IMDb from my work PC to verify this for that site), any material you write and submit to a site such as IMDb becomes the property of that site -- you lose your personal claim of copyright ownership. Thus, you are not allowed to copy the text verbatim from that site to here. Also, we have only your word as to the veracity of that claim anyway -- we really have no way of knowing if you truly are the person who wrote the IMDb synopsis. Your best bet is to just rewrite the synopsis in your own words. That won't guarantee that the article remains: there is still the notability issue. I noted on the Eileen Daly page that either she or the film won an award (the Van Gogh Award at the Amsterdam Film Festival). Although Wikipedia does not have an article on either the Van Gogh Award or the Amsterdam Film Festival, the award may have been covered in some press that might be a source of significant coverage as required by Wikipedia. Other than that, I'm not able to find any evidence of coverage, although I'll admit to the difficulty of searching for a title as generic as Rose. If you have sources that indicate significant coverage, please add them to the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]