User talk:Stuart Bannerman

Is there any update on whether the Rose (film) page will go live.? I hope so as it does look pretty good and all the information is accurate

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Rose (Film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rose (Film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2005331/plotsummary.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Rose (Film)

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 16:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Rose (Film), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 18:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The film is already out there, as are a host of interviews etc, which I will hopefully link to in the page. I began constructing this page earlier today and in no way is it finished. I am learning how to format and add links etc. I will be adding more links tomorrow. And so forth.

Rose (Film)

Thank you Marianian. Even if I am the one who submitted the IMDB summary in the first place? I can reword the Wiki one if itll stop me from having this page deleted :(

Hi, it doesn't look like there is anything against creating an article about the film, but it has to be in your own words, instead of cutting and pasting from external sources. --Marianian^(talk) 18:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was querying whether the person who wrote the IMDB page would be able to replicate it here. Without looking at my exact quote which is on another page. I believe I said something along the lines of 'even If i were the one who wrote the IMDB summary'

I am not financially connected with the film but do have permission from the filmmakers to (hopefully) set up this Wiki page to help generate talk about it. It deals with a very real subject and this isnt for financial reasons. I am a film reviewer and always manage to keep an unbiased view on any film that I chat about. Whilst I will admit that I am new to Wikipedia, I am stunned by the level of edits that I have faced and the sheer difficulty of setting up a page about a motion picture.

I have totally written the plot summary on the Rose Wiki page (and had done before you sent the last message) so its 100 % in my own words. I will (if the page remains) be adding links and sources, But am new to Wiki and am learning how to format the page.....

It is not the purpose of Wikipedia to "generate talk" about topics (see WP:Promotion). It is the purpose of Wikipedia to create articles on topics that have already generated talk, so that there are reliable sources from which to draw. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:17, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A side note: You don't need permission from filmmakers to write a Wikipedia article about their film (unless you are intending to include any intellectual property of theirs in the article, in which case you'd need to see WP:Donating copyrighted materials). —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Stuart, I note that in several places (here, with your claim of having written the IMDb plot summary for Rose, and on User talk:Nthep) you have claimed a connection to Rose (a film you have worked on). Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. Users are discouraged (although not outright forbidden) from writing about topics to which they are closely connected, because of the difficulty of maintaining a neutral point of view. Also, you have claimed that you should be allowed to repost the plot summary from IMDb to Wikipedia because you are the person who originally wrote it. Unfortunately, in general (and I can't access IMDb from my work PC to verify this for that site), any material you write and submit to a site such as IMDb becomes the property of that site -- you lose your personal claim of copyright ownership. Thus, you are not allowed to copy the text verbatim from that site to here. Also, we have only your word as to the veracity of that claim anyway -- we really have no way of knowing if you truly are the person who wrote the IMDb synopsis. Your best bet is to just rewrite the synopsis in your own words. That won't guarantee that the article remains: there is still the notability issue. I noted on the Eileen Daly page that either she or the film won an award (the Van Gogh Award at the Amsterdam Film Festival). Although Wikipedia does not have an article on either the Van Gogh Award or the Amsterdam Film Festival, the award may have been covered in some press that might be a source of significant coverage as required by Wikipedia. Other than that, I'm not able to find any evidence of coverage, although I'll admit to the difficulty of searching for a title as generic as Rose. If you have sources that indicate significant coverage, please add them to the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:45, 2 June 2014 (UTC) I am not connected with the film 'rose' but do have permission from the filmmakers to write about it. I hope the page is able to remain. I will of course abide by any requests that you ask. Wiki is full of pages about films, those who make them. This page will be no different and is not being uploaded by me for any financial gain.[reply]

Sorry about that Michael. I shall remove any references to social media from the edits I performed today

Nomination of Rose (Film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rose (Film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose (Film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 19:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Stuart... please read WP:PRIMER and as WP:COI as linked above. While the template above suggests you might edit the article as its deletion is being discusses, maybe you should refrain. As other more experienced editors are taking a hand, best you let them do what they do best. This is advice only. Thanks, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:14, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart... read WP:LINKSTOAVOID. We do not link to social media sites nor to sales sites. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Bannerman, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Stuart Bannerman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on User talk:Stuart Bannerman were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in top right. For more details see talk page guidelines. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:53, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Largo...Im learning :)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited René Zagger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Womack. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom E. Morrison (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tom E. Morrison and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—Anne Delong (talk) 06:15, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tom E. Morrison concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tom E. Morrison, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tom E. Morrison

Hello, Stuart Bannerman. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Tom E. Morrison".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tommorrison245.jpg

The file File:Tommorrison245.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image, no context to determine possible future use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 12:15, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]