User talk:Claw of Slime

Claw of Slime, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Claw of Slime! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

hi, could not withdraw my editing? thanks. Gdominik100 (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive edit in template area

Hello, Claw

Perhaps you must study our reverting policy: Every single revert must have an explanation in edit summary; for complex reverts, there must be talk page explanation as well as a user page notice. This is critical in template area and especially true for highly-used templates such as Template:Infobox OS. In addition, you don't just revert a change in template area after two weeks of its adoption.

In template area, you must be very careful because bold edits can easily end up as reckless edits.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 02:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Latest preview software release/LibreOffice

Hello, you reverted my edit to this template. While the reason you gave "Alpha 1 is nightly build." is true, this makes no sense; because now we have the absurd situation where both "preview releases" are precursors to each of the "Fresh" and "Stable" releases, respectively.
Enquire (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for accepting my contribution. :)

-Erick

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transport Layer Security, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Firefox may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• III |publisher=Betanews |accessdate=May 4, 2010}}</ref> and support for the <code>&lt;video></code> and <code>&lt;audio></code> tags as defined in the [[HTML5]] specification, with a goal to offer video playback without
• 2012, the Mozilla Foundation announced the availability of an ''Extended Support Release (ESR)]'' version of Firefox.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

rvv'ing

I recommend waiting for 118.96.220.117‎‎ to be blocked, rather than reverting the edits immediately, and similarly with future cases. The history gets needlessly clogged, and you risk being blocked for violating WP:3RR. Wikipedia has many thousands of errors at any given time, so in my view it's preferable to just let the vandalism remain for a short while. On this note, I made a related edit that might interest you. I'm not sure what happened, or if I misunderstood something. —WOFall (talk) 18:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

In conclusion, *shrug*. —WOFall (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for comment. I will do so in the future :) --Claw of Slime (talk) 23:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transport Layer Security, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solaris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Summaries

Hi there.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 16:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Firefox: Adware

Mozilla Firefox is Adware since 2014-11-15. Why did you remove the category repeatedly?

Probably because the term "adware", despite what its article suggests, is generally understood to mean programs with obtrusive ads (appearing outside the originating program). In my opinion the existing list of articles in the "adware" category supports this. In any case, I suggest this discussion should be had on the firefox talk page. —WOFall (talk) 15:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Replied in Firefox talk page. --Claw of Slime (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of TLS implementations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solaris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poly1305-AES, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

"frequently updated" template

Hello. I saw that you changed the current version of Vivaldi to a "frequently updated" template. If possible, please do it to the Adblock Plus and NoScript articles too, because people keep editing these pages just to update the version numbers. If there isn't such template for the extension infox, please add it. -- Marawe (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Done. --Claw of Slime (talk) 23:42, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

• Adblock Plus: [1], (Template:Latest stable software release/Adblock Plus, Template:Latest preview software release/Adblock Plus)
• NoScript: [2], (Template:Latest stable software release/NoScript, Template:Latest preview software release/NoScript)

Vivaldi (web browser)

Hi.

{{Infobox web browser}} has no such parameter as |frequently updated=.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 02:00, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for information :) --Claw of Slime (talk) 04:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:ECMAScript test262

I found this patrolling new templates. It is currently only used in one article. Usually, tables are only split into templates if multiple articles use them. Test262 redirects to the same article, and I don't know if this would be useful in browser articles. What were you planning to do with this? —PC-XT+ 12:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

The aim is to separate the edit histories about test262 table from those about core contents of ECMAScript. As you can see [3], over 90% of latest history of ECMAScript is occupied by edit of test262 table. This situation makes it very difficult to trace the exact edit history about main contents. I referred to Template:Safari release compatibility and Template:SeaMonkey release history english, and have already applied same method to Template:TLS/SSL support history of web browsers, but no one regard these templates as questionable. --Claw of Slime (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

I see. I added documentation so someone doesn't merge it with the article without realizing why it has only one transclusion. A link to discussion leading up to the creation would also be helpful. If someone considers it single-use article text, (which would be against Wikipedia:Template namespace#Guidelines,) and doesn't see enough reason for it, they may bring it up for discussion at TfD. It would probably be a good idea to document the other templates, as well. Cheers! —PC-XT+ 23:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for adding documentation. I've added documentation to other templates. --Claw of Slime (talk) 04:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

help me lock

japanese claw, please help me lock all my IP addresses, then I would not be able to visit Wikipedia.org. If you could manage to lock all my IP addresses for ever, I would say thank you in advance. 175.19.66.5 (talk) 03:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)