Talk:Colonial Nigeria: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Jamie Tubers (talk | contribs) WikiProject reassessment |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Nationalism== |
==Nationalism== |
||
There was never a thing such as "Nigerian Nationalism". Nationalism in Nigeria was entirely a contraption of the South. |
There was never a thing such as "Nigerian Nationalism". Nationalism in Nigeria was entirely a contraption of the South. |
||
Maybe there is a more accurate term, but that is the term the relevant literature uses. |
|||
==Unbalanced== |
==Unbalanced== |
Revision as of 16:48, 16 February 2015
Africa: Nigeria Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
History Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Nationalism
There was never a thing such as "Nigerian Nationalism". Nationalism in Nigeria was entirely a contraption of the South.
Maybe there is a more accurate term, but that is the term the relevant literature uses.
Unbalanced
This Entire article is a polemic against the North. further more the author keeps on giving us he's/her's opinion without any sort of citations. I suggest the entire article be overhauled.
Plagiarism?
The section "Influence of the Christian Missions" (and possible more) is a direct copy from the site [1]. I'm not sure how it should be formatted, but at the moment, the formatting makes it look like original research (which it isn't).
- This is part of Helen Chapin Metz, ed. Nigeria: A Country Study, Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1991. While such country studies are available for use, as they are in the public domain as a government-prepared document, I would agree with you that it should be credited. Parkwells (talk) 18:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)