Jump to content

Talk:Colonial Nigeria: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WikiProject reassessment
Line 5: Line 5:
==Nationalism==
==Nationalism==
There was never a thing such as "Nigerian Nationalism". Nationalism in Nigeria was entirely a contraption of the South.
There was never a thing such as "Nigerian Nationalism". Nationalism in Nigeria was entirely a contraption of the South.

Maybe there is a more accurate term, but that is the term the relevant literature uses.


==Unbalanced==
==Unbalanced==

Revision as of 16:48, 16 February 2015

WikiProject iconAfrica: Nigeria Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Nigeria (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconHistory Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.


Nationalism

There was never a thing such as "Nigerian Nationalism". Nationalism in Nigeria was entirely a contraption of the South.

Maybe there is a more accurate term, but that is the term the relevant literature uses.

Unbalanced

This Entire article is a polemic against the North. further more the author keeps on giving us he's/her's opinion without any sort of citations. I suggest the entire article be overhauled.

Plagiarism?

The section "Influence of the Christian Missions" (and possible more) is a direct copy from the site [1]. I'm not sure how it should be formatted, but at the moment, the formatting makes it look like original research (which it isn't).

This is part of Helen Chapin Metz, ed. Nigeria: A Country Study, Washington: GPO for the Library of Congress, 1991. While such country studies are available for use, as they are in the public domain as a government-prepared document, I would agree with you that it should be credited. Parkwells (talk) 18:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]