User talk:Josve05a

Wikipedia ads	file info – #69

This is Josve05a's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Josve05a.

This is not a forum. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.

Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Assume good faith

Avoid personal attacks

For disputes, seek dispute resolution

Archives

Archives by month Archive Map Year 2010 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2011 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2013 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2014 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2015 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2016 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2017 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2018 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2019 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2020 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2021 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Year 2022 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Misc. Archives 1 2 3 4 5 6

You may want to increment {{Archive basics}} to |counter= 3 as User talk:Josve05a/Archive 2 is larger than the recommended 150Kb.

Many thanks!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Just dropping by to say thanks for the cleanup on the Los Angeles Poverty Department article I published Saturday. Looks much better! Nafpaktitism (talk) 15:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

My pleasure! (t) Josve05a (c) 21:43, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Copyright speedy eligibility

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

First of all, I want to say it is very much appreciated that you check for copyright violations - very few users do even though it is very important. However, I did want to remind you that if only a portion of page is a copyvio (such as was the case at Draft:Hild (novel)) then it isn't eligible for speedy deletion. By all means, decline the draft if it contains any copyrighted text and/or remove it yourself if you have the time. If the violation is too complex to fix quickly, but there appears to be non-copyrighted text in the article, then it can be listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Thanks! --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank. I have started using {{copyvio}} more and more. (t) Josve05a (c) 17:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bumps Inf

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Help me.The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RogerBo1940

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello Josve05a

Thank you for your message. As you will have appreciated this is my first time seeking to add some editing. In one sense I was not surprised by your rejection, because I was afraid that my personal comments might possibly breach the guidelines. However, you reference ‘original research’, and this does puzzle me. There has been a campaign by many expat British Pensioners living throughout the European Union, since a Judgment by the European Court of Justice in July 2011, opened up the possibility of more expats being able to claim an old-age benefit called Winter Fuel Payment. It is only £200 per annum, but the UK Government has decided to pursue a policy to remove this benefit in countries they have determined are ‘hot’! Over more than two years now there have been a number of reports and articles in National UK newspapers, which have given rise to much debate, blogs and comments, letter-writing, and questions in Parliament. The UK Government has published a number of documents which are relevant to the issue, and which again have given rise to much debate. I and several of my colleagues have put together a detailed Briefing Note, which is now available in version 9, and that does contain ‘original research’ since those who have contributed have gathered together items which may not have been linked or used before in the context in which they have been written. I wanted to add my piece to the profile of Iain Duncan Smith, under the section concerning his political career. After I read of the revelation of his false claim that he had studied at the University of Perugia which has been included by Wikipedia, and his ‘problems as leader’; I thought I was on safe ground to record what had been published in newspapers and compare that to facts and figures published by the UK Government. So, my first question would be - is it acceptable to remove all of my ‘comments’ in bold and underlined, following on from each section of ‘the claims’ and ‘the truth’? My second question quite simply is - please tell me if there is anything else? My third question concerns quotes I have included from letters in my possession. Do you need to have a link to a scan of those letters in PDF format, or simply a reference which identifies the letter and its date? My desire is to get this right, but at the same time, to ensure that there is the possibility to publish the claims and the truth associated with the two year campaign surrounding the Winter Fuel Payment.

RogerBo1940 (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

@RogerBo1940: I declined it because the draft read like an essay and not an encyclopedic article. When a sumbission starts with the header Is Iain Duncan Smith guilty of fraud? it is kind of obvious that it is an essay. Please rewrite it and please have a look at WP:REFBEGIN on how to format footnotes properly. Thanks. (t) Josve05a (c) 17:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

21:46:05, 23 February 2015 review of submission by RJSyracusano

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

• RJSyracusano (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Polish Legion of American Veterans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi - I'm not sure that I understand. I did not take copyrighted material from the website you sited. The website you sited (Post #55 of the PLAV, Salem, Massachusetts) is a Post of the Polish Legion of American Veterans. Post #55 took much of the information on their website from the Polish Legion of American Veterans (PLAV) USA national website. I cited the PLAV USA website in my submission. Thanks - please let me know if I have to do something else.

RJSyracusano (talk) 21:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Please read WP:COPYVIO and if you belive there is nothing wrong go to WP:undelete. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oxnard derailment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Re this edit, the article was not an orphan at the time. It was already linked from Valhalla train crash, Anekal derailment, 2015 Mount Carbon train derailment and Rafz train crash. Mjroots (talk) 18:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Upon the time I loaded the article in my computer it was an orpahan, I most have taken some time before I pressed save and in that time it was de-orpaned. I'm sorry. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

It was not an orphan because it was linked to the articles via the navbox on creation. Also, as a breaking story, you ought to allow a bit of time for links to be created from other articles. Mjroots (talk) 06:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Then there was an error and I take full responsibility for it. However no real harm was done. Thanks for alerting me. (t) Josve05a (c) 17:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article : Adeola Austin Oyinlade

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I have improved the article. I will like to get rid of the errors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adeola_Austin_Oyinlade — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennyadex (talk • contribs) 18:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

If you belive you have fixed the error mentioned, feel free to remove the "warnings". However that article is still an orphan since no other article links to it. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

AWB

Please can read the rules of use for AWB? It's clear you don't understand them. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 19:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

@Lugnuts: It would be good in future encounters if you would list the "problems" you're refering to since some people have disabled Echo-notifications (I haven't). I saw the articles no and it's a clear case that it was AWB that was malfunctuning. I know that can't be an excuse I am held resonsible. But really, there were no reall harm. (Except for the attack with the wording "abuse"). I will install the latest revision of AWB and see if this bug has been fixed, otherwise I will ping Magioladitis to notify im of this bug. (t) Josve05a (c) 20:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

From rules of use. Item #1 in bold: You are responsible for every edit made. Seems pretty clear cut to me. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I know, and as I said it isn't an excuse, just an explanation. And after seeing that I was editing in error I stopped. (t) Josve05a (c) 08:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Patient innovation

Dear Josve05a,

Thank you for your review on my first attempt to create an article. I would like to tell you that I already tried to improve reference, and as such I would like to ask you for your opinion... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:C.150113001.H/sandbox

Thanks again, hope to hear from you soon C.150113001.H — Preceding unsigned comment added by C.150113001.H (talk • contribs) 22:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

@C.150113001.H: Hello. I've read your draft and I have to say that it read kind of like an ad. With wrods such as "The concept is a simple one" and "How it works". Please read Wikipedia:NOT on how to deal with this. Thanks. (t) Josve05a (c) 17:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Flinching Eye Collective

I am writing to make sure I am going about correcting my issue with the article I submitted on the Flinching Eye Collective. I had gotten permission from them to quote their website but didn't know how to cite it properly. I have gone back and rewritten it with my own words. Is that the correct step to take and did I resubmit it properly?

Thank you,

Joseph Jensen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseph Jensen (talk • contribs) 23:07, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials on how to do if you'd like to include that material. Otherwise, rewrite it with your own words and resubmit it. Thanks. (t) Josve05a (c) 18:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

04:22:16, 25 February 2015 review of submission by Find bruce

• Find bruce (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ossie Nicholson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi,

I am a bit confused & lost. I don't want a re-review - I understand, and agree with, the need to respect copyright.

What I am looking for is an indication of which bits of the article are thought to violate copyright so that I can re-write them befor ere-submitting.

Thanks

Find bruce (talk) 04:22, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

@Find bruce: You can have a look at this link to see the comparison and from which page it seemed copied and what it was. (t) Josve05a (c) 04:27, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Medium Reconnaissance Vehicle - submission declined for copyright violation

Hi, thanks for the review. It's my first article so i didn't expect I'd get it right first time. I do find it rather odd that it would be flagged for copyright infringement of http://essmc.org.au/pat_mccumiskey_idf_m113_c+c.html when that webpage very clearly states that its source of reference is... Wikipedia. It is a straight copy & paste of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variants_of_the_M113_armored_personnel_carrier (the Australia section). The paragraph within the wikipedia page about the M113A1 Medium Reconnaissance Vehicle is what I am trying to expand upon with my page, using additional information. I'm not quite sure what i do with the page now - do i just resubmit it? Cheers, Jp-8000 (talk) 10:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I see two issues here. One being that you can't use Wikipedia as a source/reference. The other one being that you can't copy from other articles with out properly attributing it, please read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. (t) Josve05a (c) 18:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello again. I have added attribution in the edit summary as per the help article you listed above. Is there anything else that I still need to do? Thanks again, Jp-8000 (talk) 13:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Renegade (Aerosmith Side Project)

How can I redirect this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renegade_(Aerosmith_Side_Project) to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Crespo#Aerosmith_years it explains everything i wanted to, and better I'm new of wikipedia, I just want to help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.10.254.98 (talk) 13:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

please read Help:Redirect for guides about redirects. (t) Josve05a (c) 13:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Ginny Good submission by Endpress

Thank you for responding so swiftly to my submission. Could you clarify whether a9 the subject matter itself or b9 the treatment of it, makes the article unsuitable for inclusion in Wikipedia'

Thank you again for your attention to this request for information Best wishes, EndpressEndpress (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

@Endpress: It's the "treatment of it". Articles needs to be written from an encyclopedic viewpoint and only inlude thinds which independend, reliable, third party sources has mentioned (See WP:42). These sources should bee footnoted to show what they support (see WP:REFBEGIN) and Wikipedia can't be used as a source.

If no independend, reliable, third party sources, such as newspapers etc. has discussed the subject in-depth, then it might just be too soon to include it in the encyclopedia.

Yours truly

(t) Josve05a (c) 21:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I fixed and rewrote my earlier AfC, kindly look into it when you have time

Hello Josve05a,

I am new to Wikipedia and learning my way through by experiments and also by making mistakes. I'm glad that you reviewed my AfC a few days back, and declined it due to copyright infringement. It gave me a chance to learn about this set of Wikipedia guidelines. I took my time and rewrote and improved my AfC.

I would really appreciate if you could look into my AfC once more whenever convenient. Link to it: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Roots_Millennium_Schools)

Thanks much!

Best Regards, Bites85 (talk) 22:14, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft: Care Transitions Intervention

Hello,

I sent you an email, but I have since found the comment on my draft page which states what website my article is being associated with. I have looked at the website: http://www.rosalynncarter.org/care_transitions/. This website is giving an overview of some of the research and the program that my article is about, it is using some of the same sources but does not directly site what content comes from those sources. The sources are just listed at the bottom of the website, but there is no in text citations. I believe the reason my page has been associated with this website is because we have used some of the same sources and we are discussing the same topic, however I have never seen this site before, nor have I taken any content from it. Can you help me remedy this issue.

Thank you! HPM200B (talk) 00:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Request on 04:19:37, 26 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Anturevon

• Anturevon (talk · contribs)
  • User:Anturevon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Assuming that you are a human. I wrote

"Nahar is an ngo that provides health and education services to low-income households in Kafrul, Dhaka. Nahar started its journey in 1996 as a social welfare organisation."

It was directly cited from their web site. Which is a public domain. The reason that I quoted directly because it gives the information without advertising about themselves.

http://naharsocial.biz/

Here is more information about it on the Bangladeshi NGO directory. http://ngodhaka.com/ngo_details.php?id=83

Anturevon (talk) 04:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

First of I see no evidence that that is under public domain, secondly if you just quote the official page it makes it read like an advertisment for obvious reasons.

• The fact that a business or organisation exists is not grounds for having an article.

• Whether your competitors have an article or not is completely irrelevant.

• Being a competent professional in your field is not the standard for having an article.

Articles generally require significant coverage

in reliable sources

that are independent of the topic.

(t) Josve05a (c) 13:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Request on 09:27:59, 26 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Evelyn Lori

• Evelyn Lori (talk · contribs)
  • User:Evelyn Lori (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I want to know more about notability conditions. I am very much looking forward to make my article accepted and visible. I am writing about technology, and in that context, describing about such a provider in Washington state.

Please point out specific obstacles and respective measures to sort those out.

Evelyn Lori (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Geranium_Homes

Thank you for looking at our Wikipedia Page Geranium Homes, it's much appreciated - however I'm confused with your concern about copyright issue - "This submission appears to be taken from http://fridayharbourresort.com/lake-simcoe-condos-for-sale/press/article/1." Friday Harbour Resorts is a development with geranium homes, it's one of our holdings, and all the material was written by us. If you were to go to our homepage www.geraniumhomes.com - and you will see the icon for Friday Harbour. Here are the other press releases in the same area that you cited copyright - http://fridayharbourresort.com/media/press/HomesMag_June2013_Friday_Harbour.pdf and http://fridayharbourresort.com/media/press/TorontoStar_Sat_Aug.24_2013_Friday_Harbour.pdf as you can see we ARE Friday Harbour, this is our content. Even in the article you quoted, it has our name Geranium Corporation in the release. Please let me know what to do, this is approved wording and not sure why it's considered copyrighted material, when it is our material. I appreciate your feedback and thanks for your work. Let me know what else I can do to clarify this, and thanks,Lcamus (talk) 15:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)