Talk:Garissa University College attack

Numbers of victims

In our introductory sentence we say 15 were dead. But in the infobox we say 70. This needs to be clarified. No explanation provided about the source behind 70 dead although 15 dead is duly sourced. werldwayd (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Agreed. I was confused when I first saw the article as well. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

When this story is no longer current as "news" and has fallen greatly from favor of popular media, will it be moved into the main article "Garissa University College" ? I have seen in some Wikipedia main entries that such sensational stories appear to be separately written or rewritten before they appear stories in the main entry. Wayne Roberson, Austin, Texas (talk) 03:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Islamic terrorism

As I have explained, that article is not updated. I have explained and added specific related instances instead. Further, if we were to have blanket lists here then we can add the whole harem of "List of terrorist incidents, XXXX" and massively inflate the "See also."

Also judging by his edits, he seems hell bent on criticizing Islamic politics (as he did in the Iran-"led" Southern Syrian Offensive page.120.62.24.165 (talk) 05:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

this attack was islamic terrorism. the list i added is a list of islamic terror incidents. it's relevant to the article.SyriaWarLato (talk) 05:53, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

"As I have explained, that article is not updated." + "then we can add the whole harem of "List of terrorist incidents, XXXX" and massively inflate the "See also.""

Please don't just listen to yourself and presume you've gained consensus. That is not how Wikipedia works.120.62.24.165 (talk) 05:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

as i said. japanese hostage crisis has no relevance to this article. also the list I added is exactly for deflating the "see also" section, since it contains most recent terrorists incidentsSyriaWarLato (talk) 06:02, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

As explained MORE than once for the context of POLITICAL hostage sieges the said user insists on only seeing what he wants to. [1]

It does not deflate as it is not updated AND "then we can add the whole harem of "List of terrorist incidents, XXXX" and massively inflate the "See also.""

Get consensus BEFORE readdition120.62.24.165 (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

His only addition to this page (and the other) is his blind insistence on having his way of adding "Islamic" terrorism. One can note this from the edit history.120.62.24.165 (talk) 06:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)