Talk:Westinghouse Atom Smasher: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:42, 25 April 2015

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pennsylvania Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pittsburgh Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Physics Start‑class Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Westinghouse Atom Smasher appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 February 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Westinghouse Atom Smasher (pictured), a 65-foot (20 m) Van de Graaff generator built near Pittsburgh in 1937, was instrumental in the development of practical applications of nuclear science for energy production?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Westinghouse Atom Smasher.

Wikipedia

Better name?

I'm pretty sure the official name for this facility was not "Westinghouse Atom Smasher". I suggest this page be moved to a more appropriate name. If we can't find the official name, something like Westinghouse 1937 Van de Graaff accelerator might be more specific and informative. --Chetvorno^TALK 22:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Wikipedia:Article titles#Common names, "Wikipedia prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in reliable English-language sources) as such names will be the most recognizable and the most natural". Take a look at all the sources, Westinghouse Atom Smasher is the most prevalent and recognizable name for this object, so it should remain where it is. --GrapedApe (talk) 10:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have to agree with you. Normally if an accelerator is notable it is commonly referred to by its name; nobody calls the Large Hadron Collider the "Geneva Atom Smasher". But I can't find much reference to the Westinghouse machine in technical literature. Its useful life was short; it was apparently obsolete soon after it was completed. And there is some speculation that it was just built for PR purposes, as a prestige item to attract scientific talent to Westinghouse. I guess its most notable role was as a Pittsburgh-area landmark, and the Landmark Commission calls it the "Westinhouse Atom Smasher", so Westinghouse Atom Smasher it is. --Chetvorno^TALK 15:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting--are you aware of any references that may have been built mostly for PR purposes? That would be worth adding.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:58, 22 April 2015 edit Chetvorno (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 64,421 edits →‎Better name?: I have to agree with you ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:42, 25 April 2015 edit undo GrapedApe (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers 27,368 edits →‎Better name? Next edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::Well, I have to agree with you. Normally if an accelerator is notable it is commonly referred to by its name; nobody calls the [[Large Hadron Collider]] the "Geneva Atom Smasher". But I can't find much reference to the Westinghouse machine in technical literature. Its useful life was short; it was apparently obsolete soon after it was completed. And there is some speculation that it was just built for PR purposes, as a prestige item to attract scientific talent to Westinghouse. I guess its most notable role was as a Pittsburgh-area landmark, and the Landmark Commission calls it the "Westinhouse Atom Smasher", so [[Westinghouse Atom Smasher]] it is. --<font color="blue">[[User:Chetvorno\|Chetvorno]]</font><sup>''<small>[[User talk:Chetvorno\|<font color="Purple">TALK</font>]]</small>''</sup> 15:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)		::Well, I have to agree with you. Normally if an accelerator is notable it is commonly referred to by its name; nobody calls the [[Large Hadron Collider]] the "Geneva Atom Smasher". But I can't find much reference to the Westinghouse machine in technical literature. Its useful life was short; it was apparently obsolete soon after it was completed. And there is some speculation that it was just built for PR purposes, as a prestige item to attract scientific talent to Westinghouse. I guess its most notable role was as a Pittsburgh-area landmark, and the Landmark Commission calls it the "Westinhouse Atom Smasher", so [[Westinghouse Atom Smasher]] it is. --<font color="blue">[[User:Chetvorno\|Chetvorno]]</font><sup>''<small>[[User talk:Chetvorno\|<font color="Purple">TALK</font>]]</small>''</sup> 15:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

			:::Interesting--are you aware of any references that may have been built mostly for PR purposes? That would be worth adding.--[[User:GrapedApe\|GrapedApe]] ([[User talk:GrapedApe\|talk]]) 12:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)