User talk:Amaury

It is approximately 4:14 PM where this user lives.

Welcome to my talk page! I have a few requests that I hope you'll respect while posting here: Be civil. If you don't agree with an action I made, please be calm and polite. We'll straighten things out a lot quicker without screaming and name calling. Sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~ Start new discussions at the bottom. Start new discussions with a level three heading. I generally like to keep discussions together. If you post here, I'll reply here and leave you a message informing you of my reply. If I leave you a message on your talk page, I'll keep watching it, but if you want to make sure I notice it quickly, please feel free to tag me by typing {{re|Amaury}} before your main message.

Archives
2009
2010
2012
2013
2014
2015

April 2015

JudithFisherFreed

There is a problem with COI and inappropriately marking edits as minor, but I see nothing that could be considered vandalism. If you disagree, please address this issue at User talk:JudithFisherFreed. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

User_talk:2601:2:1180:315:990F:7D03:BC69:80DB

Hey Amaury, don't worry man, no need to edit-war on a vandals own talk page. He's just getting off on the attention since that's all he's able to do now.

Moosehadley 03:36, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Reverting obvious vandalism is exempt from WP:3RR. Repeated personal attacks count as vandalism. The user has now been hard blocked and cannot edit their talk page, in any case. - Amaury (talk) 03:42, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Just an aside; You may find User:Jayron32's note on the [log] amusing :)

Moosehadley 03:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Yup, gave me a good chuckle as well. - Amaury (talk) 03:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

If we didn't laugh, we'd have to cry, sometimes. --Jayron32 03:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Garissa University College attack

The source is in the edit summary. I added it again to the summary. Please include it in the article.120.62.24.165 (talk) 05:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

I hope its all answered now.120.62.24.165 (talk) 05:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Is this source reliable?

Hi, I need your help. I want to add some information on Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University.

I wanted to know that whether this source is considered reliable or not. [1]

Even though website name is Brahma Kumaris, it is not run by the organisation. This website is not associated with the organisation so it is 3rd party source.

I am new to wikipedia. You have lot of experience. I want to know can that source be added as reference?

I will only take information in home page NOT from threads.

Supdiop (talk) 14:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for quickly reverting vandalism on my user page! ~HackedBotato Chat with me ♽ Contribs 00:20, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

@HackedBotato: You're welcome! - Amaury (talk) 00:23, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Ghostwriters

New here to Wikipedia editing -- could not find a tab to start a new thread on this Talk: Amaury page, so I am placing this here:

re GHOSTWRITER page:

I did a great deal of work on this page today -- only to later discover 2 changes by Fresh Sullivan and Amaury, and their comments in TALK.

1) No humor was intended. Please clarify what was interpreted as humor. (Fresh Sullivan))

2) Nor was any edit by me considered non-constructive or vandalism. (Amaury) I am new here but can see from a few links that vandalism is a common charge. Please clarify this in relation to what I did today on this page -- unless this was a mistake.

From my point of view, I took this very rough article and remolded it into what I felt was useful, even vital, in an understanding of this business. I kept whatever I could of what was there and tried to work with it. I spent hours on this work, today.

I am a professional ghostwriter. An outsider (non-ghostwriter) cannot comment fully on this business. It is a complex business, and hardly understood by those not in it for a serious long while; nor by those who act merely as middlemen and do not also write; nor by those who perhaps did not have several decades in other aspects of publishing in order to understand the business globally, as I do, and how ghosting fits into the matrix of publishing.

As far as I could tell -- one objection made by Amaury was to making a paragraph that had been taking almost verbatim from the Manhattan Literary website into a quote, attributed to that co. I am new here as a Wikipedia editor and perhaps there is a rule I overlooked. Better to quote it, I thought, and note the source.

Where was the joke? (There is also such a thing as insightful humor; or jokes can be a mere byproduct of a good point.) Maybe this criticism was made in relation to someone else using an IP address confused as mine.

Please clarify. Ghostwriting is my profession and a big part of my life, so I take this seriously. This page was in dire need of help, and I don't wish to be alienated so early in my editing experience.

I am certainly willing to learn rules here -- again, I am new to this. But to do so much work and have people ready to attack it (NB: reverting to what I myself did -- the reversion is to what I wrote, not someone else) and not add anything substantial??? I know this is the nature of the deal here, that anyone can edit -- but please be clear.- Mariwiki77

38.109.98.242 (talk) 17:38, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Reversion - Reply

No worries, we well-intended users are born to: 1 - get along well; 2 - work for the good of the project. Mission accomplished here, don't be afraid to revert me when I incur in a mistake (which I have/will have).

Happy week, from Portugal --84.90.219.128 (talk) 19:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Why did you undo it on DayalBagh page ?

Tell me very clearly

Whatever i said, was it incorrect ??

Only yes or NO.

i posted correct information as per my opinion, and also i posted various LINKS too , that too from the WebSite of this Organisation, was it all incorrect ???

please reply, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.143.240.5 (talk) 20:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Occold

Hi there, I am the person who edited the page on the village of Occold.Unfortunately there was not much to go on with the history of the village, so I had to put a past residents extract on so there was a brief history of the village on the page. The extract is from http://historyofsuffolk.co.uk/Occold/index1865.shtml. The other information is general knowledge, e.g. I know the dialling code and postal town. All the information I have stated is completely correct, so if possible can you undo your edit. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.4.76.117 (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

I do not understand why all these warnings

I've edited the article (Jalil Hanoon) and then asked for me to add sources and I do, why all of these warnings and threats? ميناء (talk) 21:21, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello. Thanks for this edit. The user is not understanding what I'm saying and is just mad that it can't be listed like that in the Today Show article. I'm not sure how to get it across this editor, and as I told him/her, I might take it to a noticeboard. I'm done reverting for now as I don't want that to cause a problem if I do take it there. Corky | Chat? 01:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Edward Snowden

Your revert to my edits of Edward Snowdon page are inaccurate, there are new interviews out and this man has committed negligence, please desist from reverting my edits! 86.134.169.7 (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Please provide reliable sources, then, to back up your edits. Otherwise, they are considered disruptive. - Amaury (talk) 06:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Serfdom in Russia

Dear Amaury, your reverts to Serfdom in Russia are very wrong: the user wrote a paragraph, then added a correction to that paragraph, was (erroneously) reverted by the bot, reverted back, and you wrote him a scalding message reverting the changes back to the bot version. This is wrong, because the bot was clearly in error. Please try to be more careful when you revert. Thanks. Tiphareth (talk) 06:16, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Still figuring things out

Hi hope I am doing this right. I am getting warned for making a bad change. But I don't understand why - could you please explain. SOmeone is making the article totally untrue - and in the talk page everyone agrees. Then the man called the other people "idiot" and "ass" but I amm the Oone who got warned!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cavalierman (talk • contribs) 06:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Mai Thu Huong

I vandalism this page because i want this page is protected 58.187.71.185 (talk) 06:10, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Coert

I am new to Wikipedia, fixing my schools page per asignment and also doing a bit of history my own, and i accidently made the Coert page meaning to make a Coert Van Voorhees page which I have subsequently made. The Coert page can be deleted for the information has been moved to the correct page at Coert Van Voorhees. Thank You.MattVoorhees15 (talk) 00:59, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

British Academy Film Awards

Hello, You are right concerning the article relating The British Film Academy Awards, it makes the page look untidy, BAFTA is just the nickname ,like some people call the American Academy awards as Oscar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.15.25 (talk) 03:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Chamkaur

sir visit my talk page plz Ak47wale (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Hounding

I understand your post to my talk page. Dougweller and Shibbolethink have been hounding me. I asked them nicely to stop even letting them know I would seek disciplinary actions if they didn't. Instead of stopping they've gotten worse. I am new to Wikipedia and you can follow my editing history for only a few days about topics I believe wikipedia users may be interested in more information. You will see they hounded me from the first post and have continued to do so. Instead of encouraging me to do better these two editors inject their personal points of view through disruptive editing and eliminate well sourced citations if they are critical of their point of view. This does not enhance Wikipedia, in fact it perpetuates one of the greatest criticisms and that is editors who bully others into either leaving entirely or giving up. It in no way improves the neutrality of the articles. In fact, one article I was working on sounded so much like a press release it was disgusting and include virtully no citations yet these two Wikihounders were perfectly happy with it. All I've done is reply in the same way as they have replied to me. I would expect better from experienced Wikipedia users.66.190.249.59 (talk) 22:14, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

@66.190.249.59: I can certainly understand your frustrations, but inappropriately templating a regular is not the way to go. If you personally feel these users have stepped out of line, you're more than free to create a report at WP:AN/I or WP:AN/EW (whichever you feel is appropriate -- the latter is for edit-warring) and get opinions from uninvolved editors. - Amaury (talk) 22:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Puberty starts at age 9 for girls

It does your incorrect and boys start at age 10 and girls start at age 9. Read the internet puberty usually occurs at age 10 for boys and 9 for girls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordanandpeopleyaywoohoo (talk • contribs) 22:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jordanandpeopleyaywoohoo: You changed info that was properly sourced. If you can find another reliable source that backs up your claims, then feel free to change it or add new sentences explaining your claims. - Amaury (talk) 22:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Jordanandpeopleyaywoohoo (talk · contribs), you should reply in this section, not how you did earlier; therefore, I removed your "I will report you" text. If you report Amaury, or me, it will backfire on you; see WP:BOOMERANG. The Internet is not a reliable source by itself. Sources found on the Internet, however, can be reliable. For what Wikipedia considers a reliable source, see WP:Reliable source. I already pointed you to the WP:Verifiability policy on your talk page. The content that you are changing at the Puberty article does not state that girls never begin puberty at age 9 or that boys never begin puberty at age 10; it's stating that girls usually begin puberty at age 10 or 11, and that boys usually begin puberty at age 11 or 12. And, as mentioned above, it's sourced. Flyer22 (talk) 22:54, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

i am carrying edit by personal discussions with Mishti Chakaravarty

sir... iam carrying the edit by having personal discussions with Mishti mam...... plz guide me where am i wrong.... i can give conformation on her official FaceBook page....plz dont block me...and re-edit text which is not at all obejectionable...plz allow to kkeep it till tomorrow morning till MIshti MAM sees it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yash W (talk • contribs) 16:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

MMMOusley

I am trying to delete AyubOgada, as this is copy of the Ayub_Ogada, I made the mistake and trying to resolve it by delete the article and putting the information on the correct article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMMOusley (talk • contribs) 20:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

IP

Right after you warned that IP, I found and reverted [2]. I'm not an admin, but seems blockable now.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 03:55, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Navid Khiabani

Hello Please do not delete [[ navid Khiabani } Page that we are team working on it to create a professional page we are chasing the guy and his activities since long as reporters give us time for 1-2 month — Preceding unsigned comment added by Remot sam (talk • contribs) 23:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Imaginaerum Article

@Amaury:

Hi. What am i doing wrong? I did cite the sources for the changes i made. Please see below:

During the USA tour, singer Anette Olzon fell ill at the show in Denver on September 28th, 2012. Elize Ryd and Alissa White-Gluz, the back-up singers for Kamelot, stepped in to help perform the show. After the Denver show, NIGHTWISH posted the following message on its Facebook page: "We were in hell [yesterday]. Vocalist in a hospital. Show about to be canceled... But nobody gave up an inch. With the help from the ladies Elize and Alissa from KAMELOT, we actually managed to pull of a relaxed and great show! The crowd doing the mass karaoke with the band playing was absolutely amazing. We were humbled and grateful at the same time. This is unity and help from friends and fans."<ref>http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/nightwish-in-denver-a-night-without-anette-olzon/</ref> Two days later, Anette Olzon was let go from the band with Floor Jansen being called to finish the tour in her place.<ref>http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/it-s-official-nightwish-parts-ways-with-singer-anette-olzon/</ref> Floor Jansen was announced as the new singer of Nightwish in October 2013.<ref>http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/nightwish-mainman-says-floor-jansen-was-asked-to-become-permanent-member-in-june/</ref> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.71.46.189 (talk) 03:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Fixed

Article was fixed. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.148.149.114 (talk) 06:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

How is this vandalism!

I am trying to inform others of this school I do not see how this vandalism please tell me why! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ios8jailbreakpangu (talk • contribs) 22:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

• Already answered at User talk:Amortias. Drmies (talk) 22:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Clarification of link removal

Can you clarify your removal of the Forbes and Businessweek rankings on the Desautels Faculty of Management page? The refs are from the rankings themselves, not the university page?142.157.194.131 (talk) 04:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Beaten to the punch

Oi, how am I supposed to look productive if you keep beating me to vandalism rollbacks? Seriously though, keep up the good work :) Interference 541 (talk) 07:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Trying to be helpful

The items I have added to the page you keep taking down are being cited. The are also information listed in the other sources listed currently on this page. This page has many errors including the photo of the national building. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.68.214.141 (talk) 01:14, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Reversion Reply: Salisbury Steak

I changed "Hamburger Steak" to "Hamburg Steak", the name of the actual dish. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamburg_steak. I will change throughout the article. Hamburger has buns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.209.203 (talk) 05:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Re: Amanush 2

i am asking you why you remove my external links contribution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmshoikatkhan (talk • contribs) 08:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

User talk:4rallyhealth

I just wanted to clarify the high level vandal warning for this edit. I know the username is a violation of policy which they were already warned about, but this edit was a good faith edit following policy for a COI editor.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

@Mcmatter: Not sure why it did a level four. I don't see any active warnings on their page, so it should have been a level one warning. - Amaury (talk) 04:34, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Clarification on requested article

I'm trying to request an article so I made an edit to the article Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies per the instructions on Wikipedia:Requested articles. I was not trying to engage in vandalism. Please advise if there's a different process I need to follow in order to request a new article. Thanks! 4rallyhealth (talk) 00:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Shyama Mukerjee 'chalenge'

The Hindi word had been spelled like the English word 'challenge'. It is confusing to the readers (it was confusing to me) while the actual Hindi word does not require two 'l's to represent its proper pronunciation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.93.83.33 (talk) 05:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Re:User:Hijiri88/sandbox

Hi, it's me. I'm editing logged out because I got the afternoon off work (I had some overtime leave that expires today) but I've got a cold so I'm editing Wikipedia from my phone in a cafe. I'm not allowed use my work computer to edit Wikipedia, and if I edit logged-in people might get the wrong idea. My phone's IP prevents that. 182.249.15.106 (talk) 06:43, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

@182.249.15.106: Noted. Thanks for letting me know. - Amaury (talk) 06:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

Thank you for your help in keeping Don Lane (Santa Cruz)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Lane_%28Santa_Cruz%29 honest and as negotiated on October 15 2014. They have added this sentence: "The following paragraph was written by a political opponent of Lane who has decided to take up 25 percent of Lane's biography with his obsession with a minor event from more than 25 years ago that is not accurately described. The references cited do not actually verify all of the contents of this paragraph:" which is patently untrue. I am not the political opponent they are referring to though I do oppose many of Lane's policies and decisions. I have added this after the above inserted sentence: "The previous sentence is not true as evidenced by the following links and direct quotes."

It's funny how Don Lane and his team are so upset about this episode that they lie about it. It's also funny that Don Lane refers to it in a jokingly condescending manner in a recent fluff piece about him in a local paper: http://www.gtweekly.com/index.php/santa-cruz-news/santa-cruz-local-news/6203-on-his-terms.html

Again, thanks for your help and diligence on this page. Let's keep it up! The Man of Heart (talk) 13:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

• Comment This isn't how content disputes are dealt with on BLPs. 3RR notices issued, temp semi protection requested. Take it to Talk:Don Lane (Santa Cruz). Keri (talk) 14:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

A Little Help?

Apparently I've been flagged as to be in an Edit War at Don Lane (Santa Cruz). If you have the time and interest, would you comment on the Article's Talk Page? Thanks, The Man of Heart (talk) 17:49, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Don_Lane_%28Santa_Cruz%29

@The Man of Heart: Sorry for the late reply, but as I'm not familiar with the subject, I'm afraid I can't be of help. - Amaury (talk) 06:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Re: Manure

Good day, Amauri! My name is Vanessa. I would like to know why some of the information I have added on the page named "Manure" has been deleted? I did not add any false information, and made sure my information is accurate. This must be an error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanessa 122333 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

@Vanessa 122333: It's not encyclopedia material. It's also a personal opinion, which violates Wikipedia's neutrality policy. - Amaury (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Camelwriter

I'm not spamming the Quartzsite, Arizona page. I am simply going through the process trying to update the page. If my etiquette is wrong, my apologies. Please be patient. I was planning a series of improvements. Please advise me as to how to proceed. Thank you.

Camelwriter (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:39, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

@Camelwriter: Winner 42 can chime in here. - Amaury (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Content Moderation is hard

Especially when you have to babysit edit trolls. Seriously, my leet anti-vandal rankings are taking huge hits tonight :( Interference 541 (talk) 06:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Haha, agreed! - Amaury (talk) 06:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

'OR, you could try to WP:AGF, try to actually help make an encyclopaedia, instead of trying to Whac-A-Mole.

I think you're playing wikipedia like a game. It's not a game.

You are probably a nice-enough person, but you're playing me like you'd play space-invaders. Maybe I'm actually trying to do something here - certainly not 'vandalising'.

I'm happy to discuss it, but I think it's likely you'll just revert this without answering - let's see...

Bobbertybob (talk) 06:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

@Bobbertybob: Please see my latest message on your talk page. Interference 541 (talk) 06:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

@Bobbertybob: How about you start by reading the notices, comments and links you deleted from your talk page? Thanks! -- haminoon (talk) 06:29, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

I have read them. Anything specific you want to ask? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbertybob (talk • contribs) 06:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

So why did you keep re-tagging articles with nonsense and incorrect criteria afterwards? -- haminoon (talk) 06:39, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Which? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbertybob (talk • contribs) 06:45, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

How about all of them? - Amaury (talk) 06:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

How about AGF? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbertybob (talk • contribs) 06:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

WP:AGF is for Editors, not moderators. Put down the eraser and contribute. Interference 541 (talk) 06:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

@Bobbertybob:Specifically you tagged Muara Bungo with the made up "utterly pointless" speedy deletion criteria three times. You either didn't read or ignored the communication on your talk page. AGF is a two-way street. -- haminoon (talk) 06:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Amaury, What do you mean by 'moderator' in this sense? I think you misunderstand how wikipedia works.

Haminoon, do you think that this adds to our (V) encyclopaedic knowledge of this world? If we allow it, then surely anyone can just add any 'foo is a place if baatown' - which devalues the entire project. I'm happy to discuss it though. Bobbertybob (talk) 07:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For all of your work reverting vandals, trolls, and other disruptive editors. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

@Gogo Dodo: Thank you very much, sir. - Amaury (talk) 07:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Cheers, Mate

Keep up on the defense, I'm out for the night! Interference 541 (talk) 08:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

@Interference 541: Yeah, I should be getting to bed myself soon. It's 1:15 AM here. Have a good night. - Amaury (talk) 08:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Content you deleted

Hello, I'm Georgemalliaras. I noticed that you removed my contribution to Organic electronics citing vandalism. Since when legitimate scientific contributions constitute vandalism? You can check the sources, all in peer-reviewed journals. Please restore the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgemalliaras (talk • contribs) 20:02, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Bill Schuster (American football)

Hi. I looked on one of my articles, Bill Schuster (American football), and I noticed it keeps getting vandalized by an IP address and that was his final warning. Please block him. Thanks Fresh Sullivan (talk) 22:32, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

@Fresh Sullivan: I'm not an administrator, but C.Fred, who is an administrator, seems to be currently active. Perhaps he could take a look, so I've tagged him. - Amaury (talk) 22:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

@Amaury: sorry for thinking you were an admin. I will talk to him. Thanks! Fresh Sullivan (talk) 22:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

@Fresh Sullivan: No worries. It's not the first time it's happened. :) If in doubt, always look at the user's user rights log. For example, see C. Fred's here. - Amaury (talk) 22:37, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 79.97.226.247 (talk) 22:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Marhc vandal

Hi Amaury, you recently reported 98.90.88.69 to AIV. A quick note that I've logged a number of their IPs at User:Cyphoidbomb/Marhc Vandal. If you spot them, you could presumably just refer to my list without having to climb up the warning tree with them—that's just a waste of time. Regards! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Thanks for the heads up. I wasn't even aware of the whole mess and thought it was just another vandal until I saw your comment on AIV. - Amaury (talk) 02:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Happy to help. And please feel free to add new IPs you happen upon to the list. I saw that you AIV'd 2602:306:25A5:8459:B829:A3B4:8593:A767, so thanks for that. I've added them to the list. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

manchester fashion week not being vandalised, information wrong

HI i tried to edit manchester fashion week as the content is incorrect. It is not a twice annual event, no show has actually taken place since 2013, it never took place last year as it was cancelled. The entrepreneur Jason was taken to court http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/manchester-fashion-week-cancelled-over-2519867 http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/manchester-fashion-week-boss-jonathan-3564909 I legitimately own the domain name for manchesterfashionweek.com and .co.uk, my website is manchesterfashionweek.com i have run liverpool fashion week for 5 years and have taken over manchester http://www.manchesterconfidential.co.uk/health-and-beauty/fashion/revealed-liverpool-to-take-over-manchester-fashion-week it is recognised by the manchester fashion council http://www.manchesterfashion.com/event/590/childsplay-clothing-manchester-fashion-week so you see your information is out of date can you please amend or let me amend — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amandalifestyle (talk • contribs) 15:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Re: Phoenix Global

I need to remove the lies being made about Phoenix Global and the truth about how corrupt the CCC is. Tort1001 (talk) 03:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Please assist in the truth. You don't understand how corrupt CCC is Tort1001 (talk) 03:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@Tort1001: That is not the way to handle it. If you feel there are issues with an article, please take it to the article's talk page and reach a consensus with other editors. - Amaury (talk) 03:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

By the way, Tort1001 is impersonating Tort1201 and I suggest not taking anything they say seriously. I emailed 1201 and he said the new account is not his. I've reported 1001 here. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 07:54, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

ANI regarding JS18WIKIPEDIA and Born Rich (film)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 19:31, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello Amaury: It's curious to me that my little paragraph is being deleted for lack of sourcing, but the paragraph immediately preceding it is not. Why is this? I will undo your delete and provide a source. Thank you.