Jump to content

Talk:Fever Dream (short story): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Science Fiction: importance=Low, class=C (assisted)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


I remember reading this as a kid. But I'm pretty sure it was in a magazine or maybe a school text book, and not a compilation of Bradbury stories. Is there any way to find out where all this story has been published in the past? [[Special:Contributions/209.91.15.36|209.91.15.36]] ([[User talk:209.91.15.36|talk]]) 09:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I remember reading this as a kid. But I'm pretty sure it was in a magazine or maybe a school text book, and not a compilation of Bradbury stories. Is there any way to find out where all this story has been published in the past? [[Special:Contributions/209.91.15.36|209.91.15.36]] ([[User talk:209.91.15.36|talk]]) 09:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

==Themes and interpretation: this section is original research==

This section, while reasonable (I for example agree with the first paragraph about a child's mistrust of adults) is outside the scope of Wikipedia. We do not do literary analysis here. It also smells of original research, which is frowned upon. I will remove it in a few days, unless someone finds a way to re-work it as something backed by references... and references to scifi and Bradbury's work, not irrelevant medical articles. [[Special:Contributions/190.194.247.223|190.194.247.223]] ([[User talk:190.194.247.223|talk]]) 20:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:02, 14 September 2015

Untitled

Where Published

I remember reading this as a kid. But I'm pretty sure it was in a magazine or maybe a school text book, and not a compilation of Bradbury stories. Is there any way to find out where all this story has been published in the past? 209.91.15.36 (talk) 09:30, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Themes and interpretation: this section is original research

This section, while reasonable (I for example agree with the first paragraph about a child's mistrust of adults) is outside the scope of Wikipedia. We do not do literary analysis here. It also smells of original research, which is frowned upon. I will remove it in a few days, unless someone finds a way to re-work it as something backed by references... and references to scifi and Bradbury's work, not irrelevant medical articles. 190.194.247.223 (talk) 20:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]