Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Diva (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:59, 27 October 2015

Miss Diva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination on behalf of User:Sky Groove, who I will ask to come and provide a rationale. On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked the nominating editor for a rationale; if they don't post something here in, oh, a day or so, feel free to close this on a procedural basis. Thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 14:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 14:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 14:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be deleted because the neutrality of the article has been disputed and it has now become impossible to restore it moreover the article cite so many issues. Since past 1 year I have beem trying my best to make it issue free and neutral article but all the efforts went vain. Other users have also tried to improve the article to make it more reliable and encyclopedic but all their efforts also went vain for proof you can see the edit history. So its better that someone with better wikipedia knowledge and experience creates a new one from scratch for betterment of the users who are interested in the field of beauty pageants. At last its my humble request to delete this article as soon as possible for the betterment of the people who cannot get complete info.about the topic regarding this field from this article as the main/crucial info. Is missing from the page some other users have also tried to complete it but no effect was seen. Since past 1 year the article is at the sane stage where it was 1 year ago. So I would want to have it deleted for the sake of people who would not get any proper info. From it and let a more knowledgable and experienced user recreate it. Regards. Sky Groove (talk) 14:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see no obvious better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 15:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article suffers from a lack of neutrality and independent sources from version one. Unless the author proves that he can write an article about the pageant that is neutral in style and tone and with proper reliable sources (conform WP:RS), I think that there is no need for a new article at all. The Banner talk 17:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So I would request the admin to delete the article as soon as possible so that a better editor could create it again in order to provide a reliable and better view of this part of beauty pageants. Regards Sky Groove (talk) 12:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Indeed this event is highly notable and one of primary beauty contest of India. Article itself have several independent sources. Winner of this competition goes for Miss Universe. There is huge coverage of this event in all major media of India. You can simply see this news result. If there is any problem with neutrality of this article then that can be corrected but we can't delete this obvious deserving article. Even one of nominator Sky Groove is only talking about "neutrality" of the article and insisting for delete only to recreate it in more neutral way, I think this is not reason to delete this article, it can be improved. --Human3015^TALK 16:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As it has been mentioned twice that several efforts have been made by different users to restore its neutrality and improve it but no affect has seen so far and since one year the article is cutung issue and no one could improve it. Sky Groove (talk) 18:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Events|list of Events-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 14:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)</small>
 *'''Keep''': Indeed this event is highly notable and one of primary beauty contest of India. Article itself have several independent sources. Winner of this competition goes for [[Miss Universe]]. There is huge coverage of this event in all major media of India. You can simply [http://www.google.co.in/search?q=miss+diva&client=safari&rls=en&prmd=ivns&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0CAcQ_AVqFQoTCMPW8paN48gCFciQlAodvK0OCw see this news result]. If there is any problem with neutrality of this article then that can be corrected but we can't delete this obvious deserving article. Even one of nominator Sky Groove is only talking about "neutrality" of the article and insisting for delete only to recreate it in more neutral way, I think this is not reason to delete this article, it can be improved. --[[User:Human3015|'''<span style="color:#0000FF;">Human</span><span style="color:#808000 ;">3015</span>''']][[User talk:Human3015|<span style="color:#FF1493"><b><small><sup>TALK</sup></small></b></span>]]&nbsp; 16:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
+* As it has been mentioned twice that several efforts have been made by different users to restore its neutrality and improve it but no affect has seen so far and since one year the article is cutung issue and no one could improve it. [[User:Sky Groove|Sky Groove]] ([[User talk:Sky Groove|talk]]) 18:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)