Talk:Robert Fayrfax: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:22, 2 February 2016

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Middle Ages Start‑class

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Composers Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Merger proposal

No doubt they should be merged. However, there is not much sourced material in the Robert Fairfax (musician) article, so I am not sure what can reasonably be added here.--SabreBD (talk) 11:56, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected now. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"23 April 1464 – 24 October 1521"

with dates that precede adoption of the Gregorian system (most of Britain, 1752) it is customary, I think, to specify both Julian and Gregorian dates (see the article on Byrd, for example), at least if one can be fairly sure that one's sources, their sources and their sources have been careful in this regard (... erm. Or otherwise put... erm. :( ) Is there at least fairly good reason at least to suppose that these are Gregorian dates (as our policy does in fact require?) Schissel | Sound the Note! 03:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Under recordings it might be worth mentioning that the Missa Tecum Principium and the Motet Aeterna Laudis Lilium were recorded by the Ambrosian Singers (using a choir of 17 singers, apparently the number Fayrfax had at St Albans) under Denis Stevens, who later published his own edition of the work, in St George the Martyr, Queens Square, London on 5 July 1962 for the Schwann Musica Sacra Label, AMS 38. This may well have been the work's first recording.86.131.144.239 (talk) 11:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:06, 16 November 2015 edit Aboutmovies (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 411,372 edits m updated wikiproject WikiProject Biography «Start» ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:22, 2 February 2016 edit undo 86.131.144.239 (talk) Suggestion Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	with dates that precede adoption of the Gregorian system (most of Britain, 1752) it is customary, I think, to specify both Julian and Gregorian dates (see the article on Byrd, for example), at least if one can be fairly sure that one's sources, their sources and their sources have been careful in this regard (... erm. Or otherwise put... erm. :( ) Is there at least fairly good reason at least to suppose that these are Gregorian dates (as our policy ''does'' in fact require?) [[User:Schissel\|Schissel]] \| [[User_talk:Schissel\|Sound the Note!]] 03:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)		with dates that precede adoption of the Gregorian system (most of Britain, 1752) it is customary, I think, to specify both Julian and Gregorian dates (see the article on Byrd, for example), at least if one can be fairly sure that one's sources, their sources and their sources have been careful in this regard (... erm. Or otherwise put... erm. :( ) Is there at least fairly good reason at least to suppose that these are Gregorian dates (as our policy ''does'' in fact require?) [[User:Schissel\|Schissel]] \| [[User_talk:Schissel\|Sound the Note!]] 03:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

			Under recordings it might be worth mentioning that the Missa Tecum Principium and the Motet Aeterna Laudis Lilium were recorded by the Ambrosian Singers (using a choir of 17 singers, apparently the number Fayrfax had at St Albans) under Denis Stevens, who later published his own edition of the work, in St George the Martyr, Queens Square, London on 5 July 1962 for the Schwann Musica Sacra Label, AMS 38. This may well have been the work's first recording.[[Special:Contributions/86.131.144.239\|86.131.144.239]] ([[User talk:86.131.144.239\|talk]]) 11:21, 2 February 2016 (UTC)