Talk:Brock Osweiler: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:36, 9 March 2016

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brock Osweiler article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Sports and Games Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

College football Stub‑class Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Semi-protected edit request on 21 September 2015

Resolved

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

on several occasions in this bio...the NFL player Brock Osweiler is listed at 6 foot 8 inches. In the article itself, it has a detailed break down of Osweiler's "draft measurements" in which it says Osweiler is 6 foot 6 and 7/8s inches. I would like Osweiler to be listed at 6 foot 7 inches as a rounded number. stating that he is two different heights is not accurate, nor does it give Wikipedia, an encyclopedia known as more accurate than encyclopedia Britannica, a good reputation for quick facts. Now I know Osweiler is often referred to as 6 foot 8 but his draft measurements say it all, he is barely even 6 foot 7. Gavinhoy (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We simply go with what NFL.com/Broncos.com lists him as. Yes, he very well may be actually 6'7', but trying to guess every players real height based on old sources can result in WP:OR and edit warring, since most of them are exaggerated anyway. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He measured 6'6 7/8 at the 2012 NFL Combine, and the article has been multiply referenced to reflect his height at the more accurate rounded number of 6'7. Redthoreau -- (talk) 19:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which team

I've temporarily fully protected the page so you'll all have to talk about the team issue here, instead of edit warring on the article and run the risk of getting blocked. —SMALL JIM 21:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked User:Bdnh85 to write a short explanation of the issue here. —SMALL JIM 21:35, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did nothing wrong. Seems like a bunch of kids trying to change when the teams has yet to announce. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdnh85 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When is the announcement due? —SMALL JIM 21:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If he passes his physical it shouldn't be much longer. Fully protecting is a little too much I think.--Yankees10 21:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - there's no fixed date/time then. Regarding the page protection, just look at the recent edit history! It was necessary. —SMALL JIM 22:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 9 March 2016

It is requested that an edit be made to the fully protected article at Brock Osweiler. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately.

Edit requests to fully protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |answered=yes parameter to deactivate the template.

AND IS A HOMO TRAITER!

96.19.25.27 (talk) 22:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should thank me. If I had admin powers all the protections would be in place from the start

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 <!-- End request -->
 [[Special:Contributions/96.19.25.27|96.19.25.27]] ([[User talk:96.19.25.27|talk]]) 22:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
+You should thank me. If I had admin powers all the protections would be in place from the start