Jump to content

User talk:94.246.154.130: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:
k --[[Special:Contributions/94.246.154.130|94.246.154.130]] ([[User talk:94.246.154.130#top|talk]]) 13:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
k --[[Special:Contributions/94.246.154.130|94.246.154.130]] ([[User talk:94.246.154.130#top|talk]]) 13:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


{{unblock|reason=Again here, as some highly intelligent fellow blocked me for "block evading" when I followed the instructions.}}
{{unblock|reason=Again here, as some highly intelligent fellow blocked me for "Block evasion:" when I followed the instructions.}}

Revision as of 08:51, 28 September 2016

Wipsenade (talk) 18:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was, but may not be now.82.27.25.5 (talk) 06:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Mona Sax do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Mona Sax was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://maxpayne.wikia.com/wiki/Mona_Sax) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Hello, 94.246.154.130. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Portrayal of females in video games

Please discuss your removal of April Ryan in the talk page, there was consensus to have her included. Diego Moya (talk) 22:21, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You also removed the description of Custer's Revenge for no reason. Please be more careful when reverting content. Diego Moya (talk) 22:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Language

Don't Sware!86.24.9.104 (talk) 14:14, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apology to 94.246.154.130

Dear User: 94.246.154.130, I was referring to the edits made in 2008 and the deleted couple from 2009, not the edits from July 2011, which was after I put my comments up. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. Wipsenade (talk) 14:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC) It was never proven, so User:Vidboy10 was not the same person.Wipsenade (talk) 16:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


____

Just stop

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Fleet Command (talk) 17:15, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I thought you were too

They didn't even block you from what I said anyways. You just kept messing around and were really in bad faith. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 22:45, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

:-)82.27.25.5 (talk) 06:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Chechen people, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. List of notable people are standard on wp. The fact that a cat exists is not reason to delete a list. If you wish to add to the list, feel free. Epeefleche (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Chechen people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It is standard to have such lists of notable people, whether as stand-alone or embedded lists, and the existence of cats at the same time is not reason to delete such lists. See, e.g., List of Russian people and List of Polish people. And, as you see, the lists exist despite the existence of cats. Feel free to add to the list, as such lists by their nature are never complete, but do not delete appropriate entries from such lists or delete such lists in their entirety. Epeefleche (talk) 11:12, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

The block will last for 24 hours and includes all persons using this IP address. Gross incivility is banned on Wikipedia.--File Éireann 11:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you to allow you to comment on Sockpuppet enquiry.--File Éireann 12:53, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jacobo Árbenz may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • political interests; thus, unlike other Latin American nations such as Haiti, Nicaragua and Cuba] the U.S. did not have to use overt military force to maintain dominance in Guatemala. The

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 21:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Ain't evading, yo. Just wasn't blocked. No, I don't want unblock. --94.246.154.130 (talk) 10:10, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sup

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

94.246.154.130 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Unjust bullshit. [1]

Decline reason:

IP address is not blocked directly. If you are still unable to edit, please sign in to your account and request an unblock, providing the message that appears when you try to edit. Yamla (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

k --94.246.154.130 (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

94.246.154.130 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Again here, as some highly intelligent fellow blocked me for "Block evasion:" when I followed the instructions.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Again here, as some highly intelligent fellow blocked me for "Block evasion:" when I followed the instructions. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Again here, as some highly intelligent fellow blocked me for "Block evasion:" when I followed the instructions. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Again here, as some highly intelligent fellow blocked me for "Block evasion:" when I followed the instructions. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}