Jump to content

Talk:Nabil Bentaleb: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by 193.39.158.202 (talk) to last revision by BDD. (TW)
Line 9: Line 9:
:Yes, we do consider goal.com as a reliable source if no other sources can be found. --[[User:ArsenalFan700|ArsenalFan700]] ([[User talk:ArsenalFan700|talk]]) 17:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
:Yes, we do consider goal.com as a reliable source if no other sources can be found. --[[User:ArsenalFan700|ArsenalFan700]] ([[User talk:ArsenalFan700|talk]]) 17:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
::Hi IP 60, like ArsenalFan said Goal.com is considered a reliable source if it wasn't I wouldn't have added it, but good job on removing the [[WP:UNSOURCED|unsourced]] content initially. Obviously when sourcing a player's height a reference from the club's official website or from the premier league is preferable but when they're not available another rs like goal.com etc. is perfectly acceptable. Some websites like transfermarkt are not considered reliable and shouldn't be used to verify content. Hope you both are having a good festive period. &#9733;&#9734; [[User:DUCKISJAMMMY|<font color="Fuchsia">DUCK</font><font color="blue">IS</font><font color="Fuchsia">JAMMMY</font>]]&#9734;&#9733; 18:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
::Hi IP 60, like ArsenalFan said Goal.com is considered a reliable source if it wasn't I wouldn't have added it, but good job on removing the [[WP:UNSOURCED|unsourced]] content initially. Obviously when sourcing a player's height a reference from the club's official website or from the premier league is preferable but when they're not available another rs like goal.com etc. is perfectly acceptable. Some websites like transfermarkt are not considered reliable and shouldn't be used to verify content. Hope you both are having a good festive period. &#9733;&#9734; [[User:DUCKISJAMMMY|<font color="Fuchsia">DUCK</font><font color="blue">IS</font><font color="Fuchsia">JAMMMY</font>]]&#9734;&#9733; 18:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Regarding the reliability of sources, but the FA and Spurs were showing Harry Kane's weight at 65kgs. You would think they would know. My point is of course, that if the data is not really important, then perhaps consideration might be given to not including it to begin with and then there is no question of the reliability of sources.[[Special:Contributions/46.7.85.68|46.7.85.68]] ([[User talk:46.7.85.68|talk]]) 12:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)


==Copyright problem removed==
==Copyright problem removed==

Revision as of 12:10, 7 January 2017

Height

As a footballer's wiki, what counts as acceptable biographical webstie sources? Currently Bentalebs Height is sourced from "goal.com". Is this considered reliable? I would only ever consider the official club website to be reliable of which Tottenham have no height record for him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.5.113 (talk) 17:31, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we do consider goal.com as a reliable source if no other sources can be found. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 17:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi IP 60, like ArsenalFan said Goal.com is considered a reliable source if it wasn't I wouldn't have added it, but good job on removing the unsourced content initially. Obviously when sourcing a player's height a reference from the club's official website or from the premier league is preferable but when they're not available another rs like goal.com etc. is perfectly acceptable. Some websites like transfermarkt are not considered reliable and shouldn't be used to verify content. Hope you both are having a good festive period. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 18:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the reliability of sources, but the FA and Spurs were showing Harry Kane's weight at 65kgs. You would think they would know. My point is of course, that if the data is not really important, then perhaps consideration might be given to not including it to begin with and then there is no question of the reliability of sources.46.7.85.68 (talk) 12:10, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.soccersouls.com/2014/01/tottenhams-bentaleb-provides-hope-for-the-future-scout-report/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 08:08, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]