User talk:Winged Blades of Godric

Welcome to My Talk Page! Hello! and Welcome to my talk-page! I am Godric. I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm always happy to help. Alternatively, type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Resources Finding your way around: Table of contents / Department directory The Wikipedia Adventure--an interactive tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia. Need quick help? Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's writing script. Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's founding principles. Frequently Asked Questions - see if it quenches your query:) The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. Resolving disputes - if the going gets tough! Request administrator attention - invoke the high and mighty:) Let's get a bit more detailed Guide to Wikipedia – the epic manual.   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   How to develop an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not How you can help: Community portal – a list of interesting things to do at Wikipedia.Find your area of expertise and indulge... Join a WikiProject--and seek your interests actively! Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create new articles   the definitive guide to create an article Do's and Dont's   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool! Edit existing articles, before you make your own.   Do maintain a neutral point of view Do cite reliable sources Do build consensus when challenged   Don't do any original research   Don't spam and abstain from promoting anything.   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Do not revert others blindly   Do not violate Biographies of living person policy   Do not create multiple accounts If you need further help:   Ask a question or you can:   Get accustomed or you can:  get live help at IRC or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you Final reminders Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you. Sincerely, ~ Winged BladesGodric 04:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia ads file info – show another – #3 Please sign your message. Find a random AfC submission AfC Backlog Level 10 3-month backlog at AFC. There are currently 2,564 pending submissions. [view • purge • update] . Hi - regarding my article on Prof Dr Suresh David Hi, Thanks for reviewing the article. I understand biographies of living ppl is difficult. I have tried keeping to the norms with the help of people whom i know and some really helpful ones on Wikipedia. Could you please give some suggestions when you find some time.? Thank you Naepin (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC) @Naepin:--Will be replying soon.Winged Blades Godric 17:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Thank you, waiting for your reply Naepin (talk) 11:50, 15 April 2017 (UTC) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjeev Dua Can you please revert your WP:BADNAC there? This closure is contentious, AND it is a close call. Also, it looks more like a WP:SUPERVOTE than a proper closure.Burning Pillar (talk) 04:20, 18 April 2017 (UTC) @Burning Pillar:-- Not done-- Dua has umpired 5 Women's One Day International cricket matches.Read the first point of WP:NCRICKET.Harrias's vote seemed to be on the premise that he was a domestic-level umpire (due to an apparent lack of sources)--which now stands refuted.And an ARFD discussion is not the right place to assert the presumption of notability in WP:NCRICKET seems to be false.Winged Blades Godric 04:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC) 04:50:59, 19 April 2017 review of submission by Gitakrishna Gitakrishna (talk · contribs) Draft:Jugpreet Bajwa (2) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) @Gitakrishna:--Sorry, but I don't get your point.I simply declined the draft and moved it to a different name in the draft-space per WP:MOS and draft-naming conventions.And these actions could be taken unilaterally irrespective of views of another AFC reviewer.And I didn't delete anything.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 05:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC) Feel free to contact if you need any more advice/help.Winged Blades Godric 05:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC) (edit conflict) Comment: Reply to 'Winged Blades of Godric': Please view the "Note by Author" at the beginning of the Draft Article on Jugpreet. I hope the following would clarify my point, please. If an athlete wins a Gold Medal in Commonwealth Games, he is a notable person -- even if there is no other ‘Reference’ to him except the one on the official website of Commonwealth Games. Similarly, when out of almost half the population of the World (the total population of Commonwealth Countries is about half the World’s population) the Queen of England, who heads the Commonwealth, selects Jugpreet Bajwa for an Award, and the 'Reference' to the said Award is available on the official website of the Governor General of Canada, then Jugpreet is a noteworthy (notable) person. Moreso, the 2nd Runners up of the popular International Reality Music Show ‘Sa Re Ga Ma Pa 2016’ (whose Judges & Jury Members are well-known Singers, Music Composers & Lyricists in Bollywood -- the second largest Film-Industry in the World) is surely a noteworthy person -- Jugpreet was the 2nd Runners up in the said Competition. In the instant case, one Commentator says that 'Notability' has been established, but another had differed earlier (albeit when certain ‘References’ were not cited), i.e. there was a one-to-one tie. Hence, please place this Article for a discussion amongst Senior Editors -- considering that I am a Senior Editor/ Peer-Reviewer of 3 prestigious International Academic Research Journals, including the one that is published for Cambridge University (UK); these Journals are cited as reliable "sources" for secondary research (for PhD & Post-PhD Programmes) whereas Wikipedia is not considered such a source by the International Research Community. Thanks in Advance! Gitakrishna Mamata Banerje I just want to know what did you find that makes the calcutta high court's order , non neutral. I have read many articles on Wikipedia. I think that wikipedia is not just about praising someone but also to tell the facts that exist. It is a fact that the bengal government took the decision of banning the durga puja immersion after 4pm. And the Court said that is Muslim appeasement. You can read the pages of other politicians like Shivraj Singh Chauhan, yogi adityanath, Mulayam Singh etc. Some of them even have a seperate section like" corruption ", " controversy" and have all the events related to that person. So please explain to me how is info added by me on Mamata Banerjee's page non-neutral. 59.97.83.156 (talk) 07:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC) @59.97.83.156:--See WP:WEIGHT.Also, a fact can be conveyed in thousand different manners.Cheerio!Winged Blades Godric 07:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC) And please create an user-account given that your IP is remarkably dynamic and our memories are not so good!Winged Blades Godric 07:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 10:17:15, 19 April 2017 review of submission by TGSTINT TGSTINT (talk · contribs) Draft:Jennifer Turner (musician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) I may agree with the first decline of my draft submission as i had only "normal" online sources. I may disagree with the second decline of my draft submission as i had handchecked every author of the used online sources for its work in professional journalism. I totally disagree with your recent decline of my draft submission as i added only sources from handchecked (and prominent) books and magazines (even with linked wikipedia articles) - written by professional journalists and published by well know publishers. So please explain me why (besides all the online articles by professional journalists - all mentioned in the references): 1. To find the person i write about in the biggest Encyclopidia there is about modern music is not showing notability? (I also linked to the wikipedia entry of the main author and to the encyclopedia...) 2. A whole section in a book about Guitar Styles is not enough? (alongside Sheryl Crow, Tracy Chapman, Fleetwood Mac and other musicians half the world knows..) is not enough to show a notability? 3. A whole article in one of the most known and established music magazine besides maybe the Rolling Stone is not enough to show a notability? 4. Several articles in THE most known magazine about female musicians - which is know archieved by Harvard University as "American Women’s History artifacts" does not show enough notability?? So you actually went to several libraries several times like I and reviewed all those sources before declining the submit? Or how did you check those? How does any of these sources not fullfill the guidelines showing notability? Because i cant see any point in the guidlines telling me that they do not show notability and reliability. If these sources, books and magazine articles are not enough - please show me ANY source that shows notability more than ONE of the four i mentioned above for any kind of artists - as i can not see what else besides articles, magazine articles and books can show more the notability of a person. How can you show notability if after online works of professional journalists are not enough - and also articles in magazines written by professional journalists and published worldwide and books and encyclopedias written by professionals who have done this job their whole life are not enough to be considered notable and reliable? As I just had a longer chat with some other reviewers in irc and none of them could see the reason for declining the draft - im asking you to please elaborate your reasons for declining - as they are not comprehensible only for me - but also for others.