Talk:L. Sprague de Camp: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:29, 24 May 2017

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States B‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Skepticism B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Science Fiction B‑class High‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Word choice

"De Camp's frank and judicious approach to his subjects has been branded by some fans, particularly those of Lovecraft, as unflattering and unbalanced." I'm curious about 'judicious' in this sentence - is it meant to suggest that De Camp is not shy about making judgements? That would seem to go hand in hand with 'frank,' but judicious means one shows good judgement, not that one judges. Of course, 'judgmental' is pejorative, if the intent is merely to suggest'unshy of passing judgment.' But, there are other options, 'blunt,' 'bald,' 'trenchant' etc.

If it is meant merely to suggest that De Camp was right and some fans are special pleading for their author, then I question the good faith of the passage to begin with; at the very least that sort of sentiment should be laid out more explicitly. Contrasting judicious criticism with the branding of fans is a bit weaselly. I suspect, however, it's a mere matter of wording. 142.177.46.214 23:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The hardbound version of de Camp's biography of Lovecraft has a very rich resource in its footnotes; the paperback version was published without the footnotes.Naaman Brown (talk) 01:47, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A short list of seminal works?

I agree with separating the full bibliography into its own article, but should we have a condensed list of seminal works here in the main article? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 09:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My thought is yes, we should, so I've put one in. BPK 15:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

H. S. de Camp

Is there any relation to Horace Silliman de Camp of New York who married Titanic widow Mary Farquarson Marvin in 1913? He was born about 1887 and died on July 15, 1954 in Thendara, New York. De Camp and Marvin had two children, a daughter, Julia Janet de Camp (* 1918), and a son (* 1920). OfficeBoy (talk) 10:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where's it from?

Either someone is doing a bit of very nice analysis and original research, or there are good sources. Anyone know which it is? 74.43.68.247 (talk) 18:07, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The latter. I've added a few more sources to some of the non-analytic material. Will continue sourcing as time permits. BPK (talk) 20:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conan the Barbarian

Perhaps Conan the Barbarian should be mentioned in the lead. Perhaps de Camp should be somewhere in categories Conan the Barbarian and Robert E. Howard.

Certainly de Camp's revival of Conan and Howard needs more coverage. (And the Howard navbox should include Conan the Barbarian whom I don't find there.)

--P64 (talk) 21:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

De Camp's involvement in Conan was just one aspect of a long, multi-faceted writing career, so I'm not sure it merits being mentioned in the lead. More coverage in the body of the article would probably be desirable.

Looking into the Conan and Howard categories, the first includes no authors and the latter only authors so closely identified with Howard (Mark Finn, Glenn Lord, Novaline Price), that the identification is really their only claim to significance. I don't see a good reason for putting de Camp in either category, particularly since his significance as an author was not dependent on Howard. I think de Camp's appearances in the navboxes Conan the Barbarian and Robert E. Howard adequately fit the bill here.

The Howard navbox apparently doesn't include Conan because it was split at some point between the box about Howard and a box on Works by Robert E. Howard. Conan is included in the latter.

BPK (talk) 13:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I added Conan to a section heading of the former --now "Books about Howard or Conan the Barbarian" which certainly fits the listed books-- and added a cross-reference notice to the biography talk and both template talks, eg Template talk: Robert E. Howard 2#The other navigation box.

--P64 (talk) 15:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

De Camp's involvement with Conan is covered more extensively in the article Robert E. Howard's legacy. --BPK (talk) 13:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a long time fan of Robert Howard, I deem De Camp's contribution wholly negative. De Camp's completions, editings, and fatuous comments have, at best, no value; moreover readers unacquainted with De Camp's activities, may not distinguish between Howard's work and the De Camp additions.

Flags Removed

This page was flagged for lack of citations/references. Since the flag notice(s) were posted, other editors have added references. I added some new ones as well, along with new content. Any further suggestions/updates welcome.--SojoQ (talk) 00:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on L. Sprague de Camp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110701114233/http://www.sfwa.org/nebula-awards/nebula-weekend/events-program/grandmaster/ to http://www.sfwa.org/nebula-awards/nebula-weekend/events-program/grandmaster/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 ::De Camp's involvement with Conan is covered more extensively in the article [[Robert E. Howard's legacy]]. --[[User:BPK2|BPK]] ([[User talk:BPK2|talk]]) 13:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
+As a long time fan of Robert Howard, I deem De Camp's contribution wholly negative. De Camp's completions, editings, and fatuous comments have, at best, no value; moreover readers unacquainted with De Camp's activities, may not distinguish between Howard's work and the De Camp additions.
 == Flags Removed ==