Jump to content

Talk:Thomas Blamey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
Line 43: Line 43:
::I believe you have missed my sarcasm. Both of the articles appear to me (a non-military historian admittedly) as puff pieces. Please keep your puff pieces consistent mate. [[User:CactusFlower|CactusFlower]] ([[User talk:CactusFlower|talk]]) 22:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
::I believe you have missed my sarcasm. Both of the articles appear to me (a non-military historian admittedly) as puff pieces. Please keep your puff pieces consistent mate. [[User:CactusFlower|CactusFlower]] ([[User talk:CactusFlower|talk]]) 22:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
:::[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe {{#switch:{{Trunc|{{LC:article}}|1}}|a|i|e|o|u=an article|#default=a {{{type}}}}} needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a [[wiki]], so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the '''edit this page''' link at the top.<br /> The Wikipedia community encourages you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|'''be bold''' in updating pages]]. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out [[Wikipedia:how to edit a page|''how to edit a page'']], or use the [[Draft:Sandbox|sandbox]] to try out your editing skills. [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|New contributors are always welcome]]. You don't even need to [[Special:Userlogin|log in]] (although there are [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|many reasons you might want to]]). [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 08:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
:::[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe {{#switch:{{Trunc|{{LC:article}}|1}}|a|i|e|o|u=an article|#default=a {{{type}}}}} needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a [[wiki]], so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the '''edit this page''' link at the top.<br /> The Wikipedia community encourages you to [[Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages|'''be bold''' in updating pages]]. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out [[Wikipedia:how to edit a page|''how to edit a page'']], or use the [[Draft:Sandbox|sandbox]] to try out your editing skills. [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|New contributors are always welcome]]. You don't even need to [[Special:Userlogin|log in]] (although there are [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|many reasons you might want to]]). [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 08:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
::::I am as you know quite new. But yet I have seen this duplicitous ploy of "then you fix it" in other places. I am not a historian. I do not have access to the sources required. But you are quite happy to see a one sided (and perhaps untruthful) article because of that? Okay mate. Take a look at what a "military historian" responsible for a lot of these articles lied about or misinterpreted on [[Charles Moses]]. Then tell me I am wrong to suspect puffiness. [[User:CactusFlower|CactusFlower]] ([[User talk:CactusFlower|talk]]) 17:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:34, 6 August 2017

Featured articleThomas Blamey is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starThomas Blamey is part of the Command in the South West Pacific Area series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 24, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 30, 2011WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
March 28, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
December 23, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

RE: Salamaua–Lae Campaign

From the lede: "Blamey also planned and carried out the significant and victorious Salamaua–Lae Campaign." In the article on the Salamaua–Lae Campaign he is hardly mentioned at all: only a neutral to somewhat negative mention in the aftermath section. Can some fine historian determine which of these articles is BS? (Sarcasm intended.) CactusFlower (talk) 22:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Salamaua-Lae campaign article is currently under-developed and needs a lot of work. Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:21, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you have missed my sarcasm. Both of the articles appear to me (a non-military historian admittedly) as puff pieces. Please keep your puff pieces consistent mate. CactusFlower (talk) 22:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons you might want to). Nick-D (talk) 08:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am as you know quite new. But yet I have seen this duplicitous ploy of "then you fix it" in other places. I am not a historian. I do not have access to the sources required. But you are quite happy to see a one sided (and perhaps untruthful) article because of that? Okay mate. Take a look at what a "military historian" responsible for a lot of these articles lied about or misinterpreted on Charles Moses. Then tell me I am wrong to suspect puffiness. CactusFlower (talk) 17:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]