Talk:Cyrillization of Chinese: Difference between revisions
→Wrong title or wrong content: new section |
Attention drawn to almost certainly incorrect sample text!~~~~ |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Russian is not the only language using the Cyrillic script. Although Ukrainian and Belarussian use the same system with some differences, South Slavic languages use something closer to Pinyin. --[[Special:Contributions/2.245.251.253|2.245.251.253]] ([[User talk:2.245.251.253|talk]]) 16:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC) |
Russian is not the only language using the Cyrillic script. Although Ukrainian and Belarussian use the same system with some differences, South Slavic languages use something closer to Pinyin. --[[Special:Contributions/2.245.251.253|2.245.251.253]] ([[User talk:2.245.251.253|talk]]) 16:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Wrong sample text! == |
|||
Whatever the Chinese sample text is, it certainly has nothing to do with Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The first three words mean "How are you?", and the last one means "Chinese" (the language). I suspect this is an out-of-office reply from whoever normally does Chinese translations for this writer, meaning "Hello - I'm away just now, but please send me any texts you need for translation into Chinese". I'm guessing this, but something similar happened recently when a Welsh city needed a bilingual traffic sign, and the out-of-office message got printed on the sign as if it were the required translation - whoever received the reply couldn't read Welsh and simply assumed it was correct! I've looked at the Chinese version of Article 1 of the declaration, and not only is it much longer, but it looks nothing like the text shown here. The Cyrillic transliteration does match the pinyin text.[[Special:Contributions/89.212.50.177|89.212.50.177]] ([[User talk:89.212.50.177|talk]]) 12:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:50, 27 December 2017
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 June 2004. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
![]() | The contents of the Cyrillization of Chinese from pinyin page were merged into Cyrillization of Chinese. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
![]() | The contents of the Cyrillization of Chinese from Wade-Giles page were merged into Cyrillization of Chinese. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
|
lost interlang
When the two pages were merged here, these interlang links were lost:
76.66.202.10 (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Interlang corrections:
replaced by
76.66.202.10 (talk) 17:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Expand
- I think that bopomofo (Zhuyin) should be added to the table.
- There should be a comparison done between this and the Cyrillization method used for Dungan.
- Other non-Palladius systems should also be mentioned.
76.66.202.10 (talk) 16:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Date query
When did was the Cyrillization system created and when did it come into use? Languagehat (talk) 16:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Wrong title or wrong content
Russian is not the only language using the Cyrillic script. Although Ukrainian and Belarussian use the same system with some differences, South Slavic languages use something closer to Pinyin. --2.245.251.253 (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Wrong sample text!
Whatever the Chinese sample text is, it certainly has nothing to do with Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The first three words mean "How are you?", and the last one means "Chinese" (the language). I suspect this is an out-of-office reply from whoever normally does Chinese translations for this writer, meaning "Hello - I'm away just now, but please send me any texts you need for translation into Chinese". I'm guessing this, but something similar happened recently when a Welsh city needed a bilingual traffic sign, and the out-of-office message got printed on the sign as if it were the required translation - whoever received the reply couldn't read Welsh and simply assumed it was correct! I've looked at the Chinese version of Article 1 of the declaration, and not only is it much longer, but it looks nothing like the text shown here. The Cyrillic transliteration does match the pinyin text.89.212.50.177 (talk) 12:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Start-Class China-related articles
- Mid-importance China-related articles
- Start-Class China-related articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- Start-Class Russia articles
- Mid-importance Russia articles
- Mid-importance Start-Class Russia articles
- Start-Class Russia (language and literature) articles
- Language and literature of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- Start-Class Writing system articles
- Low-importance Writing system articles
- Start-Class language articles
- Unknown-importance language articles
- WikiProject Languages articles
- Start-Class Central Asia articles
- Low-importance Central Asia articles
- WikiProject Central Asia articles