User talk:Bradv

---

Messages

---

• Please help keep discussions together.

• If I left you a message on your talk page, please reply there (and ping me}.
• If you leave me a message on my talk page, I will answer here.
• If you have already started a conversation on this page, please reply there.

Click here to begin a new topic

• Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
• View or search the archives for old messages.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

---

Links

---

• Quick directory
• Department directory
• Community Portal
• Maintenance
• Requests
• Tips
• Tools

---

Need Help?

---

• The Teahouse
• Articles for Creation Help Desk

---

Policies and Guidelines

---

Editor of the Week

Editor Worm That Turned submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Bradv to be Editor of the Week for a number of reasons. I first came across Bradv when he was trying to fix a tag and ended up mediating a dispute admirably. Looking at his contributions (10.000 edits plus), he spends the majority of his time helping, be it at the Teahouse or at Articles for Creation. He has been away for a while, but has recently returned and I'd like it known how much his work is appreciated.

Bradv

Improves the encyclopedia

Editor of the Week for the week beginning May 8, 2016

10K to mainspace, uses the summary 97% of the time, recently re-activated, fights vandalism. The majority of his time is spent helping other editors.

Recognized for

Fighting Vandalism

Nomination page

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk 19:34, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

• Congrats! Welcome back, thank you for your help and hope you stay around. - NQ (talk) 21:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
• Congrats! Nice job. (And thank you for reviewing my AfC Draft:Maryland Psychiatric Society. I will improve the sources.) Drdaviss (talk) 00:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

02:34:00, 11 January 2018 review of submission by Seriouskind

• Seriouskind (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Nawaf Obaid (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, Bradv. Thanks for reviewing my page. Can you tell me what you think I need to add in order to make the page publishable?

Thanks!

Seriouskind (talk) 02:34, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Hertz

The cite you restored is a gossip column, with a probable COI pesence on Wiki. Anmccaff (talk) 04:01, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

There were three references removed, and now I've added the same content back with some different references. If you still object, please explain yourself at Talk:John D. Hertz. Bradv 04:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Grand Prix of Literary Associations (More sources and fresh info in the second section)

Hello Bradv! Still related to your recommendations, the second section of the article mentioned on headline has been improved ("Other GPLA Prizes"), with new sources and more fresh info, in addition to the changes I've done in my last edit (see my previous post on this page). Hope this will be enough to get your template removed, otherwise, kindly tell me what is still to be done to improve that page. Thanks in advance. --Morgoko (talk) 20:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pink tide

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pink tide. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Ten years of editing, today.

Hey, Bradv. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Bradv,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

19:25:32, 24 January 2018 review of submission by MrVanDigital

• MrVanDigital (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Nikolas Badminton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Bradv. I want to ask in what areas I should improve this article draft? I've read the notability guidelines and am convinced this person fits the criteria. Nikolas is Canada's most in-demand futurist, which is a very in-vogue profession that is helping businesses, thought leaders and politicians get to grips with technology and its future impact on society, work and culture. If it is citations where the submission is weak, I will attempt to redo and link to more respected links. Nikolas has appeared on many news stations recently (TV and radio) throughout Canada and I could link to these. He also created a '2018 Trends Report' that is being mentioned a lot in the media. I could also delete some of the history of Nikolas if this is less important? Before starting the rewrite, I would like a few more guidelines to help me. MrVanDigital (talk) 19:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)