Talk:Avawatz Mountains: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:26, 25 January 2018

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

California: Inland Empire / Southern California Start‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Inland Empire task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Mountains Start‑class Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Geography Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

NAME

The article states "The name 'Avawatz' is derived from the Mohave Indian term 'Avi-Ahwat', or 'red rock.'" The Yuman (Mohave / Mojave) word 'ahwat (with the apostrophe) means "to be red." However, this is not where the name Avawatz comes from: the Mohave did not name the mountain range Avi-Ahwat. The Southern Paiute gave the mountain range the name. The Numic name is from the word "aviwats" or "avawats," which means "gypsum" (white clay). The Yuman and Numic words are coincidentally similar.

The name issue is complicated by two problems: early maps, dating to year 1891, show the Avawatz range being named "Ivawatch;" and, the Southern Paiutes were probably describing the Kingston Mountain Range, not the Avawatz Mountain Range, when telling early Americans what they called various geographic places. That is, the 1891 map named the wrong mountain range: the Kingston mountains are the aviwats, not the Avawatz mountains. --Desertphile (talk) 03:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elevation

The article's body says that the highest elevation is some 6,000+ feet. But the graphic states that the highest elevation is somewhat lower. This needs to be resolved. Doug (talk) 13:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the elevation. 1,872.7 meters, based on my hand-held GPS receiver and the average of 1,100 3D positioning records. --Desertphile (talk) 03:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Name section is once again wrong

Some people have stated authoritatively, "The name 'Avawatz' is derived from the Mohave Indian term 'Avi-Ahwat', or 'red rock.'" The Yuman (Mohave / Mojave) word 'ahwat (with the apostrophe) means "to be red." However, this is not where the name Avawatz comes from: the Mohave did not name the mountain range Avi-Ahwat. The Southern Paiutes gave the mountain range the name. The Numic name is from the word "aviwats" or "avawats," which means "gypsum" (white clay). The Yuman and Numic words are coincidentally similar.

The name issue is complicated by two problems: early maps, dating to year 1891, show the Avawatz range being named "Ivawatch." The Southern Paiutes were probably describing the Kingston Mountain Range, not the Avawatz Mountain Range, when telling early Americans what they called various geographic places. That is, the 1891 map named the wrong mountain range: the Kingston mountains are the aviwats, not the Avawatz mountains.

The three citations given are known to be wrong. "California Place Names" was cited, yet it does not state "white sheep" is a fact. --Desertphile (talk) 23:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:22, 25 January 2018 edit Desertphile (talk \| contribs) 295 edits →‎Name section is once again wrong: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:26, 25 January 2018 edit undo Desertphile (talk \| contribs) 295 edits →‎Name section is once again wrong Next edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	The name issue is complicated by two problems: early maps, dating to year 1891, show the Avawatz range being named "Ivawatch." The Southern Paiutes were probably describing the Kingston Mountain Range, not the Avawatz Mountain Range, when telling early Americans what they called various geographic places. That is, the 1891 map named the wrong mountain range: the Kingston mountains are the aviwats, not the Avawatz mountains.		The name issue is complicated by two problems: early maps, dating to year 1891, show the Avawatz range being named "Ivawatch." The Southern Paiutes were probably describing the Kingston Mountain Range, not the Avawatz Mountain Range, when telling early Americans what they called various geographic places. That is, the 1891 map named the wrong mountain range: the Kingston mountains are the aviwats, not the Avawatz mountains.

	The three citations given are known to be wrong. "California Place Names" was cited, yet it does not state ~~what~~ ~~the~~ ~~article~~ ~~claims~~ ~~it states~~. --[[User:Desertphile\|Desertphile]] ([[User talk:Desertphile\|talk]]) 23:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)		The three citations given are known to be wrong. "California Place Names" was cited, yet it does not state "white sheep" is a fact. --[[User:Desertphile\|Desertphile]] ([[User talk:Desertphile\|talk]]) 23:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)