Talk:Bullshit: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2012; 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2019; 2020;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:26, 12 March 2018

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business Start‑class High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Linguistics: Philosophy of language Start‑class Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Marketing & Advertising Start‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Philosophy: Logic / Language Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Philosophy of language

Etymology

The etymology section in this article is within the scope of the Etymology task force, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of etymology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EtymologyWikipedia:WikiProject Linguistics/EtymologyTemplate:Etymology sectionEtymology articles

Etymology

The term bullshit isn't a simple portmanteau?? 68.173.113.106 (talk) 19:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is probably true of 20th century American usage, but the term has complex origins. "Bull" was in use in England from the sixteenth century onwards meaning nonsense, presumably from Papal bull. The American usage spread back to Britain in the second half of the twentieth century. --Ef80 (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"those monstrous opinions to be found in the Roman dunghill of decretals." - Martin Luther, 1520 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wikUZu9des&t=42m30s Featherwinglove (talk) 00:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--

The "bull" in "bullshit" is unrelated the "bull" meaning "a ludicrous jest." It is, as suggested, a portmanteau of "bull" (n.1 in the OED) "the male of any bovine animal", and "shit."

According to the OED, the "ludicrous jest" version (n.4) is is not derived from Papal Bull:

"No foundation appears for the guess that the word originated in ‘a contemptuous allusion to papal edicts’, nor for the assertion of the ‘British Apollo’ (No. 22. 1708) that ‘it became a Proverb from the repeated Blunders of one Obadiah Bull, a Lawyer of London, who liv'd in the Reign of K. Henry the Seventh’."

I'm sorry, but I don't know how to cite the OED, as I have the electronic version. Sudont (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--

Oh wait, I take that back. This is how they have in the OED:

[f. bull n.1 + shit n.]

1.1 Rubbish, nonsense; = bull n.4 3.

First they have it in the n.1 sense, then in the n.4 sense just below, so I'm not sure. Sudont (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What of the use of bullshit in the literal sense, as a noun for cow feces? The usage of bullshit, cowshit, chickenshit, etc on farms and in rural areas is fairly common and without vulgar context in these scenarios. 72.192.115.161 (talk) 15:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

see Manure. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific study about why some people buy BS

This might be relevant to this bullshit article (lol!), or perhaps to others on Wikipedia.

Here is the original study

and here is some coverage it got in the media

I hope this is helpful! SarrCat ∑;3 01:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'although "bullshit" is more common'

I'm not sure about that, I'm English and only hear bullshit from Americans, and hear bollocks quite regularly. I would suggest removing that sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TraitorBagel (talk • contribs) 13:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest removing the whole sentence. It is unsupported and doesn't add anything useful. --Boson (talk) 16:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Much older concept

The asymmetry principle was already popular much before Brandolini's mentions. It seems unfair to forget the original blog post -actually, a rerun of a previous one- by Uriel Fanelli (in Italian, NSFW): https://web.archive.org/web/20110627060407/http://www.keinpfusch.net/2010/03/la-teoria-della-montagna-di-merda.html.

Though not using the same terminology, the concept is definitely the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newbrain63 (talk • contribs) 09:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bullcrap

I'm an American and I've never heard anyone say "bullcrap". Honestly it's total BS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.151.173.219 (talk) 08:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who put the bull in papal?

How sacrilegious, how crude! The "bulls" of the Most Holy Papal See of Rome must be striken, yes striken, from this article at once! I am absolutely devastated. How could you? ;-) Scott P. (talk) 04:45, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Calling bullshit on the bullshit asymmetry principle

The "Bullshit Asymmetry Principle" was already formulated by Economist Roy Radner in 1993 [1]. In his paper, he considered the performance of an organization that processes information in terms of (1) number of processors required to review data items and (2) the time delays associated with processing data items. These factors are considered as a function of (A) the number data items to process and (B) the rate at which they arrive. In this paper, Rader related the number of data items to be processed to the number of processors as well as the delays associated with processing the same number of data items. He establishes lower bounds for both relations and finds that the number of processors is at least proportional to the number of items to be processed and its not possible to maintain a constant delay with an increase in data items - there are strong decrease in the returns to scale with respect delays as the number of data items grows.

There might be objections that this considers the effort to get rid of bullshit. The effort involved in resolving the quality of goods or services has already been considered in the economic literature in terms of Search goods and experience goods.

I suppose one might argue that the length of this comment is an example of the bullshit asymmetry principle. But considering that a simple counter-example can refute a bullshit system composed of perhaps an infinite number of statements, I wouldn't make too much of it. At most this is a vague meme that caught on with twitter users.

More interesting: does it take more effort to look up to see the color of the sky or to say "the sky looks hot pink"?

[1] Radner, R. (1993). The Organization of Decentralized Information Processing. Econometrica, 61(5), 1109-1146. doi:10.2307/2951495 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cabaez (talk • contribs) 08:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 March 2018

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Bullshit. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

218.188.214.62 (talk) 09:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Word forms: 3rd person singular present tense bullshits , present participle bullshitting , past tense, past participle bullshitted 1. uncountable noun If you say that something is bullshit, you are saying that it is nonsense or completely untrue. [informal, rude, disapproval] All the rest I said, all that was bullshit. 2. verb If you say that someone is bullshitting you, you mean that what they are telling you is nonsense or completely untrue. [informal, rude] Don't bullshit me, Brian! [VERB noun] He's basically bullshitting. [VERB] It means exaggerated or foolish talk; nonsense.