Jump to content

User talk:James Lawrie: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Yes: bullshit
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Welcome!'''
'''Welcome!'''
{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Look everyone. I am sorry for deleting things I realise now that this was a violation of wikipedia's spirit of knowledge. I realise that if everyone acted the way I acted wikipedia would be a very different place to the one it is now. I promise that if you unblock me I will make positive contributions to wikipedia. [[User:James Lawrie|James Lawrie]] ([[User talk:James Lawrie#top|talk]]) 21:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC) ~~~~''}}
{{unblock|2=reason=''Look everyone. I am sorry for deleting things I realise now that this was a violation of wikipedia's spirit of knowledge. I realise that if everyone acted the way I acted wikipedia would be a very different place to the one it is now. I promise that if you unblock me I will make positive contributions to wikipedia. [[User:James Lawrie|James Lawrie]] ([[User talk:James Lawrie#top|talk]]) 21:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC) ~~~~''}}
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|your contributions]]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/{{BASEPAGENAME}}|your contributions]]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
*[[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction]] and [[Help:Getting started|Getting started]]
*[[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction]] and [[Help:Getting started|Getting started]]

Revision as of 21:40, 11 April 2018

Welcome!

 
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

James Lawrie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hello, James Lawrie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 21:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Information icon Hello, James Lawrie. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Hi! The problem we have with NK Forster Guitars is that, under Wikipedia's Terms of Use, people paid to edit articles need to disclose their relationship with their client to help manage potential problems. This doesn't mean that you can't be paid to edit here, (although it is strongly suggested by the COI guidelines that you make suggestions rather than editing the articles directly), just that Wikipedia requires disclosure. Thus it is asked that paid editors add a note to their user page stating the employer, client and affiliation, and ideally to put a small note on the top of the article's talk page - basic instructions are at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#Paid_editors. - Bilby (talk) 13:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Messages go on users' talk pages and not user pages as you did here. Your final warning and "do not mess with me" is also uncalled for. --NeilN talk to me 13:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mess with me?

Really?--Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’m a very busy guy

Look everyone. I’m a very busy man. I just happen to be very passionate about British guitar companies. I actually work as a checkout clerk at my local Sainsbury’s so there is no conflict of interest going on. James Lawrie (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Stop removing the {{COI}} template from NK Forster Guitars before you're blocked. It's not "vexatious". Bishonen | talk 17:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Why are you bullying me

This clearly amounts to bullying? Is it because I’m from an ethnic minority? James Lawrie (talk) 18:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, you are resorting to accusations of racism when editors have no idea what ethnicity you are? --NeilN talk to me 18:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

So do I need to provide a citation to prove my ethnicity now? James Lawrie (talk) 19:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That was either obtuse or obnoxious or just plain trolling. Not dignifying it with a further response. As we neither not nor care about your ethnicity, your cry of racism is utter bullshit.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for plainly not being a good fit for a collaborative project.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 20:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me.

Dear Wikipedia users this block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not do it again, and in the future I will make productive contributions instead. Yours Faithfully, James Lawrie. James Lawrie (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

James Lawrie (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia users this block is no longer necessary because I understand what I have been blocked for, I will not do it again, and in the future I will make productive contributions instead. Yours Faithfully, James Lawrie. James Lawrie (talk) 21:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.