User talk:Cassiopeia

Kevin De Bruyne

Hi,

The deleted info is not correct (cf. link I added): https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=nl&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=nl&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.demorgen.be%2Ftvmedia%2F-sorry-voor-alles-bedenker-kamiel-de-bruyne-doet-zich-voor-als-broer-van-kevin-de-bruyne-b901e24c%2F&edit-text=

From the article: 'Sorry for everything'-creator Kamiel De Bruyne pretends to be the brother of Kevin De Bruyne...

Kamiel De Bruyne and Wannes Deleu, creators of the second season of the hidden camera program Sorry for everything , join forces again to take unknown people. For that, De Bruyne goes through life as a fictional brother of Kevin...

"Whenever we had to show our identity cards at check-in somewhere, Kamiel was asked if he was related to Manchester City player Kevin De Bruyne, a name written in exactly the same way."

For the sake of clarity: that is not Kamiel.

KR, 2A02:1810:CC21:5200:9088:4BAA:5681:BF60 (talk) 12:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

@2A02:1810:CC21:5200:9088:4BAA:5681:BF60: Greetings to you and thank you for the link and explanation. I have removed the unsourced content from the page and also the warning tag from you page. Thanks again for letting me know of the above. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

El Recreo Shopping Mall

Hello Cassiopeia,

I created both pages (Centro Comercial El Recreo and El Recreo Shopping Mall). I have added more citations and one quote. I would like you to review the page once again. I was the author of the article in Spanish Language. You have wrotten that "give proper attribution is needed". What else should I do?

PD: I also created the new article "Boulevard of Sabana Grande"

Thank you in advance QuinteroP (talk) 20:38, 10 May 2018 (UTC)QuinteroP

@QuinteroP: Good day. Thank you for the question above. Since you are the original creator/author for both El Recreo Shopping Mall (Wiki EN) and Centro_Comercial_El_Recreo (Wiki ES). No proper attribution is needed. You might want to state that in the "article talk page" (just add a new section) and mention that with link provided next time.

Both of the article in Wiki EN El Recreo Shopping Mall and Boulevard of Sabana Grande have been reviewed and tagged with WikiProject template in the artilces' talk pages.

My ES is limited and if you are confident with your English skills and deem the translation is good enough from ES to EN, then you are welcome to remove the tag and just state you command a good language skills fro both ES and EN in the edit summary before saving. Thank you very much for your contribution for both Wiki EN and ES as it is very much appreciated by the Wikipedia community. Do let me know if anything else I could help. Have a wonderful day and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:04, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Tech News: 2018-20

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• Dynamic maps are now available on most Wikipedias. Labels on maps can also be in different languages.
• The new Advanced Search interface is now available as a Beta Feature on all wikis. This makes it easier to learn about and to use many of the powerful options in our search. Feedback is appreciated. [1]

Changes later this week

• The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 15 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 16 May. It will be on all wikis from 17 May (calendar).

Meetings

• You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 16 May at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• In the mobile view, warnings for when something is wrong with a page are not as clear as they should be. The developers are working on this. You can give feedback and suggestions.
• The developers are working on making the Wikipedia Android app available in more languages. You can give feedback, suggestions and help test it. Read more on mediawiki.org [2]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

22:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your Moving to Drafts

Hello. I've noticed that you move almost every unsourced article you come across in NPP to draftspace. If you're unaware, the majority of articles you move to draftspace are never touched again. Yesterday, you moved 8 pages to draftspace in a span of 7 minutes, and some of those pages could have remained in mainspace (the sports ones). You also added refimprove tags to 13 footballers within a 7 minute period, and none of those articles are needing of a refimprove tag. They're single-sentence sports bios; a single reference is fine. Thanks, Vermont (talk) 10:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

@Vermont:, Unsourced article can be moved to draft space and Wikipedia notability is based on third party and significant coverage reliable source - Articles on sport was sourced with primary source. One source is lesser of notability. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:33, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Notability? Those sports players are inherently notable due to the league they're in, and the sources werw from statistics/sports websites. That sort of article does not need secondary sources when the only content is the player's team and statistics. Vermont (talk) 10:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

@Vermont:, I know they are notable, if not PROD would be tagged by editors, but the corner stone of Wikipedia guidelines require independent, reliable source with significant coverage for verification as it defines by Wikipedia notability guidelines - WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Sport statistics are primary sources, some are very reliable and other are not so, as the info is/might provided/provide by the local/event companies (depends on which sport and which sport statistic source and I am not saying these particular sport statistics you mentioned is not reliable). For a fully notable article, significant coverage is required, for such a bioplate tag for additional source is not uncommon to invite other editors/the creators to add more source and add content to strengthen the notability and develop the article further. As you may know, every WikiProject sports have their own sport specific guidelines, some regulate tighter (that they consider sport statistics source as random coverage) and other would consider permissible. Just as each sister Wikipedia project has it own requirements when it comes to notability guidelines. In addition, GNG and SPG do not work in slimness way and it depends which guidelines one based their ground on to address the case, as you would notice if you are active in AfD. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

You added maintenance tags to those 13 athlete articles. Those are not to “invite” people to add sources. We don’t add maintenance tags to invite people to edit. Everyone is encouraged to add sources to every article. Overtagging is an issue; those articles were unneeding of the tags you added. I also don’t really understand what you mean by “fully notable”. Something is either notable, or it isn’t; could you explain? Thanks, Vermont (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

I’ve read this over and realize I phrased it a bit wrong; maintenance tags are sort of to invite people to edit. But, we shouldn’t be putting them on every article we think they might apply on. I ask that you be a bit more conservative in your addition of tags. Thanks, and happy editing :) Vermont (talk) 15:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

@Vermont: I have mentioned above but maybe I was not clear enough, we as the NPP reviewers would understand the different between independent reliably source vs primary source and significant coverage (source) vs single source coverage. If you look at the sportmen/women basic notability criteria, it defines as "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject", which means trivial coverage, Primary sources and routine game coverage ( Listings of statistics) need to be support further with multiple independent reliable source to establish full notability.

I have only insert ONE (more source needed / only primary source) tag on article which has only one primary source and my understanding is this is not overtagging or incorrect tagging. Moreover, tags are visible in page but also in hidden categories sections, which would invite those interest editors to further improve the page if they view the page or search the hidden category section pages. However, I might miss some or interpret some guidelines which if you do know, please advise and provide the link for my perusal and I thank you in advance. I understand what happened to you on overtagging in the past and appreciate your note and good faith of advising of the above. Have a good day. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 00:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

A dog for you!

	A dog for you!
	Your user page's words is so humour. Linear D (talk) 02:46, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Gerrards Cross Memorial Building

Hello, CASSIOPEIA. how can you say my up date was not constructive for Gerrards Cross Memorial Building it was it has a new use as a gym and not used bye the royal british legion any moro i was not experimenting with the page i was puting in the right info so put it back or i will — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.57.28 (talk) 21:46, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

@84.13.57.28:, G'day mate, Thank you for the above message and since you have only edited three times in Wikipedia, I am not sure you are familiar with the linking system in Wikipedia. Please click on the "blue and purplish color texts/phrase" below for they will bring you to other pages in Wikipedia where you could find more details info of the "said message/text".

On February 19, 2018, you removed "sourced" content and added info without the support of source/reference, for such I reverted your edit as it is considered not constructive according to Wikipedia guidelines. Please note that content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent "third party" reliable source (in any language) for verification. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, facebook, twitter, instagram are primary source and not independent source and they NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources obtain from newspaper or sources obtain from publisher. Do note that Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR.

You added back the text (serves as a new gym in the town called inspire fitness centre run bye some local owners from the town www.inspire2train.co.uk) yesterday May 18, 2018 and it was reverted again by user Classicwiki. Since this time your provided a web link, and upon checking, it is a home page of Inspire2train fitness gym and I noticed the address in the web page indeed shows the same as per the existing source Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire, SL9 7AD. Do you able to find other source, besides the Inspire2train official home page, which indicates the gym's address/location, and if so, you could forward me the URL and I will help you to insert the inline citation as you cant just copy and page the URL into the article. I believe I have answered your questions and do let me know if I could help further. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Flag map of the world

Hello, I nominated the file for deletion on Commons. That's why I deleted this on Wikipedia.