User talk:199.7.157.26

Recent edit to Evie Christie

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Evie Christie), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 14:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Evie Christie

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Evie Christie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jacona (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Evie Christie because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 15:23, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Evie Christie. Super48paul (talk) 16:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You clearly have a problem with this Evie, I am sure. But Wikipedia readers will on average not be interested to hear all this. Try to find other means to get your complaints be heard! Good luck with that.Super48paul (talk) 16:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

199.7.157.26 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is a shared IP range used by Starbucks. Blocking it causes collateral damage. It was blocked in April. Blocking for 3 months is excessive

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is a shared IP range used by Starbucks. Blocking it causes collateral damage. It was blocked in April. Blocking for 3 months is excessive |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is a shared IP range used by Starbucks. Blocking it causes collateral damage. It was blocked in April. Blocking for 3 months is excessive |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is a shared IP range used by Starbucks. Blocking it causes collateral damage. It was blocked in April. Blocking for 3 months is excessive |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}