User talk:Legacypac

Request for Review

Dear Legacypac, could you please review my [1]. The Billboard Chart link and source should meet the Wiki guidelines of one song performance. Thank you for your time and assistance with this submission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dallasman04 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Request for review

Dear Legacypac, please if you could review my Draft:Susy Rottonara. The international awarded productions are supported by reliable sources. I have cancelled the references to the user's generated sources and I have substituded the reference to the publication on her own website with the link to the festival. I hope now it is ok. Thank you for your time and for your help. Best regards.Johannade57 (talk) 07:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

M

28 April 2018 submission review of the page Ben-Soussan T.D.

Hello Legacypac, thank you for your message. It is the first I try to create a new page on the English Wikipedia and your suggestions and tips are very helpful. Thank you very much, sicerely Pasciutoale (talk) , 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Heera Sohal

It wasn't create-protected. The editor had already created a draft in draft space, so that if you tried to move the sandbox into draft space, it was blocked because there was already a page there. The two drafts are essentially the same, except that one version had its text hidden by mistake. I have declined one copy, and converted the other to a redirect to the declined draft. It wasn't create-protected, just a case of creating multiple copies of drafts. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok great. Legacypac (talk) 03:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

If you try to move a sandbox page into draft space and are blocked, it is much more common that it is just multiple copies of drafts than any sort of protection. Try to view the draft. In this case, the draft was malformed and appeared to be blank.

And Robert McClenon, this kind of thing is becoming a problem. I've recently come across a user (who ostensibly can't read English) who dumps poor, unsourced machine translations back in to main space which I had already moved to draft. In this instance, I deleted the draft and moved the mainspace version mainspace article back to draft. That is one way of legitimately deleting the mainspace piece, and the draft has not, in theory been deleted, because it has been replaced with the same original one. The only problem is that this action requires an admin. Thoughts? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:46, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Kudpung - My thinking is that a page should only be draftified once. I have seen, and I strongly disapprove of, move-warring in which a submitter moves from draft to article, and other editors move from article to draft. That is the wrong answer. In that case, User:Legacypac and I agree that AFD is right. Draftifying should only be done as a courtesy to the author, and tendentious authors are not entitled to the courtesy and should get AFD or WP:CSD. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:58, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

You're missing the point here: 'user (who ostensibly can't read English) who dumps poor, unsourced machine translations back in to main space'. So you want to do the author the courtesy of letting an inappropriate stay in mainspace while it gets debated for another 7 days? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:38, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks Legacypac, for your help with the Arbonne Int'l page! I appreciate it! SunnyBoi (talk) 06:37, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your kind assistance on my Draft:Tango Argentino (musical) --Mfrerich (talk) 20:08, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Super-short pages

After some prompting on IRC I added Category:Pending AfC submissions less than 450 bytes long to the pending submissions template to flag any templates <450 bytes, which should make for easy finding of sub-stubs that likely aren't properly referenced. Thought you might want to know (I know SQL has the dbase search, but this will update in real-time. Primefac (talk) 01:48, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Sounds useful thanks.Legacypac (talk) 02:09, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:Neolithic carved stone balls
• Draft:South Tel Aviv Liberation Front

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:Tatiana Huezo Sanchez

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Training schools in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English First (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:Imelda Akmal
• Draft:Marisa Papen

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Request for assistance on WP:OR issue on my article

• Q-elements (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:William George Mensah Brandful (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Legacypac!

Thank you for reviewing my article, I am extremely grateful for the feedback as I know I would learn a lot by the end of the day. I am still getting used to the wikipedia environment and the rules.

Please I have noted the concerns and I wish to get help to address it so my article will be accepted for it to go live. Kindly assist me to correct the the WP:OR issues raised.

Kindly help.

Thank you

Q-elements (talk) 08:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

• Draft:Taiyabur Rahman Chowdhury
• Draft:Terry Lim

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

RE: Request on 05:34:58, 30 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Teagleman

Hi Legacypac!

Thanks for your response. You mentioned you're having another reviewer look at this draft page for approval. Please advise if I should resubmit the page for the aforementioned further review or just hold tight till I hear back from the other reviewer? Again, thanks for your help! Tiffany

Teagleman (talk) 05:41, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

You must resubmit when you are ready Legacypac (talk) 08:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Tag categories

Hi Legacypac. Could you offer me advice in an area where I am blank? How do we handle tag categories such as those created by this editor and added to Model Livestock Advancement Foundation? Vacate and CSD or CFD? Thanks, Sam Sailor 07:48, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand the question. The categories look good on that page. Legacypac (talk) 08:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 12:23:58, 31 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Wiki-Contributor BD

• Wiki-Contributor BD (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dr. Salma Sultana (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wiki-Contributor BD (talk) 12:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Yale student abortion art controversy

Regarding this, do I simply move the Yale student abortion art controversy article to what is currently a draft? Bus stop (talk) 14:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

No click Aliza Shvarts than click back to Aliza Shvarts at the top. Copy your article in from the draft. The work is attributed to you. You can put # (no space) REDIRECT Aliza Shvarts on the Draft and save it User:Bus stop Legacypac (talk) 14:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

I can't move it to Aliza Shvarts because that is already a redirect. I've already replaced the content. Bus stop (talk) 14:33, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

I just blanked the redirect for you. Just put your article on Aliza Shvarts Legacypac (talk) 14:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

He shouldn't do this AT ALL! He proposed this on talk, and (despite, or perhaps because of, many long repetitive posts) very clearly failed to pursuade most of the many editors who commented, so there is no consensus for this at all - he declined to follow my suggestion he should start a formal WP:RM. Johnbod (talk) 14:39, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

OK, I won't do that. Bus stop (talk) 14:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

I don't know anything about that. The normal thing to do is edit over a redirect with a trivial history. Legacypac (talk) 14:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Johnbod may be right and I've taken his advice and started a move request on the article talk page. Thanks to all. Bus stop (talk) 15:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

(ec) Understood - in fact the "Yale" article was apparently created as a bio in 2008, then deleted at AFD and somehow re-created as Yale student abortion art controversy (not sure of the precise hiostory here, but presumably this was agreed), which people seemed happy with until just recently). Since we have a draft bio of decent quality created, despite a number of editors having objected to that at "Yale" talk, possibly the best way forward is to set that up as an article and start an AfD to test the current feeling. Johnbod (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

WP:AfC does not need to wade into this at all. My opinion is the Yale article is very poorly named. Legacypac (talk) 15:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapour-phase-mediated_antimicrobial_activity

I read you "Copyvio checked ok with earwig tool" this page, but should this page not be removed or moved to another page? The reasons I have are: 1) it seems to be a a (spam) article/wikipedia page written by one of the authors of the papers mentioned 2) it uses pretty much the same 2 articles from the same first author (Feyaerts) 3) the last reference "Plant-derived volatiles may serve as future antifungals". Phys.org. March 9, 2018. Retrieved 2018-03-10." is nothing more but the same reference from Feyaerts et al (check the link, you can see it is written by the same authors again) 4) there are 2 references from other authors Novy P, Kloucek P, Rondevaldova J, Havlik J, Kourimska L, Kokoska L (April 2014). "Thymoquinone vapor significantly affects the results of Staphylococcus aureus sensitivity tests using the standard broth microdilution method". Fitoterapia. 94: 102–7. doi:10.1016/j.fitote.2014.01.024. PMID 24508861 and Bueno J (2015). "Models of evaluation of antimicrobial activity of essential oils in vapour phase: a promising use in healthcare decontamination". Natural Volatiles & Essential Oils. 2 (2). ISSN 2148-9637. However the first one Noby et al never mentioned the VMAA while it is used as a reference. And the second reference Bueno et al is a valid one, but it just talks about another approach (agar disk diffusion test) that is already mentioned on another wikipedia page. 5) this while page should be either moved or deleted because at the moment it is nothing but a term that is explained. The "term" itself (or process) in this page is supported by only 1 author (Feyaerts) that published 2 papers on it and the last reference on phys.org is again from the same author.

It seems that Feyaerts et al came up with this name (VMAA) and now want to put it out there, but should it be done like this? With a new article based on their papers? There are no secondary sources whatsoever. (Unsigned)

I've copied over to the page and answered there. Legacypac (talk) 14:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Review my page

Dear Legacypac, Hope you are doing great. Thanks you so much for your review on article Draft:Salma Sultana. I saw your comment, you wrote "She is not notable outside her organization and should not have a separate article at this point". However you may think like that but the real fact is she is the well known young changemaker in Bangladesh and a famous young entrepreneur. She is the first and only female veterinarian who is working for the community development through livestock sector in Bangladesh. She is fighting against the traditional custom. For her great contribution to the society she was awarded several times. So I think a separate article should be made on her. I have submitted this article with editing some portion and added some references. I hope you will review it again and leave a good comment. Thank you with regards Wiki-Contributor BD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki-Contributor BD (talk • contribs) 15:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

I gave my opinion. You are better served including info about here on the organization page for now. Legacypac (talk) 15:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Talk pages

It would probably be best if we adopted an informal interaction ban between us. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Why in the world would we need that? But hey if you want to bring your own conduct to ANi let me know. Legacypac (talk) 21:22, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Well, let's put it this way: I get nothing but negative vibes from you, and prefer not to interact with you anymore. And I assume the feeling is pretty much mutual. As for ANI, that is off my radar, and I intend to keep it that way. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

We have little interaction and I don't having any bad feelings toward you. I just find some of your behavior problematic. Legacypac (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 22:42:16, 31 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Nikhil1115

• Nikhil1115 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Zeus (company) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey, I have just received a rejection message on my Wikipedia article. I believe, every information that I added came from a reliable source. The newspaper-like independent or Irishtimes had fully covered every story.

Also, there is nothing promotional and fake. It is fully based on substantial information that I have found online. If you specifically want me to improve the referencing, please advise on what you think is not reliable/verifiable.

Nikhil1115 (talk) 22:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

See my comments on the DRAFT Legacypac (talk) 22:43, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Request on 23:14:35, 31 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Nikhil1115

• Nikhil1115 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Zeus (company) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Legacypac,

Thanks very much for the recent review. I have seen your message on company's talks page. I will delete redundant references. Will add a bit about the statement '3rd party' independent websites made for the company with references.

Let me have some time to edit the content. There are few redundant links that can be removed and others which are mentioned may be employed better with some statements that I can use on Wikipedia article.

If reliable and verifiable, will that possibly solve the issue?

Thanks,

Nikhil Nikhil1115 (talk) 23:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Hey Legacypac,

I edited the draft. Put in extra bits garnered from different sources. I used company links to show their shipping policies and the way they takes their order. Apart from this — removes redundant links and references as well.

If you may kindly have a look at it for the review? I’d highly thankful to you. Nikhil1115 (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Sorry there are few typos here. I am travelling :) Nikhil1115 (talk) 18:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

I can change that to ‘Private’. And as far as links are concerned, they are different links for their country specific websites. I can remove all and can allow one main website on the infobox. Nikhil1115 (talk) 18:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Joshua Boyle

Draft is here. JoshuaBoyleIsAwesome (talk) 23:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) There is an existing article about Boyle at Kidnapping of Joshua Boyle and Caitlan Coleman. Nevermind, I see from your contribs you know that, never mind me. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks again for accepting my article on Dann-Jacques Mouton Barry Ne (talk) 03:50, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Request on 06:38:16, 1 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Jules Kos

• Jules Kos (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Flight Design CTLS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I have just seen the drafts I made have been declined due to :Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Flight Design CT instead. The point is that the Flight Design CT page should not contain the descriptions of all the models produced by the manufacturer because it will create confusion and in general will be hard to read. Especially that there are 2 separate pages for this company models, such as Flight Design MC and Flight Design C4. SO it makes sense to have also Flight design CTLS, Flight Design CTSW and Flight Design CT Supralight cause it's not the same.

Thanks for looking into it. Jules Kos (talk) 06:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Jules Kos the reality is these titles exist as are redirects and the models are covered on one page. If you want to split them up as an editorial decision you will need to overwrite the redirects to provide amd remove those modals from the family of models page. An AfC reviewer is not toing to do all that for you. If you need help try posting on the talk page of the existing page about the family of models for interested editors to assist. Legacypac (talk) 06:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

How to overwrite the redirects? I have asked support yesterday, and I was told that it's done by a reviewer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jules Kos (talk • contribs) 07:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

I don't know who you asked but spliting a page up is not something we do at AfC. Overwriting a redirect is simply putting actual article content on the page amd deleting the Redirect part. Legacypac (talk) 07:38, 1 June 2018 (UTC)