Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎User:L293D: fixed error
→‎User:Gpkp: not done
Line 27: Line 27:
::{{comment|Automated comment}} This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PermaLink/845969459#User:Gpkp]). <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">&mdash; <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 17:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
::{{comment|Automated comment}} This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PermaLink/845969459#User:Gpkp]). <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">&mdash; <b>[[User:MusikBot|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">MusikBot</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:MusikAnimal|<span style="color:green">talk</span>]]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 17:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
:::: '''Comment:''' Request rejected only because, I didn't mention the reason why I required this tool, which now I've. --[[User:Gpkp|Gpkp]] ([[User talk:Gpkp|talk]]) 05:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
:::: '''Comment:''' Request rejected only because, I didn't mention the reason why I required this tool, which now I've. --[[User:Gpkp|Gpkp]] ([[User talk:Gpkp|talk]]) 05:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::{{notdone}} For several reasons:
:::::#I just deleted [[File:Ranna-poet-pic.jpg]] which you uploaded claiming was your own work, but it was a book cover and definitely copyrighted.
:::::#You have a block on the edge of 6 months for copyright violations.
:::::#And you aren't reviewing new pages ([[Naggar Castle]]) for copyright violations.
:::::-- [[User talk:DeltaQuad|<span style="color:white;background-color:#8A2DB8"><b>Amanda</b></span>]] <small>[[User:DeltaQuad|(aka DQ)]]</small> 19:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)


====[[User:L293D]]====
====[[User:L293D]]====

Revision as of 19:35, 16 June 2018

New page reviewer

I feel I could patrol the New Pages Feed more effectively by using the WikiLove and Message to Creator buttons to help editors (especially new ones) not get discouraged, even if their pages don't meet Wikipedia's requirements yet. I would also like to be a New Page Reviewer so I can mark good pages as Reviewed (in keeping with Wikipedia's guidelines) and help reduce the new page review backlog. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 14:39, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have been on an extended Wikibreak, but before that I was involved with mostly 'behind the scenes' maintenance tasks, and am quite keen to pick up where I left off. I note now that I appear to need a flag to review new pages, and am also involved at Articles for Creation. Having refreshed my knowledge of the guidelines I'd be keen to contribute to new page reviewing as I used to before my break. Jamietw (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On the 30th of March, 2017 Nick removed my New Page Reviewer user rights on en.wikipedia. Rightly so, I have to say, because I was not experienced. In the meantime I have thoroughly read WP:V and WP:RS to learn what reliable sources are, WP:N to learn which subject is notable and which is not and when to apply WP:STICKY and especially when to apply the criteria listed under WP:CCS. I carefully read WP:STUB to learn what is a stub and what is not. So I would kindly ask you to give me another chance at helping the reviewing backlog.I have already asked the admin who removed the user right, please visit here to confirm: User_talk:Nick#Request_for_New_Page_Reviewer_Right. Celestinesucess (talk) 08:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am an experienced reviewer in WP:AfC and have been active on Wikipedia for 8 years, with over 6,000 edits in the article namespace. I would like to be able to use the Page Curation tool to patrol new pages more effectively. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 11:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have the experience, pursuing an edit count of nearly 6000+, and article-creation count of 88 and 200+ images, so meeting the eligibility criteria. Have contributed in reconstructing many existing articles, and rescued few articles from deletion. Have been encouraging new editors on article creation, editing and image uploading, without harassing any user for anything. Really interested now in excersising this new right of reviewing articles with a volunteer neutral-view. --Gpkp (talk) 16:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC) Gpkp (talk) 16:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 17:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Request rejected only because, I didn't mention the reason why I required this tool, which now I've. --Gpkp (talk) 05:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done For several reasons:
  1. I just deleted File:Ranna-poet-pic.jpg which you uploaded claiming was your own work, but it was a book cover and definitely copyrighted.
  2. You have a block on the edge of 6 months for copyright violations.
  3. And you aren't reviewing new pages (Naggar Castle) for copyright violations.
-- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:35, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have created 12 articles, I have 1 DYK and 1 GA, 13,000 edits, been here for seven months so I believe I am qualified for NPP. Last time I came here, my request was declined by Alex Shih and Amorymeltzer because of an now 2 month old AWB screw-up where I got too hot and an error in accepting drafts (where I kept cool). I would like to take part in the NPP backlog drive that will start the 20th. Thanks. L293D ( • ) 16:33, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 16:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
L293D, no prejudice on the request, but I don't believe you have addressed why you were requesting G6 for article credit; that was the reason why the "error in accepting drafts" appeared to be very strange. At the time of your previous declined request, both of the incidents that you have mentioned here were less than month old, so your statement here is slightly misleading. Alex Shih (talk) 16:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Alex Shih: The G6 thing was because I wanted to do a DYK of it and I thought the page had to be created in the past week, but now I learned that there is a "created from redirect" option that works also. And I reworded my request to clarify that that AWB incident in now two months old. L293D ( • ) 17:37, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]