Talk:Brantford

anyone hear of the BCI protest today?? students were protesting the rebuilding of the school on a new site, they wanted to keep the school on the current site.

You might want to include talk about our famous athletes besides Wayne Gretsky, (David Hearn, Kevin Sulliven etc)

There is no one greater than The Great One!!! But you're probably right that Kevin Sulliven and David Hearn should be mentioned. Unfortunately I don't know enough about either of them to put together more than a stub article. --NormanEinstein 17:43, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

I am reverting this comment deletion as it is both pertinent and accurate. Dajhorn 04:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

The presence of Wilfrid Laurier University in Brantford is token, and happened only because the city paid the school to come. Calling the WLU facilities a "campus" is embellishing, as the buildings are spread across freebie properties the commercially dead Brantford downtown core. (eg: The old Holstein Building, the abandonded Cineplex theatre, the old library, the Eaton Centre, etc.) The WLU Brantford facility does not have a proper library, it does not offer gradudate studies, and it is mostly disconnected from the main Waterloo campus.

Brantford, like many other communities in Southern Ontario, seems to be trying too hard to rehabilitate a dead downtown core. Dajhorn 04:59, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it makes it a great place to shoot Silent hill (film).

We should list all of the films that were shot in Brantford

The WLU Brantford campus is growing...Last I heard their enrollment was something like 1400. That doesn't seem token to me.

There could have been 1,400 students in some of my frosh major courses.

I did a significant part of my undergrad at WLU, and the facilities in Brantford are just a shadow of the main campus, which again is tiny compared to a comprehensive university like UW.

Consider how WLU is piggybacking on the third floor of the city library. The Brantford campus will be 'token' until WLU begins spending their own money to build real facilities. It is, however, sensible for WLU to continue accepting gifts from the city. Dajhorn 13:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Pauline Johnson

I've requested a peer review for this article. If you're interested in giving some feedback, click here. Thanks, Bobanny 00:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was to move, apparently.
This is to propose that this article be renamed to Brantford. This is clearly primary usage within Canada. When searching the U.S. Gazetteer [1] for "Brantford", only 2 entries for "Brantford Township" are returned (one in KS, the other in SD, neither has a 1990 population of more than 158). UK Ordnance survey doesn't seem to have a Brantford [2] and neither does any Brantford appear on the UK Coal Authority's gazetteer.[3] Google on "brantford -ontario" seems to return only Brantford, Ontario related items anyway. Seems Brantford is overwhelmingly WP:PRIMARYUSAGE and simplification should not pose any ambiguation problem. Dl2000 (talk) 02:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

A Google search of plain "Brantford" returns results overwhelmingly related to the Ontario city. Clearly the primary usage of the name, and the move is consistent with the applicable naming convention at WP:CANSTYLE. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

The page was moved by another editor shortly after this discussion was initiated. Although the normal practice is to allow a discussion to play out, except perhaps in cases of WP:SNOW, nobody has come out of the woodwork since the move to object either to the proposal or the pre-emptive move. So, I guess we can assume that the move was uncontested and uncontroversial. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Demographics section

I haven't been adding the demographics section over the last week or so, but is there any reason why it can't stay? I see it's been reverted several times.... Ahsile (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't see any reason why it can't stay. The problem with the previous edits was that the editor was spamming his website across many articles. I'll add the section back and link to the original Statscan source data. --NormanEinstein (talk) 14:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good. Statscan info is a more reliable source than a third party site. Ahsile (talk) 13:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

King George VI Secondary School

Hello Brantfordians - I found the article for King George VI Secondary School today, which is in rough shape. The problem is that I cannot find any information about the school; no address, no website, nothing. Does the school exist? Can some of you please update the article? Thanks, PKT(alk) 17:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles needs to be properly cited

A lot of information, including entire sections, is not given a source. I've added some sources and will continue to do, but the entire article needs work, especially the lead, the history section, and the economy section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon1930 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Brantford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140502001952/http://www.cmhmhq.ca/ to http://www.cmhmhq.ca
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150119010300/http://freedomhouse.ca/2014/03/29/frosty-fest/ to http://freedomhouse.ca/2014/03/29/frosty-fest/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060514210815/http://www.bmha.on.ca:80/waynegretzkytournament.htm to http://www.bmha.on.ca/waynegretzkytournament.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110911041219/http://www.brantford.com/readStory.cfm?articleId=372 to http://www.brantford.com/readStory.cfm?articleId=372
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628042408/http://brantsportshall.com:80/ to http://brantsportshall.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Corrected the link to the The Canadian Military Museum to http://canadianmilitaryheritagemuseum.ca/

Corrected the link for Frosty Fest to a 2015 news item: http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca/2015/02/08/frosty-fest-celebrates-winter

Corrected the link for the Wayne Gretzky Int'l Tournament to http://brantfordminorhockey.com/Tournaments/3256/Wayne_Gretzky_International_Hockey_Tournament/

Corrected the link to the Sports Hall of Recognition to http://www.waynegretzkysportscentre.ca/AboutUs/SportsHallofRecognition.aspx

PKT(alk) 14:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Citations template

I think the article has sufficient citations now. If no one objects, I'm going to remove the template message. MaxwellArcher (talk) 02:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Go for it. BTW, new messages should be added to the bottom of talk pages. PKT(alk) 12:05, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Is Brantford in Brant County?

The infobox is saying that Brantford's county is Brant and that it is independent from Brant. I don't see how Brantford may, for geographic purposes, be within Brant County. They are both single-tier municipalities and therefore, for municipal purposes, they are geographically separate.

O. Reg. 180/03 prescribes that single-tier municipalities within the same geographic area (defined in Schedules 1 and 2 of the regulation) as an upper-tier municipality are, for geographic purposes, situated within the respective upper-tier municipality.

Historically, some local municipalities as well as the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and the Provisional County of Haliburton were, for judicial purposes, geographically situated within a county (or, for the case of Haliburton County, another county) but were geographically separate from the respective county for municipal purposes. Territorial Division Act, RSO 1980, c 497 Haliburton Act, RSO 1970, c 198

If Ontario municipalities are considered census divisions and subdivisions, I think Brant County should be considered a census subdivision and not a census division.

The County of Brant and the City of Brantford are single-tier municipalities within a single census division with the generic type "Census division". Similarly, the single-tier municipalities of Haldimand County and Norfolk County are within the single census division Haldimand-Norfolk with the generic type "Census division".

A census subdivision exists with the name "Brant" and type "City". Prior to Municipal Act, 2001 coming into force, the single-tier municipality of Brant may have had the former official status of a city. The census subdivision type may be "City" due to the former status of the municipality. Alternatively, the census subdivision type may be "City" because the type "County" is nonexistent.

--2607:FEA8:7A1F:F41F:5D18:AB8C:E3F2:58E7 (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)