Jump to content

Talk:Black British people: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Add that fact: http://web.archive.org/web/20181023134143/https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/07/first-modern-britons-dark-black-skin-cheddar-man-dna-analysis-reveals<ref></ref>
Line 62: Line 62:


Since when has Africans born in Britain considered themselves "Black British" or ever used that term to describe themselves? [[Special:Contributions/81.141.15.52|81.141.15.52]] ([[User talk:81.141.15.52|talk]]) 19:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Since when has Africans born in Britain considered themselves "Black British" or ever used that term to describe themselves? [[Special:Contributions/81.141.15.52|81.141.15.52]] ([[User talk:81.141.15.52|talk]]) 19:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

for as long as their skins been black


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==

Revision as of 09:18, 15 December 2018

contextulisation

the African and Asian guests at a pub dinner given by the African and Asian Society found themselves seperated from other guests by a screen placed in the room[1]


so, cordless lary proposed i put this here for a discussion of where to contextualised this information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Menacinghat (talk • contribs) 23:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Ayahs, Lascars and Princes: The Story of Indians in Britain 1700-1947".
Just inserting that example into the article isn't helpful, in my view. It needs more context. Do we have sources that establish that this was typical of the time, for example? Why are we picking this example rather than others? Cordless Larry (talk) 13:07, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
nb edit conflict
I'm not sure what point is being made, implicitly that there was prejudice against/distaste of these people, of which this is an example. It isn't even clear who was segregated, the society members from the general clients of the pub that night or the white and non-white society members from each other. If the point is that there was prejudice, I would have thought a better, more general statement would be clearer covering something broader than this incident. Pincrete (talk) 13:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Film reel

Agreed. I feel the same about this. Why are we singling out this one film reel to open a section with? Cordless Larry (talk) 17:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the material about the film reel. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:02, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just a thought, but if the film is in the public domain, would a captioned 'still' work as an image? as suggested here "would this be better as an image if poss?". Pincrete (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, that might make more sense - using it to illustrate the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revision by 105.112.16.252

What are these sources? @105.112.16.252  ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by I Am Chaos (talk • contribs) 14:17, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Black British. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black British. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Africans born in Britain do not consider themselves "Black British"

Since when has Africans born in Britain considered themselves "Black British" or ever used that term to describe themselves? 81.141.15.52 (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

for as long as their skins been black

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Black British. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

photos

some captions have full stops others do not — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.153.5.155 (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Add that fact

http://web.archive.org/web/20181023134143/https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/feb/07/first-modern-britons-dark-black-skin-cheddar-man-dna-analysis-reveals

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Black_British_people&oldid=873820287"