Talk:The Telegraph: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Latest revision as of 18:40, 30 December 2018

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Journalism

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles

Media

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

The_Telegraph_(disambiguation) [edit]

Possibly, this could be clearer,....

... Regarding the links, as well as about Keith_Rupert_Murdoch, et-al.

Further, I found footy; but, can you explain bucks show?

Thank You,

[[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. ~~ Thank You. -]] 16:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 [[ user : hopiakuta |&#91;&#91; hopiakuta ]] Please do [[ sign ]] your [[ signature ]] on your [[ message]]. [[ %7e%7e ]] [[ %7e%7e | Thank You. ]]-]] 16:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
-== Out of date listing of Telegraph website employees ==
-This is a continuation of the following discussion [[User talk:David J Johnson#The Telegraph| at David J Johnson's talk page]]. Here is the template massage David placed on my IP page: "Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Daily Telegraph, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''Do not remove properly sourced content just because of your own view''".
-This message was inappropriate, since I did provide an adequate edit summary. To enlarge on the points being made in that summary; a list of non-notable employees from 2014 - a snapshot - is of little or no use in an encyclopedia. It would also need continuous maintenance, since it will inevitably become out of date. Indeed, the first named employee, Kate Day, has already left the organisation. David also said ''Do not remove properly sourced content just because of your own view''". Firstly, of the three sources used in the disputed section, two purportedly pointed to a personal blog, and in fact now only point to a general Telegraph page. The other source is out of date, since it references Kate Day's position. In short, the content ''is not'' properly sourced. However, even if it was properly sourced, that does not exclude it from being removed if it is not relevant, or not needed, or for a host of other reasons. As noted, this type of content is of little or no use, so properly sourced or not, it can safely be removed without adversely affecting the article. Actually, I would consider this an improvement. For the reasons noted here, I'm removing the content again. I suggest this removal resets [[WP:BRD]], so please revert again according to the terms of BRD, if you think it's necessary - and add to the discussion here if you do so. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/31.52.160.160|31.52.160.160]] ([[User talk:31.52.160.160|talk]]) 18:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)