User talk:Flix11

• Flix11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - pie - global contribs

Mayor of Alfei Menashe

Hi Flix11,

I noticed that you recently reverted this edit. The anonymous editor is correct, there is a new mayor (head of council). This makes complete sense, given the 2018 Israeli municipal elections. Just giving you a heads up since another anon (maybe the same one?) made the edit again. If you are unsure about such edits on the topic of Israel, please feel free to ask at WT:ISRAEL.

—Ynhockey ^(Talk) 10:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. If the page is protected after you request, please DO NOT remove it. Instead, an admin will mark it as done and bot will archive it Hhkohh (talk) 12:48, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Noted. Thanks for giving feedback. – Flix11 (talk) 12:49, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Linking countries

Hi there. Quick heads-up: I believe links to countries like here is considered WP:Overlinking. There does not seem to be a "contextually important reason to link" the countries where to international goals were scored. Regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 20:51, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Estonia national football team results‎

I checked the video, the one who scored Qatars second goal was player no. 3 Abdelkarim Hassan. Soccerway has messed things up! Klõps (talk) 20:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Please update after penalties

Due to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 117#Live updates with penalty shoot-outs, please update all stats after penalties, not just AET. Enjoy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 13:51, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for helping fix up the current edit war going on. 7_qz (ゆっくりしていってね!) 14:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

@7 qz: No problem. Both shall be blocked for a while. BTW, why didn't they be reported to WP:ANEW instead? – Flix11 (talk) 14:48, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) One was reported to WP:UAA and I gave edit warring warning on their talk page Hhkohh (talk) 14:50, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Block is not for punishment, but for preventing Hhkohh (talk) 14:52, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joko Widodo 2019 presidential campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maluku (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

“Far-right supporter”

Comment not appreciated. What I'm doing is countering a personal bias for Jokowi and trying to deliver WP:N. Please refrain from doing these things in the future. Juxlos (talk) 12:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

@Juxlos: Okay then. I am sorry. – Flix11 (talk) 14:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iswahyudi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Manchester United

In the future, please be more careful with your edits. You added two games each to Pogba and Young's totals, failed to update the starts number for Phil Jones, and altered the initial access dates of the citations, violating WP:cite. I've chosen to revert all edits made today (including my own) to update the statistics from scratch in order to ensure they're done correctly. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

I am no longer asking. Any further edits to the timeline of Wikipedia's original access to citations or incorrect statistics will be construed as vandalism; the PSG match has already been included. You are the one adding two matches to players' statistics. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 01:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

@MAINEiac4434: If it is, then why Rashford and Martial each had 1 sub cap less, while they started the PSG match? Why did Young had 1 starting cap less in your edit (172) than even in the PSG-less source (173)? Before you ask, see on "Opponents Details". There is no "Paris Saint-Germain" there. Please check first before arguing. – Flix11 (talk) 01:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

@Flix11: Yes, I've been known to make a mistake or two, and it's good to double check. What isn't good, however, is altering the record for when citations are first put on a page. That is my primary issue with your edits. I'm also hesitant to add matches before official websites have been updated; it could be considered original research. Though you and I both know that Mata and Pogba and De Gea all played in the PSG match, the statistics websites have not yet been updated to include that, leading to a discrepancy between the page and the cited source. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 01:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

What are you doing?

If an admin doesn't leave a tag when blocking someone, there's a near certain chance that it wasn't an accident. And messages like these are not helpful. Natureium (talk) 03:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Alright. Just want to inform the user. Won't do it again. – Flix11 (talk) 03:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

If you want to leave warnings for vandalism, there are standard twinkle messages that are less angry sounding. Natureium (talk) 03:20, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

The standard one says: "may be blocked", so there is a chance the vandal will not be blocked. I changed and uppercased to emphasize that the vandal had no more chance after vandalizing again. I might lowercase those uppercase. – Flix11 (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Again, start with a level 1 warning. Robby.is.on (talk) 21:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Really?

You just blindly accused me of "vandalizing" a page about the UK political parties, that I just only moving the Scottish Nationalist Party up based on current facts? But you instead threaten to remove my edit rights, despite I literally moving the one political party one from the other, by looking at my contribution's page??? 2600:1700:8D0:12F0:49BD:1327:C176:8984 (talk) 03:36, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Say it to the one reported you here – Flix11 (talk) 03:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Alright since a bot reported you then what? I will erase my comment. – Flix11 (talk) 03:53, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Ok, that's fine then. And you can also fix my IP address filing here. 2600:1700:8D0:12F0:49BD:1327:C176:8984 (talk) 03:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User_talk:2A00:23C5:7C9D:6200:905A:BC54:992:DAA5 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not give an IP a level 4 warning for a single inappropriate edit. If that edit was incorrect all it warranted was a level 1 warning. Meters (talk) 21:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:24.191.211.210. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. What are you doing? An IP adds a line feed (for their first edit in more than 3 months) and you jump to a level 4 vandalism warning? Meters (talk) 21:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

You have been warned about this before, and you continue to do it. Not only are you giving inappropriate level 4 warnings to IPs with no previous history, but you are using a customized warning to make it sound even more dire. I see multiple instances of this today alone. Stop doing this. No IP should get a level 4 warning for minor vandalism, particularly when it is their first edit, or their first edit in months, or for an edit that happened months ago. It's even worse when you do it for an edit that is not even vandalism. If I see any more of these inappropriate warnings you will be the one getting the level 4 warning. Meters (talk) 21:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Kassym-Jomart Tokayev

Hi. He have left his office of Senate president and in official website, he is called President, not acting president or senate president acting as president. He will end the previous presidential term like US VP. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

@Panam2014: Please give reliable source(s) to support this. – Flix11 (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

See official website. And you could wait to see the first presidential decret. --Panam2014 (talk) 14:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Shamsunnahar Jr.

Hello, Flix11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shamsunnahar Jr.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Re: 2015-16 third kit

In fact, if you look at this page (under both the Change and Third tabs), you'll see that the black shirt was worn seven times during the season; three times with white socks and four times with black socks. But considering that website only records the frequency with which each combination was worn, neither of us should really be citing it when another more official source is available. – PeeJay 10:21, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Scott McTominay

Thank you, next time I will wait!