User talk:EnjoyableWiki1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Free Republic of Verdis (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Redalert2fan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Free Republic of Verdis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Free Republic of Verdis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Redalert2fan (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, EnjoyableWiki1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Redalert2fan (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Free Republic of Verdis

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Free Republic of Verdis, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Draft talk:Free Republic of Verdis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Draft talk:Free Republic of Verdis was changed by EnjoyableWiki1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.877004 on 2019-06-12T09:46:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:46, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Request

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

EnjoyableWiki1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I should be unblocked as I am aware that I have made multiple accounts over time especially since I'd been forgetting my passwords etc. I want to be unblocked so I can properly contribute to wikipedia. I was also blocked because they called 'Free Republic of Verdis' a hoax with the articles also being a hoax, although it is proven that the articles are not hoaxes, especially with an article being made by RTL. I also wish for Free Republic of Verdis to be unprotected so I can actually work on it and I ask that it is not protected again. If you don't want me to make it, at least unprotect it so someone else can. Thank you.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I believe I should be unblocked as I am aware that I have made multiple accounts over time especially since I'd been forgetting my passwords etc. I want to be unblocked so I can properly contribute to wikipedia. I was also blocked because they called 'Free Republic of Verdis' a hoax with the articles also being a hoax, although it is proven that the articles are not hoaxes, especially with an article being made by RTL. I also wish for Free Republic of Verdis to be unprotected so I can actually work on it and I ask that it is not protected again. If you don't want me to make it, at least unprotect it so someone else can. Thank you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe I should be unblocked as I am aware that I have made multiple accounts over time especially since I'd been forgetting my passwords etc. I want to be unblocked so I can properly contribute to wikipedia. I was also blocked because they called 'Free Republic of Verdis' a hoax with the articles also being a hoax, although it is proven that the articles are not hoaxes, especially with an article being made by RTL. I also wish for Free Republic of Verdis to be unprotected so I can actually work on it and I ask that it is not protected again. If you don't want me to make it, at least unprotect it so someone else can. Thank you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I believe I should be unblocked as I am aware that I have made multiple accounts over time especially since I'd been forgetting my passwords etc. I want to be unblocked so I can properly contribute to wikipedia. I was also blocked because they called 'Free Republic of Verdis' a hoax with the articles also being a hoax, although it is proven that the articles are not hoaxes, especially with an article being made by RTL. I also wish for Free Republic of Verdis to be unprotected so I can actually work on it and I ask that it is not protected again. If you don't want me to make it, at least unprotect it so someone else can. Thank you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}