Wikipedia:Proposal to expand WP:CSD/Proposal X (Correspondence)

Proposal X (Correspondence)

(Vote) (Discuss)

The following case should be added to Wikipedia:Candidates for speedy deletion:

Any article which consists only of attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title.

Votes

Agree

1. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 00:03, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
2. Neutrality^talk 00:11, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
3. Ground 00:12, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
4. Smoddy | Talk 00:16, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
5. Ld | talk 00:17, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
6. David Gerard 00:40, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
7. ugen64 00:46, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
8. Wikimol 00:49, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
9. MarkSweep 01:23, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
10. Vamp:Willow 01:37, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
11. Sketchee 01:46, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
12. Rje 02:15, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
13. Kevin 02:18, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
14. Carnildo 02:35, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
15. Antaeus Feldspar 02:48, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
16. Peter O. (Talk) 02:52, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
17. Ral315 03:21, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
18. Sc147 03:26, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
19. Antandrus 03:39, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
20. Ливай | ☺ 03:51, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
21. Adam Bishop 04:06, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
22. DJ Clayworth 05:23, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
23. Ben Brockert 05:58, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
24. Mindspillage (spill your mind?) 06:02, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
25. Korath (Talk) 06:18, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
26. Slowking Man 07:48, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
27. Golbez 07:48, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
28. iMeowbot~Mw 08:02, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
29. Sortior 08:26, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
30. Jeff Knaggs 09:02, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
31. Skysmith 09:15, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
32. RadicalSubversiv E 09:35, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
33. Dysprosia 11:35, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
34. David Johnson [T|C] 13:31, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
35. Dori | Talk 14:35, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
36. Tuf-Kat 14:42, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
37. Jayjg | (Talk) 17:18, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
38. Kelly Martin 18:05, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
39. Phils 18:42, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
40. Peacenik 20:54, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
41. RickK 21:34, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
42. Thue | talk 21:56, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
43. hfool/Wazzup? 23:45, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC). There aren't many of these anyway, are there?
44. Anthony Liekens 00:07, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
45. Conti|✉ 00:39, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
46. Joshuapaquin 02:55, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
47. DCEdwards1966 03:04, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
48. ℘yrop (talk) 03:22, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
49. Comics 03:36, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
50. gK ¿? 03:38, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
51. Seems to me this qualifies as an obvious test. [[User:Rdsmith4|User:Rdsmith4/sig]] 03:55, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
52. Ambi 05:23, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
53. —Charles P. ^(Mirv) 07:25, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
54. jni 10:21, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
55. Ryan! | Talk 11:05, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
56. Gentgeen 11:19, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
57. Xezbeth 11:37, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
58. Bucephalus 12:01, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
59. Cyrius|✎
60. Alphax (talk) 12:57, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
61. Tompagenet 13:22, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
62. This seems like a no-brainer. Gamaliel 13:36, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
63. It wasn't obvious to me what this meant, but examples on the talk page helped. older≠wiser 14:43, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
64. G Rutter 16:56, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
65. Proteus (Talk) 17:40, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
66. Jrdioko (Talk) 18:30, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
67. PedanticallySpeaking 19:15, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
68. I also think DJ Clayworth's suggested expansion (on the talk page) is good but that's not being voted on. Maybe in the future. -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 20:23, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
69. Keith D. Tyler [flame] 21:02, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
70. Paul August ☎ 21:04, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
71. Lucky 6.9 22:06, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
72. Shane King 01:42, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)

Disagree

1. JRM 01:02, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
2. ‣ᓛᖁ♀ᑐ 02:11, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
3. BSveen 00:43, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)