Jump to content

Talk:List of Chess boxing champions: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Reverted to revision 859349497 by Macdonald-ross (talk) (TW)
Line 22: Line 22:


If we had a category below "Articles of low importance" this article would be right for it. The subject is a miserable PR-gimmick of no inherent notability. [[User:Macdonald-ross|Macdonald-ross]] ([[User talk:Macdonald-ross|talk]]) 13:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
If we had a category below "Articles of low importance" this article would be right for it. The subject is a miserable PR-gimmick of no inherent notability. [[User:Macdonald-ross|Macdonald-ross]] ([[User talk:Macdonald-ross|talk]]) 13:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

== chess & boxing, brains vs brawn, new chess rotation, gm lubek, undefeated chess correspondance champion ==

en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=911480883 brainsvsbrawn.tripod.com/

[[File:NeoRandom.png|250px|thumbnail|right|One of the 3 possible rotations, including The 2K O00O rotation!!!]] <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Egg4me|Egg4me]] ([[User talk:Egg4me#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Egg4me|contribs]]) 20:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 20:50, 27 August 2019

WikiProject iconChess List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBoxing List‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Boxing "To Do":

Help pick the next article for collaboration.


Merge between it's sanctioning bodies as appropriate?

With Chessboxing still very new, this list may stand better if merged into its relevant organisation whether the WCBO or WCBA. One of the issues with this article at the moment is the lead section. If we merge this list with its other pages this won't be a problem anymore as it'll be within its context already.Jkmaskell (talk) 08:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Chess boxing champions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gimmick

If we had a category below "Articles of low importance" this article would be right for it. The subject is a miserable PR-gimmick of no inherent notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]