Talk:The Fool on the Hill

Untitled

An infobox was requested for the 1968 Sérgio Mendes version of "The Fool on the Hill" at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedic_articles/List_of_notable_songs/13.

References! Where are the references? Aaadddaaammm 04:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Other possibilities

Mention of other theories of the meaning of this song? About Hitler, for example? Aaadddaaammm 04:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC) I also agree there is other meaning, i belive that the song may reffer to buddy holly. buddy holly was often called a "hillbilly"- also, the chourus for me is what stands in the basic of what is art. all the beatles like holly, and so did paul, i think it might very well reffer to buddy holly. (P.S. the hitler theory is dumb.)

Back in the early 1970s, the song was widely believed in America to refer to Richard Nixon, although he was not in public office at the time it was written.Anti-war wishful thinking, in all likelihood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.242.42 (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Moved from article

The following story: 1. seems weird; 2. wasn't mentioned by Lennon or McCartney as quoted here; 3. has been copied literally from another website (Songfacts). More references should be found for it. --194.145.161.227 23:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The song is about a man who is considered a fool by others, but whose foolish demeanor is actually an indication of wisdom.

The event which prompted this song happened when Paul McCartney was walking his dog, Martha, on Primrose Hill one morning. As he watched the sun rise, he noticed that Martha was missing. McCartney turned around to look for his dog, and saw a man standing near him, who had suddenly appeared on the hill. The gentleman was dressed respectably, in a belted raincoat.

McCartney knew that this man had not been there seconds earlier as he had looked in that direction for Martha. He and the stranger exchanged a greeting, and this man then spoke of what a beautiful view it was from the top of the hill (that overlooked London). After a few seconds, McCartney looked around again, and the man was gone. He had vanished as he had appeared. A friend of McCartney's, Alistair Taylor, who was present with McCartney during this strange incident, later wrote of this event in his book, Yesterday.

Both McCartney and Taylor could not imagine what happened to this man. He had seemed to vanish in thin air. The nearest trees for cover were too far to reach by walking or running in a few seconds, and the crest of the hill was too far to reach in that short time. What made the experience even more mysterious was that just before this man first appeared, McCartney and Taylor were speaking to each other of the beauty of the view towards London and the existence of God.

Back home, they spent the morning discussing what had happened, trying to make some sense of it. They both agreed that this was something others would infer occurred as a result of an acid trip, but they both swore they had not taken or used any drugs.

The strophe reminds me of the famous 2nd piano concerto by Rachmaninoff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zapspace (talk • contribs) 17:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

References

Perhaps the Most Pet Sounds-like in production Beatles song?

I have just listened to this a few times recently and realised how similar in production style to Brian Wilson's in the Pet Sounds era. Note the flutes, the bass harmonica, acoustic guitar and double tracked vocals. It is certainly different in song structure - much more minor key oriented but production certainly seems to nod more to Pet Sounds than Sgt. Peppers. What does anybody else think? Not really worthy or mention is it?89.242.56.172 21:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:TheBeatlesMagicalMysteryTouralbumcover.jpg

The image Image:TheBeatlesMagicalMysteryTouralbumcover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi

I see Shirley Bassey mentioned under the links at bottom, but why is she not mentioned under COVERS? To me, that is the most beautiful version evdr of this song and was a grest success with this singer. --Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 08:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Harmonica

Both Lennon and Harrison are credited for "harmonica". But where in the song are these harmonicas? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.194.161.31 (talk) 17:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Homebrew Computer Club

Another editor has removed a section that described an early use of a personal computer to play this song. There are multiple sources that describe the event, and it may be the first example of a personal computer playing music, though the sources did not claim that. (The computer in question was one of the first computers one could call "personal", so it must be one of the first examples if not the first.) Given the subsequent convergence of personal computers and music that followed, the event seems notable to me. I propose we restore the content. — John Cardinal (talk) 13:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

The problem is that notability has not been established. As John suggests, if there were a WP:RS stating that this was some sort of a first, then maybe it would be notable (cf. Phonograph/Mary Had a Little Lamb) and could be referred to here but even then, the technical detail (Electromagnetic interference etc.) has no place on this page -- by all means include it on the Homebrew Computer Club page or a Computer Music page. Wrapped in Grey (talk) 17:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

• Support — John Cardinal (talk) 13:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
• Oppose — Wrapped in Grey (talk) 17:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Critical Reception

I don't think this section is fair at all. 86.42.248.108 (talk) 21:14, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Let's just delete this section; it's not needed for a non-single track. Wrapped in Grey (talk) 22:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

• http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=17:513103

--CactusBot (talk) 18:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Fool on the Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061228041713/http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg to http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=17:513103

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:33, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Fool on the Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214135622/http://www.q1043.com/common/top_songs/2012.html?page=2 to http://www.q1043.com/common/top_songs/2012.html?page=2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070305235010/http://unit.bjork.com/77island/early/index.htm to http://unit.bjork.com/77island/early/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Errors due to coding of references for various books used as citations

I added a link to song facts website because it explains in more detail about the man on Primrose Hill. The other link that was there was to a book by Alistair Turner, but when I added my cite the web it made the other link because not working and created red ink errors.It's very frustrating to be told to spend money to get a book to look up something, and I am sure very few people will bother to do that. Yesterday: The Beatles Remembered Book by Alistair Taylor who was Brian Epstein’s personal assistant is out of print and not available as a Kindle or eBook. I believe Song Facts took the information from that book. I would like to get a copy, but being that is out of print and a used hard cover, I feel that 27.50 plus shipping on Amazon is too much money when later the book may be release on the Kindle or other eBook system making it easier to obtain. I have added the book back to references using a template. I have added the correct 13 digit number, but it does not lead to a way to search the book, but it is easy for someone to search the title. The book does sound very interesting, and I would like to read it someday.Ty78ejui (talk) 15:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Sexy Sadie

Added note that this is one of 2 songs they did about the Maharishi.--Daveler16 (talk) 16:56, 13 September 2019 (UTC)