Jump to content

Talk:Jack Dorsey: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Siihb (talk | contribs)
Siihb (talk | contribs)
Line 48: Line 48:
Nonsense. Jack Dorsey is a criminal who, through his platform, aided a hostile foreign power in electing an illegitimate president. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2604:6000:120C:304:734D:C48A:9443:F1F8|2604:6000:120C:304:734D:C48A:9443:F1F8]] ([[User talk:2604:6000:120C:304:734D:C48A:9443:F1F8#top|talk]]) 21:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Nonsense. Jack Dorsey is a criminal who, through his platform, aided a hostile foreign power in electing an illegitimate president. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2604:6000:120C:304:734D:C48A:9443:F1F8|2604:6000:120C:304:734D:C48A:9443:F1F8]] ([[User talk:2604:6000:120C:304:734D:C48A:9443:F1F8#top|talk]]) 21:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


:: Take a few moments to look around the site. Everyone playing ball with certain "sides" like Jack Dorsey/Steve Huffman etc are blocked from having controversy sections. People who aren't protected, but have identical jobs, are Mark Zuckerberg for example. Leaving a few links here for those users who don't just read the first page of PR-apedia.
:: Take a few moments to look around the site. Everyone playing ball with certain "sides" like Jack Dorsey/Steve Huffman etc are blocked from having controversy sections. People who aren't protected, but have identical jobs, have controvery sections, like Mark Zuckerberg for example. Leaving a few Dorsey specific links, in response to this previous talk here for those users who don't just read the first page of PR-apedia.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/twitter-ceo-retweeted-alleged-russian-trolls
https://www.thedailybeast.com/twitter-ceo-retweeted-alleged-russian-trolls

Revision as of 09:41, 28 October 2019

Template:Vital article

Untitled

It may be true, but it sounds odd; a 14 year old, with an interest in developing dispatching software? There must be a bit more to it than that. Landroo (talk) 12:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am the great fan and supporter

Cosmic khanal (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Hi, this page seems to be closed to edits.

Just a suggstion:

Jack has said several times in public that he attended NYU and its computer science program, though did not graduate, and went to California in 1999. All this information is left out of his Wikipedia bio; I'm just wondering why? He doesn't hide the fact that he attended NYU, nor that he left without finishing. [I have no affiliation with either NYU or Twitter] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.70.117 (talk) 01:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


User:SusanLeschSudanLesch Hello susan, i don't know exactly if Fleetic is from jack dorsey, but i see articles in Forbesmagazine with responses about this "proyect" i don't have the link, if you type in google "jack dorsey forbes magazine", you can get more info about this. Regards

its been so long but i remember u now i cant get over ur eyes there beatiful 74.195.219.77 (talk) 20:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 74.195.219.77 (talk) 20:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another Suggestion

Doesn't this guy smoke a lot of Marijuana? Shouldn't that be noted? 76.90.115.62 (talk) 15:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, for the same reason one wouldn't mention someone smokes or drinks. Also, there would need to be reliable sources) Jeff Carr (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Jones

Dorsey has taken a stand to allow Alex Jones to exist on twitter as of today. It may be news worth, but I'm not comfortable adding something that controversial due to BLP policy. [1] [2] Jeff Carr (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies

Why isn't there a controversies section? Just Google "Jack Dorsey controversies" brings up numerous notable examples in the past few months. They should be represented here. Cody.berdinis (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:CSECTION. Such sections are generally inappropriate and to be avoided. —ADavidB 18:08, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You sure took another route when arguing for that Violence section on Arundel High School being a separate section. I am sure it wasn't due to any bias. Siihb (talk) 09:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. Jack Dorsey is a criminal who, through his platform, aided a hostile foreign power in electing an illegitimate president. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:120C:304:734D:C48A:9443:F1F8 (talk) 21:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take a few moments to look around the site. Everyone playing ball with certain "sides" like Jack Dorsey/Steve Huffman etc are blocked from having controversy sections. People who aren't protected, but have identical jobs, have controvery sections, like Mark Zuckerberg for example. Leaving a few Dorsey specific links, in response to this previous talk here for those users who don't just read the first page of PR-apedia.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/twitter-ceo-retweeted-alleged-russian-trolls https://fortune.com/2017/10/22/twitter-jack-dorsey-russian-troll/ https://www.newsweek.com/twitter-jack-dorsey-trolls-bots-plan-827670 https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/trump-other-politicians-celebs-shared-boosted-russian-troll-tweets-n817036

Siihb (talk) 08:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]