Jump to content

Talk:Mau Mau rebellion: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
NPOV?: new section
Line 59: Line 59:


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-49363653
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-49363653

== NPOV? ==

The parentheticals in the following section seems to be of questionably-neutral view, to me:

"By the mid-1960s, the view of Mau Mau as simply irrational activists was being challenged by memoirs of former members and leaders that portrayed Mau Mau as an essential, if radical, component of African nationalism in Kenya (of course this is denying the atrocities they committed against fellow tribesmen just to settle a score including the killing of school children), and by academic studies that analysed the movement as a modern and nationalist response to the unfairness and oppression of colonial domination (though such studies deliberately downplayed the specifically Kikuyu nature of the movement)."

[[Special:Contributions/167.15.253.45|167.15.253.45]] ([[User talk:167.15.253.45|talk]]) 18:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:13, 11 November 2019

Template:Vital article


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mau Mau Uprising. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two end dates?

The first sentence puts it at 1964, but in the infobox, its 1964.--Adûnâi (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to 1960 but it would be good to get something more definitive on the end date. 2620:0:690:7822:D572:5C84:22C2:4E55 (talk) 00:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concentration camps

Is it true the British used concentration camps in Kenya? (31.50.130.247 (talk) 15:36, 5 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]

== BBC is running a well detailed article on MauMau today --

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-49363653

NPOV?

The parentheticals in the following section seems to be of questionably-neutral view, to me:

"By the mid-1960s, the view of Mau Mau as simply irrational activists was being challenged by memoirs of former members and leaders that portrayed Mau Mau as an essential, if radical, component of African nationalism in Kenya (of course this is denying the atrocities they committed against fellow tribesmen just to settle a score including the killing of school children), and by academic studies that analysed the movement as a modern and nationalist response to the unfairness and oppression of colonial domination (though such studies deliberately downplayed the specifically Kikuyu nature of the movement)."

167.15.253.45 (talk) 18:13, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]