Talk:Thales Group: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2014; 2015; 2017; 2019; 2020;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 01:03, 17 November 2019

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

France: Paris Start‑class Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Paris task force.

Military history: Technology / European / French Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Electronics Start‑class Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

TeS Acquisitions

I wonder if the article should mention the [Thales e-Security] business? Organically speaking it's composed of the Racal Security/Payments business, nCipher, and Vormetric. https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/content/thales-completes-ncipher-acquisition and https://www.vormetric.com/company/newsroom/press-releases/thales-completes-acquisition-of-vormetric mention the latter two acquisitions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.104.142.199 (talk) 07:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, not TeS, but maybe the Guavas acquisition is worth a mention?

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

La Défense - Tour Carpe Diem.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:41, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with InterSense

InterSense is a subsidiary of the Thales Group that does not appear to meet notability guidelines (WP:NCORP, WP:GNG) on its own. I would propose a selective merge of non-promotional content to this article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

InterSense was the original company to develop MEMS based inertial based tracking. That history is the primary point of this article. If this article gets merged into that Thales Group, that history will be lost. _signed,RobertAtac ^talk 21:17, 6 Aug 2019 (EDT)

"Merge" does not mean "delete". There is no reason for pertinent information to be lost. Captainllama (talk) 08:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The history will be essentially lost when merged into the Thales Group as the Group is huge with many diverse holdings and product lines. Suggest a link from the Group page to this stand alone page. I worked pretty hard to get this little Wiki page up and I am against such a merge. _signed,RobertAtac ^talk 11:03, 9 Aug 2019 (EDT)

Support merge: with a rewrite, especially of the intro, as per MOS:JARGON. Merge decisions shouldn't be affected by how much work a self-disclosed paid contributor has put into an article, or their concerns about loss of article prominence. Edit: And I've just found this showing that the draft was deleted on three occasions, including twice for being "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Meticulo (talk) 11:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That the page was deleted in the past has absolutely nothing to do with the concept of merging the article. I fixed all of the offending stuff that got it to be deleted in the past. Keep the article independent. _signed,RobertAtac ^talk 20:03, 16 November 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:24, 22 September 2019 edit Meticulo (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,966 edits →Proposed merge with InterSense: edits own comment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:03, 17 November 2019 edit undo Robertatac (talk \| contribs) 84 edits →‎Proposed merge with InterSense Next edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:

	:'''Support merge''': with a rewrite, especially of the intro, as per [[MOS:JARGON]]. Merge decisions shouldn't be affected by how much work a self-disclosed paid contributor has put into an article, or their concerns about loss of article prominence. <em>Edit</em>: And I've just found [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:InterSense&action=edit&redlink=1 this] showing that the draft was deleted on three occasions, including twice for being "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". [[User:Meticulo\|Meticulo]] ([[User talk:Meticulo\|talk]]) 11:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)		:'''Support merge''': with a rewrite, especially of the intro, as per [[MOS:JARGON]]. Merge decisions shouldn't be affected by how much work a self-disclosed paid contributor has put into an article, or their concerns about loss of article prominence. <em>Edit</em>: And I've just found [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:InterSense&action=edit&redlink=1 this] showing that the draft was deleted on three occasions, including twice for being "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". [[User:Meticulo\|Meticulo]] ([[User talk:Meticulo\|talk]]) 11:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

			That the page was deleted in the past has absolutely nothing to do with the concept of merging the article. I fixed all of the offending stuff that got it to be deleted in the past. Keep the article independent. <sub> signed, </sub>[[user:robertatac\|'''''RobertAtac''''']] <sup>[[User talk:RobertAtac\|''talk'']]</sup> 20:03, 16 November 2019 (EDT)