User talk:Isarra: Difference between revisions
Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
: If it's not on the main Skin:MonoBook page it should probably be there. What were you looking for? -— [[User:Isarra|Isarra]] [[User talk:Isarra|༆]] 15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC) |
: If it's not on the main Skin:MonoBook page it should probably be there. What were you looking for? -— [[User:Isarra|Isarra]] [[User talk:Isarra|༆]] 15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
::{{re|Isarra}} I don't see anything at [[mw:Skin:MonoBook]]. We're working on some Main Page updates for mobile and trying to determine what impacts those using R-monobook would expect. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 01:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC) |
::{{re|Isarra}} I don't see anything at [[mw:Skin:MonoBook]]. We're working on some Main Page updates for mobile and trying to determine what impacts those using R-monobook would expect. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 01:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC) |
||
::: {{re|Xaosflux}} Yeah, I don't know. Don't know that anyone would. At that point I'd probably just recommend taking a private tab, ?useskin=monobook, and resizing it to test and make sure it seems reasonable to you, like any of the others; if it tiles properly in minerva or timeless it'll probably be fine there too regardless. Content itself should be a full-width block in all of them; beyond that if it works in desktop it shouldn't be much different in mobile. Thanks! -— [[User:Isarra|Isarra]] [[User talk:Isarra|༆]] 14:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:58, 9 February 2020
This is Isarra's talk page, where you may chat amicably with a bear. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|
||
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
ArbCom
Besides you, who else should I vote for and against? Thanks. Benjamin (talk) 04:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Would I really recommend me? Would I?
- Whatever the case, there's some pretty fancy statements and responses up, and plenty of folks also seem to have some pretty solid track records even aside from their nominations, if you want to sort out who they are. There are some others I might really wonder why they're there, given... sentiment, but maybe they're just doing what I'm doing, I dunno. -— Isarra ༆ 23:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- I thought you might not answer, but I had to ask. Thanks anyway. Benjamin (talk) 01:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry, I don't really follow things well enough to properly substantiate the particularly 'yikes' impressions, but others have done a pretty good job of explaining the actual issues, anyway. And I don't really want to bring anyone who I actually would recommend down by association, either. Like there's this one user who if I were taking this seriously, I would very much like to think my statement and responses and stuff would look like theirs... -— Isarra ༆ 02:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- I thought you might not answer, but I had to ask. Thanks anyway. Benjamin (talk) 01:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
December events with WIR
![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
![]()
![]()
|
Belated holiday greetings
↠Pine (✉) 16:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
![]()
![]()
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Project
Hi Isarra Could you contact me about a project? Mdougla (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdougla: Could you please be less vague? -— Isarra ༆ 19:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Yes! contact me at: <redacted> Mdougla (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdougla: Is it a secret project? -— Isarra ༆ 02:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Hired someone, thanks! Mdougla (talk)
- @Mdougla: Did your email intrigue them? It probably helps if they have the appropriate access to a Giant Gummy Lizard. -— Isarra ༆ 16:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Responsive Monobook
Hi Isarra, I heard you may know a bunch about responsive monobook? I mentioned you at Talk:Main_Page#Non-Mobile_minerva_and_responsive_monobook_issues, where you may be able to lend some insight if you have a moment. Also, do you know if there a main skin page on mw: that documents responsive monobook? — xaosflux Talk 00:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: I agree with whatever Jon says. (But seriously, thanks for the heads up.)
- If it's not on the main Skin:MonoBook page it should probably be there. What were you looking for? -— Isarra ༆ 15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Isarra: I don't see anything at mw:Skin:MonoBook. We're working on some Main Page updates for mobile and trying to determine what impacts those using R-monobook would expect. — xaosflux Talk 01:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Yeah, I don't know. Don't know that anyone would. At that point I'd probably just recommend taking a private tab, ?useskin=monobook, and resizing it to test and make sure it seems reasonable to you, like any of the others; if it tiles properly in minerva or timeless it'll probably be fine there too regardless. Content itself should be a full-width block in all of them; beyond that if it works in desktop it shouldn't be much different in mobile. Thanks! -— Isarra ༆ 14:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Isarra: I don't see anything at mw:Skin:MonoBook. We're working on some Main Page updates for mobile and trying to determine what impacts those using R-monobook would expect. — xaosflux Talk 01:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)