Jump to content

User talk:Isarra: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 173: Line 173:
: If it's not on the main Skin:MonoBook page it should probably be there. What were you looking for? -— [[User:Isarra|Isarra]] [[User talk:Isarra|༆]] 15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
: If it's not on the main Skin:MonoBook page it should probably be there. What were you looking for? -— [[User:Isarra|Isarra]] [[User talk:Isarra|༆]] 15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
::{{re|Isarra}} I don't see anything at [[mw:Skin:MonoBook]]. We're working on some Main Page updates for mobile and trying to determine what impacts those using R-monobook would expect. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 01:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
::{{re|Isarra}} I don't see anything at [[mw:Skin:MonoBook]]. We're working on some Main Page updates for mobile and trying to determine what impacts those using R-monobook would expect. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 01:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
::: {{re|Xaosflux}} Yeah, I don't know. Don't know that anyone would. At that point I'd probably just recommend taking a private tab, ?useskin=monobook, and resizing it to test and make sure it seems reasonable to you, like any of the others; if it tiles properly in minerva or timeless it'll probably be fine there too regardless. Content itself should be a full-width block in all of them; beyond that if it works in desktop it shouldn't be much different in mobile. Thanks! -— [[User:Isarra|Isarra]] [[User talk:Isarra|༆]] 14:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:58, 9 February 2020

ArbCom

Besides you, who else should I vote for and against? Thanks. Benjamin (talk) 04:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would I really recommend me? Would I?
Whatever the case, there's some pretty fancy statements and responses up, and plenty of folks also seem to have some pretty solid track records even aside from their nominations, if you want to sort out who they are. There are some others I might really wonder why they're there, given... sentiment, but maybe they're just doing what I'm doing, I dunno. -— Isarra 23:30, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I thought you might not answer, but I had to ask. Thanks anyway. Benjamin (talk) 01:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sorry, I don't really follow things well enough to properly substantiate the particularly 'yikes' impressions, but others have done a pretty good job of explaining the actual issues, anyway. And I don't really want to bring anyone who I actually would recommend down by association, either. Like there's this one user who if I were taking this seriously, I would very much like to think my statement and responses and stuff would look like theirs... -— Isarra 02:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December events with WIR

December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147


Check out what's happening in December at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

January 2020 at Women in Red

January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153


Happy Holidays from all of us at Women in Red, and thank you for your support in 2019. We look forward to working with you in 2020!

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Belated holiday greetings

February with Women in Red

February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155


Happy Valentine's Day from all of us at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Project

Hi Isarra Could you contact me about a project? Mdougla (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdougla: Could you please be less vague? -— Isarra 19:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! contact me at: <redacted> Mdougla (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdougla: Is it a secret project? -— Isarra 02:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You might need some sort of code. --Izno (talk) 02:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hired someone, thanks! Mdougla (talk)

@Mdougla: Did your email intrigue them? It probably helps if they have the appropriate access to a Giant Gummy Lizard. -— Isarra 16:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Responsive Monobook

Hi Isarra, I heard you may know a bunch about responsive monobook? I mentioned you at Talk:Main_Page#Non-Mobile_minerva_and_responsive_monobook_issues, where you may be able to lend some insight if you have a moment. Also, do you know if there a main skin page on mw: that documents responsive monobook? — xaosflux Talk 00:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: I agree with whatever Jon says. (But seriously, thanks for the heads up.)
If it's not on the main Skin:MonoBook page it should probably be there. What were you looking for? -— Isarra 15:47, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Isarra: I don't see anything at mw:Skin:MonoBook. We're working on some Main Page updates for mobile and trying to determine what impacts those using R-monobook would expect. — xaosflux Talk 01:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Xaosflux: Yeah, I don't know. Don't know that anyone would. At that point I'd probably just recommend taking a private tab, ?useskin=monobook, and resizing it to test and make sure it seems reasonable to you, like any of the others; if it tiles properly in minerva or timeless it'll probably be fine there too regardless. Content itself should be a full-width block in all of them; beyond that if it works in desktop it shouldn't be much different in mobile. Thanks! -— Isarra 14:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]