Talk:3D printing: Difference between revisions
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Not enough into on DIY industry == |
== Not enough into on DIY industry == |
||
The 3D printing DIY side of it is huge and barely mentioned in this mile long article. This is totally unrepresentative of reality. There's a huge industry making and selling 3d printers to diy hobbyist people. Where's all that info ? The number of affordable 3D printers must outnumber expensive commercial 3d printers by 10 or 20 to 1 or something like that. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.248.210.159|90.248.210.159]] ([[User talk:90.248.210.159#top|talk]]) 15:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The 3D printing DIY side of it is huge and barely mentioned in this mile long article. This is totally unrepresentative of reality. There's a huge industry making and selling 3d printers to diy hobbyist people. Where's all that info ? The number of affordable 3D printers must outnumber expensive commercial 3d printers by 10 or 20 to 1 or something like that. NO mention of Arduino and such yet the commercial stuff is mentioned ? This article is biased towards corporations producing state of the art 3D printers and nothing else. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/90.248.210.159|90.248.210.159]] ([[User talk:90.248.210.159#top|talk]]) 15:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== One of those things is not like the other == |
== One of those things is not like the other == |
Revision as of 15:19, 25 February 2020
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 3D printing article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Occupational Safety and Health B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Technology B‑class | |||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2014. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Cornell University/Online Communities (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Blakenyguen (article contribs).
This article is prone to spam. Please monitor the References and External links sections. |
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
The contents of the Selective heat sintering page were merged into 3D printing on 31 January 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
|
||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Steven Emers (article contribs).
Not enough into on DIY industry
The 3D printing DIY side of it is huge and barely mentioned in this mile long article. This is totally unrepresentative of reality. There's a huge industry making and selling 3d printers to diy hobbyist people. Where's all that info ? The number of affordable 3D printers must outnumber expensive commercial 3d printers by 10 or 20 to 1 or something like that. NO mention of Arduino and such yet the commercial stuff is mentioned ? This article is biased towards corporations producing state of the art 3D printers and nothing else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.248.210.159 (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
One of those things is not like the other
This page includes several examples of 3d printed structures: sculpture, pottery, a jet engine, cockring with perineum massager and and Audi RSQ.
The inclusion of the cockring is gratuitous, unnecessary and overall distracts from the story.
I've gone ahead and removed it, but it's pending review. Please approve. Thinkpoetry (talk) 14:19, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your contribution and posting here to explain it. Unfortunately it goes against one of the policies of Wikipedia, that Wikipedia is not censored. and so removing something as you find it objectionable is not appropriate. Absent another reason I have restored it.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 14:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
I get that it's good to have examples of what can be done with 3d printing, but does having a picture of a sex toy actually add anything of substance? 2600:8804:1E08:BE00:71A6:3225:4C7A:5682 (talk) 04:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Perhaps illustrating that it can produce products that are safe for human use? Honestly, though, if that was the intention, it might be more use to have something like a heart valve. — Sasuke Sarutobi (push to talk) 09:01, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
DVD copying added to Applications Section
I haven't been able to find a source on DVD copying using a 3D printer. If this is possible, I think it should be added to the Applications section. (PeacePeace (talk) 15:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC))
Split proposed
It seems that the Health and safety has grown long enough to consider splitting it into a new article, tenatively suggested as Health and safety hazards of 3D printing. Peaceray (talk) 20:37, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose "3D printing" is only a single coherent topic at the highest level. Anything in more depth than this shows how much variation there is between the different 3D printing processes. Certainly any H&S aspects would do. There's no coherence if we split horizontally like this at the top level, and with a vertical split to fused filament, vs. powder sinter, vs. resin cure would keep each small enough to not need such a further split. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
- Support I'm planning to refine and expand this section in the near future, which will make it too long to fit in this article anyway. There are similarities and differences between hazards of different types of 3D printing; inhalation of emissions is a pretty common one, and others like burns or laser exposure are relevant for some but not all types. The best approach is to have the broad-scope hazards article specify what hazards are relevant to what types of 3D printer, and have a short section in the article for each type that points back to the broad article. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 11:23, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Lead issue
Would it be possible for us to compile a list of all the things in the lead that aren’t later in the article? That seems to be the big problem right now... The Time to Llama is Now (talk) 23:46, 11 May 2019 (UTC)