Jump to content

Richard Epstein: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 63: Line 63:


==Writings==
==Writings==

=== Eminent domain ===

Epstein became famous in the American legal community in 1985 with [[Harvard University Press]]' publication of his book ''Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain''. In ''Takings'', Epstein argued that the "[[takings clause]]" of the [[Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution]]{{mdash}}which reads, "...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation", and is traditionally viewed as a limit on the governmental power of [[eminent domain]]{{mdash}}gives constitutional protection to citizens' economic rights,{{sfnp|Ely|2006|p=421}} and so requires the government to be regarded the same as any other private entity in a property dispute. The argument was controversial and sparked a great deal of debate on the interpretation of the "takings clause" after its publication. In 1991, during [[Clarence Thomas]]' [[Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination|Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearings]], Senator [[Joe Biden]], "in a dramatic movement," held the book up and "repeatedly interrogated" Thomas regarding his position on the book's thesis.{{sfnp|Ely|2006|p=421}} The book served as a focal point in the argument about the government's ability to control private property.<ref name="uchicago">[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/epsteintakings.html News release]</ref> The book has also influenced how some courts view property rights<ref name="reason">{{cite news | title = Takings Exception | author = Steve Chapman | publisher = Reason | date = April 1995 | url = http://www.reason.com/news/show/29662.html | accessdate = 2008-10-26 }}</ref> and has been cited by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] four times, including the 1992 case ''[[Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council]]''.<ref name="uchicago"/>
Epstein became famous in the American legal community in 1985 with [[Harvard University Press]]' publication of his book ''Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain''. In ''Takings'', Epstein argued that the "[[takings clause]]" of the [[Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution]]{{mdash}}which reads, "...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation", and is traditionally viewed as a limit on the governmental power of [[eminent domain]]{{mdash}}gives constitutional protection to citizens' economic rights,{{sfnp|Ely|2006|p=421}} and so requires the government to be regarded the same as any other private entity in a property dispute. The argument was controversial and sparked a great deal of debate on the interpretation of the "takings clause" after its publication. In 1991, during [[Clarence Thomas]]' [[Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination|Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearings]], Senator [[Joe Biden]], "in a dramatic movement," held the book up and "repeatedly interrogated" Thomas regarding his position on the book's thesis.{{sfnp|Ely|2006|p=421}} The book served as a focal point in the argument about the government's ability to control private property.<ref name="uchicago">[http://www.law.uchicago.edu/news/epsteintakings.html News release]</ref> The book has also influenced how some courts view property rights<ref name="reason">{{cite news | title = Takings Exception | author = Steve Chapman | publisher = Reason | date = April 1995 | url = http://www.reason.com/news/show/29662.html | accessdate = 2008-10-26 }}</ref> and has been cited by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] four times, including the 1992 case ''[[Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council]]''.<ref name="uchicago"/>

=== HIV pandemic ===

In 1988, at the height of the [[HIV pandemic]], Epstein argued that companies ought to be able to discriminate against “AIDS carriers” and that anti-discrimination laws were unfair to employers. In place of such laws, Epstein argued that “AIDS carriers” ought to have their health insurance premiums subsidized via taxation so as to “discipline the behavior of government and interests groups, here by requiring citizens to make choices about how much they individually are prepared to pay to subsidize AIDS carriers.” Furthermore, he argued that “[t]here is no reason to suppose that any public benefit obtained from having employers and their insurers care for AIDS victims will be at some level that matches the additional costs that are imposed.” Instead, Epstein proposed that employers have the right to refuse to hire suspected “AIDS carriers.”<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Epstein|first=Dick|date=|title=AIDS, Testing and the Workplace|url=https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1034&context=uclf|journal=University of Chicago Legal Forum|volume=1988|pages=33-56|via=}}</ref>

=== Opposition to Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Defense of Marriage Act ===


Epstein is an advocate of minimal legal regulation. In his book ''Simple Rules for a Complex World'' (1995), Epstein consolidated much of his previous work and argues that simple rules work best because complexities create excessive costs. Complexity comes from attempting to do justice in individual cases. Complex rules are justifiable, however, if they can be opted out of. For instance, drawing on [[Gary Becker]], he argues that the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964|Civil Rights Act]] and other [[anti-discrimination]] legislation would be better if they were repealed. Consistent with the principles of [[classical liberalism]], he believes that the federal regulation on [[same-sex marriage]], the [[Defense of Marriage Act]], should be repealed,<ref>{{cite magazine | title = Judicial Offensive Against Defense Of Marriage Act | author =Richard A. Epstein | magazine = Forbes | date = 2010-07-12 | url = https://www.forbes.com/2010/07/12/gay-marriage-massachusetts-supreme-court-opinions-columnists-richard-a-epstein.html | accessdate = 2010-09-06 }}</ref> stating:
Epstein is an advocate of minimal legal regulation. In his book ''Simple Rules for a Complex World'' (1995), Epstein consolidated much of his previous work and argues that simple rules work best because complexities create excessive costs. Complexity comes from attempting to do justice in individual cases. Complex rules are justifiable, however, if they can be opted out of. For instance, drawing on [[Gary Becker]], he argues that the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964|Civil Rights Act]] and other [[anti-discrimination]] legislation would be better if they were repealed. Consistent with the principles of [[classical liberalism]], he believes that the federal regulation on [[same-sex marriage]], the [[Defense of Marriage Act]], should be repealed,<ref>{{cite magazine | title = Judicial Offensive Against Defense Of Marriage Act | author =Richard A. Epstein | magazine = Forbes | date = 2010-07-12 | url = https://www.forbes.com/2010/07/12/gay-marriage-massachusetts-supreme-court-opinions-columnists-richard-a-epstein.html | accessdate = 2010-09-06 }}</ref> stating:
Line 74: Line 83:


Contributing to the anthology ''Our American Story'' (2019), Epstein addressed the possibility of a shared American narrative. Taking a decidedly skeptical approach, Epstein concluded that no new national narrative can be achieved "unless we engage in what I call American minimalism—a conscious reduction of the issues that we think are truly best handled as a nation and not better address by smaller subnational groups: states, local governments, and, most importantly, all sorts of small private organizations that are free to choose as they please in setting their own membership and mission."<ref>{{cite book |editor-last1=Claybourn |editor-first1=Joshua |editor-link1=Joshua Claybourn |title=Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative |date=2019 |publisher=Potomac Books |location=Lincoln, NE |isbn=978-1640121706 |pages=175–188 }}</ref>
Contributing to the anthology ''Our American Story'' (2019), Epstein addressed the possibility of a shared American narrative. Taking a decidedly skeptical approach, Epstein concluded that no new national narrative can be achieved "unless we engage in what I call American minimalism—a conscious reduction of the issues that we think are truly best handled as a nation and not better address by smaller subnational groups: states, local governments, and, most importantly, all sorts of small private organizations that are free to choose as they please in setting their own membership and mission."<ref>{{cite book |editor-last1=Claybourn |editor-first1=Joshua |editor-link1=Joshua Claybourn |title=Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative |date=2019 |publisher=Potomac Books |location=Lincoln, NE |isbn=978-1640121706 |pages=175–188 }}</ref>

=== Coronavirus pandemic ===


In March 2020, Epstein wrote several essays published by the [[Hoover Institution]] giving a contrarian account of the ongoing Coronavirus outbreak, suggesting that the public health consensus was an overreaction. <ref>{{cite news | title = Coronavirus Perspective| author =Richard A. Epstein | publisher = Hoover Institution | date = 2020-03-16 | url = https://www.hoover.org/research/coronavirus-isnt-pandemic | accessdate = 2020-03-29 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | title = Coronavirus Overreaction| author =Richard A. Epstein | publisher = Hoover Institution | date = 2020-03-23 | url = https://www.hoover.org/research/coronavirus-overreaction | accessdate = 2020-03-29 }}</ref> He compares Covid 19 to the [[2009 H1N1 pandemic]], and suggests that public health measures "are done better at the level of plants, hotels, restaurants, and schools than remotely by political leaders." These essays circulated in conservative circles and in the White House upon their publication.<ref>{{cite news | title = The Contrarian Coronavirus Theory That Informed the Trump Administration| author =Isaac Chotiner | publisher = The New yorker | date = 2020-03-30 | url = https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-contrarian-coronavirus-theory-that-informed-the-trump-administration | accessdate = 2020-03-30 }}</ref> Epstein's views are "strongly disputed by medical professionals." In an interview, Epstein was challenged on this and reacted strongly to this criticism:
In March 2020, Epstein wrote several essays published by the [[Hoover Institution]] giving a contrarian account of the ongoing Coronavirus outbreak, suggesting that the public health consensus was an overreaction. <ref>{{cite news | title = Coronavirus Perspective| author =Richard A. Epstein | publisher = Hoover Institution | date = 2020-03-16 | url = https://www.hoover.org/research/coronavirus-isnt-pandemic | accessdate = 2020-03-29 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | title = Coronavirus Overreaction| author =Richard A. Epstein | publisher = Hoover Institution | date = 2020-03-23 | url = https://www.hoover.org/research/coronavirus-overreaction | accessdate = 2020-03-29 }}</ref> He compares Covid 19 to the [[2009 H1N1 pandemic]], and suggests that public health measures "are done better at the level of plants, hotels, restaurants, and schools than remotely by political leaders." These essays circulated in conservative circles and in the White House upon their publication.<ref>{{cite news | title = The Contrarian Coronavirus Theory That Informed the Trump Administration| author =Isaac Chotiner | publisher = The New yorker | date = 2020-03-30 | url = https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-contrarian-coronavirus-theory-that-informed-the-trump-administration | accessdate = 2020-03-30 }}</ref> Epstein's views are "strongly disputed by medical professionals." In an interview, Epstein was challenged on this and reacted strongly to this criticism:

Revision as of 18:36, 30 March 2020

This article is about the legal scholar. For the game theorist, see Richard Arnold Epstein.
Richard A. Epstein
Epstein at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School in 2018
Born (1943-04-17) April 17, 1943 (age 81)
Brooklyn, New York, U.S.
EducationColumbia University (B.A.)
Oriel College, Oxford (1st)
Yale University (LL.B.)
Employer(s)New York University
University of Chicago
Hoover Institution
Known for"Takings" law, law and economics, classical liberalism
SpouseEileen
Children3
AwardsBradley Prize (2011)
American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1985)

Richard Allen Epstein (born April 17, 1943) is an American legal scholar known for his writings on subjects such as torts, contracts, property rights, law and economics, classical liberalism, and libertarianism. Epstein is currently the Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law and director of the Classical Liberal Institute at New York University, the Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and the James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law emeritus and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago. In March 2020, Epstein influenced the Trump administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic with his writings where he attacked measures to enforce social distancing, claimed the Coronavirus was not a "pandemic," and predicted there would ultimately be 500 American deaths.[1][2][3]

Epstein's writings have extensively influenced American legal thought. In 2000, a study published in The Journal of Legal Studies identified Epstein as the 12th-most cited legal scholar of the 20th century. In 2008, he was chosen in a poll taken by Legal Affairs as one of the most influential legal thinkers of modern times. A study of legal publications between 2009 and 2013 found Epstein to be the 3rd-most frequently cited American legal scholar during that period, behind only Cass Sunstein and Erwin Chemerinsky. He has been a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences since 1985.

Life and career

Richard A. Epstein was born on April 17, 1943, in Brooklyn, New York. His grandparents were Ashkenazi Jews who immigrated to the United States from Russia and Austria in the early 20th century. Epstein's father, Bernard Epstein (1908–1978), was a radiologist, and his mother, Catherine Epstein (née Reiser; 1908–2004), managed his father's medical office.[4] He has two sisters. He attended elementary school at P.S. 161, a school that is now one of the Success Academy Charter Schools.[5] Epstein and his family lived in Brooklyn until 1954, when his father began working at the Long Island Jewish Medical Center and their family moved to Great Neck, Long Island.[5]

Epstein attended Columbia University as an undergraduate student in the early 1960s. He had wide-ranging academic interests and did not wish to select a traditional single major, and obtained special permission from the university to pursue a self-selected program of study across the three areas of sociology, philosophy, and mathematics. He graduated with a B.A. summa cum laude in 1964. Epstein's undergraduate performance earned him a Kellett Fellowship, an award at Columbia that pays for two of each year's top graduates to spend two years in England studying at either Cambridge University or Oxford University. Epstein chose to attend Oxford, where he was a member of Oriel College and earned a first-class honours B.A. in jurisprudence in 1966. He then returned to the United States to attend the Yale Law School, graduating with an LL.B. cum laude in 1968.

After graduating from law school, Epstein was hired as an assistant professor of law at the University of Southern California (USC). He taught at USC for four years before moving to the University of Chicago Law School in 1972. Epstein taught at Chicago for 38 years, eventually holding the title of James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law. Epstein formally retired from Chicago in 2010, but quickly came out of retirement to join the faculty of New York University as its inaugural Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law. He remains a professor emeritus and senior lecturer at Chicago, teaching courses there on an occasional basis. In 2013, New York University's School of Law established a new academic research center, the Classical Liberal Institute, and named Epstein as its inaugural director.[6]

Since 2001, Epstein has served as the Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, a prominent American public policy think tank located at Stanford University.

Epstein has served in many academic and public organizations and has received a number of awards. In 1983, Epstein was made a senior fellow at the Center for Clinical Medical Ethics at the University of Chicago Medical School, and in 1985 was inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.[7] He was editor of the Journal of Legal Studies from 1981 to 1991, and was editor of the Journal of Law and Economics from 1991 to 2001. In 2003, Epstein received an honorary LL.D. degree from the University of Ghent, and in 2018 received an honorary doctorate in law from the University of Siegen.[8] In 2005 the College of William & Mary awarded him the Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Prize for his contributions to the field of property rights,[9] In 2011, he was awarded a Bradley Prize by the Bradley Foundation.[10]

Writings

Eminent domain

Epstein became famous in the American legal community in 1985 with Harvard University Press' publication of his book Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. In Takings, Epstein argued that the "takings clause" of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution—which reads, "...nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation", and is traditionally viewed as a limit on the governmental power of eminent domain—gives constitutional protection to citizens' economic rights,[11] and so requires the government to be regarded the same as any other private entity in a property dispute. The argument was controversial and sparked a great deal of debate on the interpretation of the "takings clause" after its publication. In 1991, during Clarence Thomas' Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearings, Senator Joe Biden, "in a dramatic movement," held the book up and "repeatedly interrogated" Thomas regarding his position on the book's thesis.[11] The book served as a focal point in the argument about the government's ability to control private property.[12] The book has also influenced how some courts view property rights[13] and has been cited by the U.S. Supreme Court four times, including the 1992 case Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council.[12]

HIV pandemic

In 1988, at the height of the HIV pandemic, Epstein argued that companies ought to be able to discriminate against “AIDS carriers” and that anti-discrimination laws were unfair to employers. In place of such laws, Epstein argued that “AIDS carriers” ought to have their health insurance premiums subsidized via taxation so as to “discipline the behavior of government and interests groups, here by requiring citizens to make choices about how much they individually are prepared to pay to subsidize AIDS carriers.” Furthermore, he argued that “[t]here is no reason to suppose that any public benefit obtained from having employers and their insurers care for AIDS victims will be at some level that matches the additional costs that are imposed.” Instead, Epstein proposed that employers have the right to refuse to hire suspected “AIDS carriers.”[14]

Opposition to Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Defense of Marriage Act

Epstein is an advocate of minimal legal regulation. In his book Simple Rules for a Complex World (1995), Epstein consolidated much of his previous work and argues that simple rules work best because complexities create excessive costs. Complexity comes from attempting to do justice in individual cases. Complex rules are justifiable, however, if they can be opted out of. For instance, drawing on Gary Becker, he argues that the Civil Rights Act and other anti-discrimination legislation would be better if they were repealed. Consistent with the principles of classical liberalism, he believes that the federal regulation on same-sex marriage, the Defense of Marriage Act, should be repealed,[15] stating:

Under our law, only the state may issue marriage licenses. That power carries with it a duty to serve all-comers on equal terms, which means that the state should not be able to pick and choose those on whom it bestows its favors. DOMA offends this principle in two ways. First, it excludes polygamous couples from receiving these marital benefits. Second, it excludes gay couples. Both groups contribute to the funds that support these various government programs. Both should share in its benefits.

He has criticized the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.[16][17]

In The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government, he employs close textual reading, historical analysis, and political and economic theory to urge a return to the classical liberal theory of governance that animated the framers' original text, and to the limited government this theory supports.

Contributing to the anthology Our American Story (2019), Epstein addressed the possibility of a shared American narrative. Taking a decidedly skeptical approach, Epstein concluded that no new national narrative can be achieved "unless we engage in what I call American minimalism—a conscious reduction of the issues that we think are truly best handled as a nation and not better address by smaller subnational groups: states, local governments, and, most importantly, all sorts of small private organizations that are free to choose as they please in setting their own membership and mission."[18]

Coronavirus pandemic

In March 2020, Epstein wrote several essays published by the Hoover Institution giving a contrarian account of the ongoing Coronavirus outbreak, suggesting that the public health consensus was an overreaction. [19][20] He compares Covid 19 to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, and suggests that public health measures "are done better at the level of plants, hotels, restaurants, and schools than remotely by political leaders." These essays circulated in conservative circles and in the White House upon their publication.[21] Epstein's views are "strongly disputed by medical professionals." In an interview, Epstein was challenged on this and reacted strongly to this criticism:

You know nothing about the subject but are so confident that you’re going to say that I’m a crackpot. [...] Admit to it. You’re saying I’m a crackpot. [...] Well, what am I then? I’m an amateur? You’re the great scholar on this? [...] You just don’t know anything about anything. You’re a journalist. Would you like to compare your résumé to mine?[22]

In the same interview, Epstein claimed that Bill Gates agreed with his views. Informed that Gates had in fact rebuked proposals such as his, he claimed to have misread him.

Influence

In 2006, the American scholar James W. Ely Jr. wrote: "It is a widely accepted premise that Professor Richard A. Epstein has exercised a pervasive influence on American legal thought."[11] A study published in The Journal of Legal Studies in 2000 identified Epstein as the 12th-most cited legal scholar of the entire 20th century.[23] In 2008, he was chosen in a poll taken by Legal Affairs as one of the most influential legal thinkers of modern times.[24] A study of legal publications between 2009 and 2013 found Epstein to be the 3rd most frequently cited American legal scholar, behind only Cass Sunstein and Erwin Chemerinsky.[25]

In March 2020, Epstein influenced the Trump administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic with his writings where he attacked measures to enforce social distancing, and claimed the coronavirus was not a "pandemic".[1][2][3]

Politics

Epstein has said that when voting, he chooses "anyone but the Big Two" who are "just two members of the same statist party fighting over whose friends will get favors".[citation needed] He has voted Libertarian.[26] Epstein says he is "certainly a Calvin Coolidge fan; he made some mistakes, but he was a small-government guy".[26] Epstein served on The Constitution Project's Guantanamo Task Force.[27][28][29]

In early 2015, Epstein commented on his relationship to the modern American political landscape, stating: "I'm in this very strange position: I'm not a conservative when it comes to religious values and so forth, but I do believe, in effect, in a strong foreign policy and a relatively small domestic government, but that's not the same thing as saying I believe in no government at all."[30] He has also been characterized as a libertarian conservative.[31][32] During a debate with Chris Preble in December 2016, Epstein identified himself as being a "libertarian hawk."[33]

Personal life

Epstein's wife, Eileen W. Epstein, is a fundraiser and educator who serves on the board of trustees for the philanthropic organization American Jewish World Service. They have three children: two sons, Benjamin M. and Elliot, and a daughter, Melissa. Epstein is a first cousin of the comedian and actor Paul Reiser.[34]

Epstein has described himself as "a rather weak, non-practicing Jew."[35]

Selected works

  • Epstein, Richard A. (1973). "A Theory of Strict Liability". Journal of Legal Studies. 2 (1): 151–204. doi:10.1086/467495.
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1975). "Unconscionability: A Critical Reappraisal". Journal of Law and Economics. 18 (2): 293–315. doi:10.1086/466814. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A.; Gregory, Charles; Kalven, Harry (1977). Cases and Materials on the Law of Torts (3rd ed.). New York: Little, Brown & Co. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help) 4th edition (1984), New York: Little, Brown & Co.
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1979). "Nuisance Law: Corrective Justice and Its Utilitarian Constraints". Journal of Legal Studies. 8 (1): 49–102. doi:10.1086/467602. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1983). "A Common Law for Labor Relations: A Critique of the New Deal Labor Legislation". Yale Law Journal. 92 (8): 1357–1408. doi:10.2307/796178. JSTOR 796178. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1984). "In Defense of the Contract at Will". University of Chicago Law Review. 51 (4): 947–82. doi:10.2307/1599554. JSTOR 1599554. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1985). Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674867297. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1987). "The Proper Scope of the Commerce Power". Virginia Law Review. 73 (8): 1387–1455. doi:10.2307/1073233. JSTOR 1073233. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1988). "Foreword: Unconstitutional Conditions, State Power, and the Limits of Consent". Harvard Law Review. 102 (1): 4–104. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A.; Sharkey, Catherine M. (2016). Cases and Materials on Torts (11th ed.). New York: Aspen Casebooks. ISBN 978-1454868255. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1992). Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674308084. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A.; Stone, Geoffrey R.; Sunstein, Cass R. (1992). The Bill of Rights in the Modern State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0226775326. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1995). Simple Rules for a Complex World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674808218. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1997). "The Clear View of The Cathedral: The Dominance of Property Rules". Yale Law Journal. 106 (7): 2091–2120. doi:10.2307/797162. JSTOR 797162. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A.; Sunstein, Cass R. (2001). The Vote: Bush, Gore & the Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0226213071. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (2011). Design for Liberty: Private Property, Public Administration, and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674061842. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (2014). The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0674724891. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)
  • Epstein, Richard A. (2020). The Dubious Morality of Modern Administrative Law. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-5381-4149-6. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authormask= ignored (|author-mask= suggested) (help)

See also

References

Footnotes
  1. ^ a b https://www.hoover.org/research/coronavirus-isnt-pandemic
  2. ^ a b Chotiner, Isaac. "The Contrarian Coronavirus Theory That Informed the Trump Administration". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
  3. ^ a b "Trump weighs restarting economy despite warnings from U.S. public health officials". The Washington Post. 2020.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  4. ^ Frey (2009).
  5. ^ a b Troy Senik; Richard Epstein (29 July 2015). "The Education of a Libertarian". The Libertarian Podcast (Podcast). Hoover Institution. Retrieved 6 September 2015.{{cite podcast}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ "Classical Liberal Institute launched at conference on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac". NYU School of Law. 20 September 2013. Retrieved 12 July 2015.
  7. ^ Richard A. Epstein, University of Chicago.
  8. ^ "Universität Siegen zeichnet Richard A. Epstein aus" (in German). Retrieved 2018-10-11.
  9. ^ "Hoover Fellow Richard A. Epstein Honored With Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Prize From College of William and Mary Law School". Hoover.org.
  10. ^ Recipients – The Bradley Prizes
  11. ^ a b c Ely (2006), p. 421.
  12. ^ a b News release
  13. ^ Steve Chapman (April 1995). "Takings Exception". Reason. Retrieved 2008-10-26.
  14. ^ Epstein, Dick. "AIDS, Testing and the Workplace". University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1988: 33–56.
  15. ^ Richard A. Epstein (2010-07-12). "Judicial Offensive Against Defense Of Marriage Act". Forbes. Retrieved 2010-09-06.
  16. ^ Richard A. Epstein (2015-06-29). "Hard Questions On Same-Sex Marriage". Hoover Institution. Retrieved 2018-01-03.
  17. ^ Mark Joseph Stern (2015-07-02). "Richard Epstein on Obergefell". Slate.
  18. ^ Claybourn, Joshua, ed. (2019). Our American Story: The Search for a Shared National Narrative. Lincoln, NE: Potomac Books. pp. 175–188. ISBN 978-1640121706.
  19. ^ Richard A. Epstein (2020-03-16). "Coronavirus Perspective". Hoover Institution. Retrieved 2020-03-29.
  20. ^ Richard A. Epstein (2020-03-23). "Coronavirus Overreaction". Hoover Institution. Retrieved 2020-03-29.
  21. ^ Isaac Chotiner (2020-03-30). "The Contrarian Coronavirus Theory That Informed the Trump Administration". The New yorker. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
  22. ^ Isaac Chotiner (2020-03-30). "The Contrarian Coronavirus Theory That Informed the Trump Administration". The New yorker. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
  23. ^ Shapiro, Fred R. (2000). "The Most-Cited Legal Scholars". Journal of Legal Studies. 29 (1): 409–26. doi:10.1086/468080.
  24. ^ 2014 Scholarly Impact – Leitner Rankings.
  25. ^ a b "Who's Getting Your Vote?". Reason. November 2004. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
  26. ^ "Task Force members". The Constitution Project. 2010-12-17. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-12-18. Retrieved 2015-06-11.
  27. ^ "Task Force on Detainee Treatment Launched". The Constitution Project. 2010-12-17. Archived from the original on 2010-12-18.
  28. ^ "Think tank plans study of how US treats detainees". Wall Street Journal. 2010-12-17. Archived from the original on 2010-12-18.
  29. ^ "Special Edition: Epstein and Levin on Progressivism, Classical Liberalism, and Conservatism", The Libertarian Podcast, Hoover Institution, 4 February 2015.
  30. ^ Piper, J. Richard (1997-01-01). Ideologies and Institutions: American Conservative and Liberal Governance Prescriptions Since 1933. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0847684595.
  31. ^ "Defining Richard Epstein: A renowned libertarian takes on a new mantle | NYU School of Law". www.law.nyu.edu. Retrieved 2016-10-07.
  32. ^ "US INvolvement in War.," Dec. 12, 2016
  33. ^ http://ricochet.com/main-feed/The-Chicken-or-The-Egg
  34. ^ Troy Senik, Richard Epstein (31 March 2015). "Indiana, Discrimination, and Religious Liberty". The Libertarian (Podcast). Hoover Institution. Retrieved 11 April 2015.
Works cited
  • Ely, James W. (2006). "Impact of Richard A. Epstein" (PDF). William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal. 15 (2): 421–28. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Anthony Ogus, 'The Power and Perils of Simple Ideas and Simple Rules' (1997) 17 (1) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, reviewing Simple rules for a complex world
  • Frey, Jennifer S. (2009). "Introducing Richard Epstein". NYU Law Magazine. Retrieved 23 March 2015. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |registration=, |editors=, |subscription=, and |separator= (help)

Further reading

External links

Wikiquote has quotations related to Richard Epstein.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Epstein&oldid=948204463"