||This biographical article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2013)|
Nobel Prize Laureate Eugene F. Fama in Stockholm, December 2013.
February 14, 1939 |
|Institution||University of Chicago|
School or tradition
|Chicago School of Economics|
|Alma mater||Tufts University
University of Chicago
|Contributions||Fama–French three-factor model
|Awards||2005 Deutsche Bank Prize in Financial Economics
2008 Morgan Stanley-American Finance Association Award
Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics (2013)
|Information at IDEAS / RePEc|
Eugene Francis "Gene" Fama (//; born February 14, 1939) is an American economist and Nobel laureate in Economics, known for his work on portfolio theory, asset pricing and stock market behaviour, both theoretical and empirical.
He is currently Robert R. McCormick Distinguished Service Professor of Finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. In 2013 he shared the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences jointly with Robert Shiller and Lars Peter Hansen.
Fama was born in Boston, Massachusetts, the son of Angelina (née Sarraceno) and Francis Fama. All of his grandparents were immigrants from Italy. Fama is a Malden Catholic High School Athletic Hall of Fame honoree. He earned his undergraduate degree in Romance Languages magna cum laude in 1960 from Tufts University where he was also selected as the school’s outstanding student-athlete.
His M.B.A. and Ph.D. came from the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago in economics and finance. His doctoral supervisors were Nobel prize winner Merton Miller and Harry Roberts, but Benoit Mandelbrot was also an important influence. He has spent all of his teaching career at the University of Chicago.
His Ph.D. thesis, which concluded that stock price movements are unpredictable and follow a random walk, was published in January 1965 issue of the Journal of Business, entitled "The Behavior of Stock Market Prices". That work was subsequently rewritten into a less technical article, "Random Walks In Stock Market Prices", which was published in the Financial Analysts Journal in 1965 and Institutional Investor in 1968.
His article "The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information" in the International Economic Review, 1969 (with several co-authors) was the first event study that sought to analyze how stock prices respond to an event, using price data from the newly available CRSP database. This was the first of literally hundreds of such published studies.
In 2013, he won the The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, colloquially called the Nobel Prize in Economics.
Efficient market hypothesis
Fama is most often thought of as the father of the efficient-market hypothesis, beginning with his Ph.D. thesis. In 1965 he published an analysis of the behaviour of stock market prices that showed that they exhibited so-called fat tail distribution properties, implying extreme movements were more common than predicted on the assumption of Normality.
In a ground-breaking article in the May 1970 issue of the Journal of Finance, entitled "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work,"  Fama proposed two crucial concepts that have defined the conversation on efficient markets ever since. First, Fama proposed three types of efficiency: (i) strong-form; (ii) semi-strong form; and (iii) weak efficiency. They are explained in the context of what information sets are factored in price trend. In weak form efficiency the information set is just historical prices, which can be predicted from historical price trend; thus, it is impossible to profit from it. Semi-strong form requires that all public information is reflected in prices already, such as companies' announcements or annual earnings figures. Finally, the strong-form concerns all information sets, including private information, are incorporated in price trend; it states no monopolistic information can entail profits, in other words, insider trading cannot make a profit in the strong-form market efficiency world. Second, Fama demonstrated that the notion of market efficiency could not be rejected without an accompanying rejection of the model of market equilibrium (e.g. the price setting mechanism). This concept, known as the "joint hypothesis problem," has ever since vexed researchers. Market efficiency denotes how information is factored in price, Fama (1970) emphasizes that the hypothesis of market efficiency must be tested in the context of expected returns. The joint hypothesis problem states that when a model yields a predicted return significantly different from the actual return, one can never be certain if there exists an imperfection in the model or if the market is inefficient. Researchers can only modify their models by adding different factors to eliminate any anomalies, in hopes of fully explaining the return within the model. The anomaly, also known as alpha in the modeling test, thus functions as a signal to the model maker whether it can perfectly predict returns by the factors in the model. However, as long as there exists an alpha, neither the conclusion of a flawed model nor market inefficiency can be drawn according to the Joint Hypothesis. Fama (1991) also stresses that market efficiency per se is not testable and can only be tested jointly with some model of equilibrium, i.e. an asset-pricing model.
Fama–French three-factor model
In recent years, Fama has become controversial again, for a series of papers, co-written with Kenneth French, that cast doubt on the validity of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which posits that a stock's beta alone should explain its average return. These papers describe two factors above and beyond a stock's market beta which can explain differences in stock returns: market capitalization and "value". They also offer evidence that a variety of patterns in average returns, often labeled as "anomalies" in past work, can be explained with their Fama–French three-factor model.
- The Theory of Finance, Dryden Press, 1972
- Foundations of Finance: Portfolio Decisions and Securities Prices, Basic Books, 1976
- The Prize in Economic Sciences 2013, nobelprize.org, retrieved 14 October 2013
- 3 US Economists Win Nobel for Work on Asset Prices, abc news, October 14, 2013
- Colin Read, The Efficient Market Hypothesists: Bachelier, Samuelson, Fama, Ross, Tobin and Shiller, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, p. 94
- Ritter, Karl; Rising, Malin (2013-10-14). "3 Americans win Nobel prize in economics". Boston Globe. Retrieved 2013-10-14.
- "Mathematics Genealogy Project". Genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu. Retrieved 2013-10-14.
- Fama, Eugene F. (September–October 1965). "Random Walks In Stock Market Prices". Financial Analysts Journal 21 (5): 55–59. doi:10.2469/faj.v21.n5.55.
- "The behavior of stock-market prices." Journal of business (1965): 34-105
- Q&A: Confidence in the Bell Curve - interview with Fama 2009
- "EFFICIENT CAPITAL MARKETS: A REVIEW OF THEORY AND EMPIRICAL WORK – Malkiel – 2012 – The Journal of Finance – Wiley Online Library". Onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Retrieved 2013-10-14.
- Fama, Eugene F.; French, Kenneth R. (1993). "Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds". Journal of Financial Economics 33 (1): 3–56. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5.
|Wikiquote has quotations related to: Eugene Fama|
- Media related to Eugene Fama at Wikimedia Commons
- Faculty profile at the University of Chicago
- List of published works
- Biography on Dimensional Fund Advisors website
- The Fama/French Forum – Observations, opinion, research and links from financial economists Eugene Fama and Kenneth French.
- Eugene Fama at the Mathematics Genealogy Project
- Eugene Fama, 2005 winner of the Deutsche Bank Prize in Financial Economics
- Appearances on C-SPAN
- Eugene Fama at the Internet Movie Database
- Works by or about Eugene Fama in libraries (WorldCat catalog)
- Roberts, Russ (January 30, 2012). "Fama on Finance". EconTalk. Library of Economics and Liberty.
- Peter Schiff analyses Fama's expertise on YouTube
- Schwert, G. William and Stutz, Rena M. "Gene Fama’s Impact: A Quantitative Analysis." Sept. 2014, i + 30 pp.