User talk:Brian Fairchild: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 87.116.179.10 - "→June 2020: " |
No edit summary |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
Brian <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.116.179.10|87.116.179.10]] ([[User talk:87.116.179.10#top|talk]]) 10:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Brian <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.116.179.10|87.116.179.10]] ([[User talk:87.116.179.10#top|talk]]) 10:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:Explain then how it is that your submission is word-for-word identical to the document submitted to Upwork as requested Wikipedia content by the owner of Business Digest Magazine? In fact, don't bother... [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]] [[User talk:Yunshui|<sup style="font-size:90%">雲</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<sub style="font-size:90%">水</sub>]] 07:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for violations of Wikipedia's [[WP:COPYVIO|copyright policy]] and [[wmf:TOU|Terms of Use]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]] [[User talk:Yunshui|<sup style="font-size:90%">雲</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<sub style="font-size:90%">水</sub>]] 07:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
Revision as of 07:24, 9 June 2020
Welcome
|
This is Brian Fairchild's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Business Digest Magazine (May 29)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Business Digest Magazine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Business Digest Magazine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Brian Fairchild!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
|
June 2020
Hello Brian Fairchild. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Brian Fairchild. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Brian Fairchild|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 GSS 💬 05:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
I am not being paid, was seeing if I was knowledgeable enough to create a page for a friend and apparently lack the skills necessary to create a page effectively. Thank you for looking out.
Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.116.179.10 (talk) 10:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- Explain then how it is that your submission is word-for-word identical to the document submitted to Upwork as requested Wikipedia content by the owner of Business Digest Magazine? In fact, don't bother... Yunshui 雲水 07:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Yunshui 雲水 07:24, 9 June 2020 (UTC)