User talk:EditorF: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
1. the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. |
1. the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. |
||
2. the block is no longer necessary because I understood reason why I have been blocked . |
2. the block is no longer necessary because I understood reason why I have been blocked . |
||
3. understand |
3. I understand that I have been blocked for using multiple accounts which I was not aware not to use . |
||
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, I will make sure |
I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, I will make sure that I make useful contributions to wikipedia . [[User:EditorF|EditorF]] ([[User talk:EditorF#top|talk]]) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)}} |
||
will make useful contributions instead. [[User:EditorF|EditorF]] ([[User talk:EditorF#top|talk]]) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 13:25, 13 July 2020
July 2020
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:EditorF, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=EditorF|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Template:Z160 MrOllie (talk) 03:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi MrOllie, I appreciate your concerns regarding my edits and keep wikipedia relevant. This is collaborative community and we are helping each other to learn for betterment of Wikipedia. You seems very dedicated to keep it true with your understandings but I want to let your know that as explained previously I am just here to help Education related articles . My objective is to help youths for choosing right career . I am a new editor and searching new topics which interests me. I am not Paid editor . This I am doing it voluntarily. I hope this helps . EditorF (talk) 08:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ignite India Education
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ignite India Education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 17:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ignite india education
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ignite india education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 21:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 21:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EditorF, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
MrOllie (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:EditorF/Ignite India Education
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:EditorF/Ignite India Education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 22:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ignite India Education (July 12)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:EditorF/Ignite India Education and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:EditorF/Ignite India Education, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, EditorF!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 22:57, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
|
Blocked for sockpuppetry
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EditorF. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC) |
EditorF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here i understood this now and will follow the same please unblock me EditorF (talk) 09:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
==
EditorF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[User:EditorF|EditorF]] ([[User talk:EditorF#top|talk]]) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:EditorF|EditorF]] ([[User talk:EditorF#top|talk]]) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:EditorF|EditorF]] ([[User talk:EditorF#top|talk]]) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
==
EditorF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am writing this unblock request because - 1. the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. 2. the block is no longer necessary because I understood reason why I have been blocked . 3. I understand that I have been blocked for using multiple accounts which I was not aware not to use .
I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, I will make sure that I make useful contributions to wikipedia . EditorF (talk) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here : I am writing this unblock request because - 1. the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. 2. the block is no longer necessary because I understood reason why I have been blocked . 3. I understand that I have been blocked for using multiple accounts which I was not aware not to use . I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, I will make sure that I make useful contributions to wikipedia . [[User:EditorF|EditorF]] ([[User talk:EditorF#top|talk]]) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here : I am writing this unblock request because - 1. the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. 2. the block is no longer necessary because I understood reason why I have been blocked . 3. I understand that I have been blocked for using multiple accounts which I was not aware not to use . I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, I will make sure that I make useful contributions to wikipedia . [[User:EditorF|EditorF]] ([[User talk:EditorF#top|talk]]) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here : I am writing this unblock request because - 1. the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. 2. the block is no longer necessary because I understood reason why I have been blocked . 3. I understand that I have been blocked for using multiple accounts which I was not aware not to use . I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, I will make sure that I make useful contributions to wikipedia . [[User:EditorF|EditorF]] ([[User talk:EditorF#top|talk]]) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}