Talk:Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:43, 20 August 2020

India Start‑class High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Law C‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 16 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved per consensus and policy. Tiggerjay (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC) Tiggerjay (talk) 19:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(non-admin closure)

Hindu Marriage Act → Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – year is an integral part of name, hence requesting redirect -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:45, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose there is no need for unnecessary disambiguation sst ✈ 02:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation SSTflyer? I asked for full name not disambig. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:16, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:COMMONNAME. sst ✈ 04:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Per MOS:LAW, titles of legal articles are formatted according to the citation convention of that law's jurisdiction. In India, it appears the proper title is "The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955" (with the word "The" in front). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Please do not erase data on this page

--A2c1 (talk) 09:21, 12 August 2020 (UTC) An unknown user 2a00:23c6:1482:a100:4811:49f8:7fb7:272a has been deleting information & data in this page. Please don't erase information or data on this page. This page needs much more aditions — Preceding unsigned comment added by A2c1 (talk • contribs) 03:55, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not how it works. If you include a, quite honestly, barely coherent list of blatant opinions, then yes, it should be deleted. Nothing is fully deleted on Wikipedia so your edits will remain in the page history, but the section you included should not be part of the article. Whether it has links or not is not the same as whether it has reasonable sources. Harsimaja (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--A2c1 (talk) 17:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not denied that the language may not have complied to a feeling of "impartiality", however this article itself is an incorrect representation of the ground realities. The way this reads, is not correct as it happens on ground. The links that I shared were authentic. How does one add correct information with a request "please feel free to edit, but not eliminate"

Thank You very much --A2c1 (talk) 17:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 That’s not how it works. If you include a, quite honestly, barely coherent list of blatant opinions, then yes, it should be deleted. Nothing is fully deleted on Wikipedia so your edits will remain in the page history, but the section you included should not be part of the article. Whether it has links or not is not the same as whether it has reasonable sources.  [[User:Harsimaja|Harsimaja]] ([[User talk:Harsimaja|talk]]) 15:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
+--[[User:A2c1|A2c1]] ([[User talk:A2c1|talk]]) 17:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
+I have not denied that the language may not have complied to a feeling of "impartiality", however this article itself is an incorrect representation of the ground realities. The way this reads, is not correct as it happens on ground.
+The links that I shared were authentic. How does one add correct information with a request "please feel free to edit, but not eliminate"
+Thank You very much --[[User:A2c1|A2c1]] ([[User talk:A2c1|talk]]) 17:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)