User talk:JavaHurricane: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:26, 24 August 2020

This is JavaHurricane's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Break

So, as it must happen, my laptop has not been working for a few days due to a power issue, limiting me to my mobile. And shortly after my !votes on those RfAs, my mobile also broke down. So, I will be away for an extended period of time until the lockdown ends and I fix my devices. For those who are wondering how I am able to contact you, this is my mother's mobile, which I use scarcely. Please don't mark me as a Missing Wikipedian, I'll return once the lockdown ends. Have a good day!

I'm sorry about that. Hope you get your mobiles and device fixed! I wish to see you back on Wikipedia soon. How long do you think it'll take? Best of wishes, and stay safe! Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 08:41, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eumat114, my computer is fixed, so I am back! Java Hurricane 14:28, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Prahlad balaji

Hello, JavaHurricane. You have new messages at Prahlad balaji's talk page.
Message added 17:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lenham-Hurst GTR

Dear sir, thanks for the promt reply regarding my article about my car, I understad that you was requesting (RS) reliable sources ( fully understandable ) . #1 Concerning technical data on the car , I presume present owner (my self) and registration certificate would be considered as RS.

2 Regarding history and the story about this unik car, would I ref. A, an article in https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/archive/article/june-1996/54/no-lemon-lenham where my car was described

B When I made investigation about the background of my car I was able to locate a fellow who actually worked on the Lenham factory when my car was manufactured !His name is Mr Allan Hebb and his mail are (redacted) . He been very helfull to me, and can sure confirm my statements. Best regards Tom Karlsson Vastervik Sweden — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom in Vastervik (talk • contribs) 17:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tom in Vastervik, first point: NEVER share personal information about others (like emails). Such things are strictly prohibited. Second point: your car isn't notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia since your car isn't mentioned in reliable sources independent of the subject. Java Hurricane 03:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, so sorry abt my mistake , did not understand how "public" this chat was in fact, I'm new on Wikipedia and not that familiar with the language. Please note that this car is a part of British sportcar history, it's only builded in one example and not known to the public, it bin hidden away for more than 40 years, and now has my renovation of the car created curiosity in the motorworld , several magazine has asked to make reportage , and linked to this Wikipedia could be very helpful to get the fact's right. I personally love to check Wikipedia for fact's about odd items. So my humble question to you to reconsider your decision not to public an atricle in Wicipedia. Best Regards Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom in Vastervik (talk • contribs) 10:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Category 2 Atlantic hurricanes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Category 2 Atlantic hurricanes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 08:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Willbb234, please move it back. I'm working on it at the moment. Java Hurricane 08:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've even put the in use tag on it. Java Hurricane 08:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can work on the article in draftspace. Empty articles shouldn't be in mainspace. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 08:40, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Willbb234, I tagged the page for G7 as I discovered a better version in someone's sandbox. Java Hurricane 09:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Jai Madaan

Dear,

My page was deleted on 10th April 2020, seek your assistance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rinkusharma8926 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Masked and Anonymous screenplay credits

On the Larry Charles page, it incorrectly attributes to him a pseudonym that Bob Dylan used and vice versa, names they chose for screenplay credits on Masked and Anonymous. I know this because while watching the Blu-ray of the film, Larry states in an interview extra who used what name. I corrected the page but received a note from you stating "it did not appear constructive." If correcting false information is no longer constructive for your site, I'll make sure not to bother next time. 172.90.84.211 (talk) 08:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please cite some reliable sources to support the information the next time! Java Hurricane 08:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:172.90.84.211

You may want to use Twinkle to notify IP users next time. Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 08:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes. Thanks! Java Hurricane 09:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bilbo Baggins GA1

Hi JavaHurricane, I hope your laptop problems are resolved! I think I've attended to all the issues on this GA but let me know if there's anything else I can do. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:24, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chiswick Chap, sorry for forgetting to pass it! I'll do it right away. Java Hurricane 08:25, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing my edits

Hello, Re this message Hello, I'm JavaHurricane. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Convoy PQ 17—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. JavaHurricane 16:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

my contribution was very constructive as it removed inaccuracies about the designation of German ships. On what basis do you say it was not constructive?

Regards, The Old Chronicler 3rd June, 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ye Olde Chronicler (talk • contribs) 17:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ye Olde Chronicler, the content was unsourced. Please provide sources while adding material. Java Hurricane 07:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article declined

Hamilton Azzurri article - Hi my page was declined. i was wondering if I could get feedback on which soruces were not reliable. Was it all sources or just some? This will assist in editing the article further.

kind regards Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimavich (talk • contribs) 02:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two Trees of Valinor

Gosh, I had no idea you would be bringing Middle-earth articles to AfD. This one is mentioned in over 100 scholarly journal articles so I'd not have imagined its notability to be in any doubt, though I see it isn't currently at all well-written. I will add some citations this afternoon. If you are thinking of taking any others to AfD I'd be awfully glad if you'd discuss it with me first as we are down to a pretty hard core of essential topics now - dozens (if not hundreds) have been merged, deleted, or rewritten and brought to GA status in the past six months. Dickerson calls the Two Trees "the most important mythic symbols in all of the legendarium", already cited in the article, so you may guess my opinion on its value. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chiswick Chap, okay tagging for G7 now. Java Hurricane 12:30, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, I didn't know I could delete articles I created. I thought I still had to go through AfD. Thanks, cookie monster (2020) 755 17:24, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CookieMonster755, you can. See WP:CSD#G7 for details. Java Hurricane 10:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Message from AAWWKWTH

hi, why i cant edit the page of Fenwick pier, thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAWWKWTH (talk • contribs) 04:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AAWWKWTH, your edits do not cite sources and seem to be original research. As a result of Wikipedia's policies, I must remove the original research. Please cite a source (see our sourcing guideline for help) while readding the information. Thank you! Java Hurricane 04:43, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: I am still editing and adding the citation. pl inform me if any missing sources before u delete my editing. thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by AAWWKWTH (talk • contribs) 04:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Lawrenceleejr

Hi! I see that you just rejected my draft here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Samson_Chukwu

Thank you very much for the review. This is my first time publishing new articles, and I don't quite understand how the references don't meet the general nobility guidelines. References 7-10 are from two different large news sources in Switzerland and those pieces are entirely about Chukwu. This does seem exactly like significant coverage and certainly not in-passing mentions. In each of these references and others, he is the "main topic of the source material" as required in the definition of "significant coverage."

And his is one of the more prominent names displayed at modern Swiss protests, again as referenced. Can you give me a feeling of what would qualify as significant? Thanks!

--Lawrenceleejr (talk) 14:04, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrenceleejr, hello! Sorry for the late reply. The sources mentioned do not contribute towards notability as they are "run of the mill" sources which do not provide why the subject was notable. Java Hurricane 06:52, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harassment

"A common problem is harassment in userspace. Examples include placing numerous false or questionable "warnings" on a user's talk page, restoring such comments after a user has removed them, placing "suspected sockpuppet" and similar tags on the user page of active contributors, and otherwise trying to display material the user may find annoying or embarrassing in their user space. User pages are provided so that editors can provide some general information about themselves and user talk pages are to facilitate communication. Neither is intended as a 'wall of shame' and should not be used to display supposed problems with the user unless the account has been blocked as a result of those issues."

I want to remind you that I am an editor in good faith and I would appreciate it if you would stop going through each of my edits. I would ask that you kindly undo the edit that you made on the page Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms, which was done without a discussion and implied that I acted in bad faith. Please stop harassing me.SeedEWound (talk) 16:43, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SeedEWound, I am sorry if you feel I am harassing you. However, the warnings aren't questionable (sorry for restoring them though, but they shouldn't be called as harassment). Further, the reversion on the aforementioned page was made due to a lack of consensus, which is necessary for this change. You can feel free to revert the change if and only if a consensus exists. However, I am sorry for being too harsh with you! These are testing times and I am often stressed out. Again, sorry! Java Hurricane 01:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Radhikabai.

Hello Java Hurricane. I got your message warning to block me. Are you some administrator appointed by wikipedia? And what exactly are you threatening me for? Removing information about a person who never existed? The page spreads false information about a certain 'Radhikabai" who never existed. Remove that info asap.

Hello! As I noted, I also believe that the page is unreliable and likely false. However, it is not possible to outright delete information here; we have a procedure to do so. See this policy as to how to nominate a page for deletion. A community discussion will follow for seven days, at the end of which someone will take the appropriate actions as per the consensus gathered there.

As to whether I am an admin, no I am not; however, I found it fit to warn you of the consequences of removing material without consensus; warning a user is allowed by policy. Please do not take it as threat as much as a reminder of sorts.

Finally, whenever starting a new topic on a talk page, please click on "new section" at the top of the page. On writing a message or a reply, remember to sign your message with four tildes as follows~~~~.

Thank you, and have a great day! Java Hurricane 12:08, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you dont have the authority to block a user? Has someone entrusted you with the authority to go around 'warning' people? Is that a part of your job?

When might the Radhikabai page get deleted?

Hello JavaHurricane! Where are we on the deletion of the Radhikabai wikipedia page? Please reply 15 june 2020 The page should be deleted by 19th if the community is supportive. You can leave your comments on the page. Java Hurricane 03:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Lee Wendell

I am Barry Lee Wendell . I put my own name in yesterday and today as the first openly gay City Councilor in Morgantown, West Virginia. What do I have to do to have someone not immediately edit that out?

˜˜˜˜Barry Lee Wendell (dovelizer)

Dovelizer, hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunately, due to our policy that our articles must be neutral and unbiased, we dissuade users from editing their own biographies or any other subjects with which they may have a conflict of interest. You may instead make a edit request on the talk page asking for the given edits. Further, that page contains a list of mayors who are notable by Wikipedia's standards. Since you don't seem to be notable by these standards (i.e. lack an article) your name unfortunately cannot be included there. If you think you meet Wikipedia's notability standards, you could start an autobiography (though this is highly dissuaded) in the draft namespace or put up a request for the page. Finally, remember to sign your messages with four tildes as follows: ~~~~.

Thank you and have a good day! Stay safe~

Java Hurricane 03:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Vijaydurg

I have really lost all hopes from Wikipedia today. You guys have simply reversed the changed I made to the Battle of Vijaydurg page. I have invested my time to ensure that only authentic information is added to that page and you cant simply undo that! That too without reading anything! I have lost all hopes from wikipedia today! last time I spend my time here.. and will spread this experience to hundreds of people as well

You guys allow people to spread false info in the first place while people like me who try to spread correct information get blocked! Great going wikipedia!!! best wishes on your venture of safeguarding false information!

only my actions were reversed and the people who wrote that incorrect information in the first place were safeguarded! you have a failed system in place

Please stop your personal attacks Awardy. As I said, the information was sourced and can only be removed by a community discussion on the talk page. Java Hurricane 06:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am talking about the Battle of Vijaydurg page. Some edits were made by me. but you went ahead and reversed it without giving any reason.

If only you guys paid such minute attention to the people spreading wrong info in the first place

I was talking about the same thing. Java Hurricane 06:49, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no talk page there! the people who edited that page before me have done no such discussions! You havent reversed them, why did you just reverse my edits?

Because what you removed was sourced content. People were adding to the page, you were unilaterally removing sourced content without a discussion. Consensus is required for mass changes. Java Hurricane 06:54, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.. but that content was incorrect. Where can we have a discussion about this?

Eastern Anatolia Region

Please have a close look of your reverts, had not been very constructive to be honest... the ip user has been reported to ARV and EW. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CommanderWaterford, I reverted my rollback because it was a content dispute and not vandalism. Java Hurricane 16:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of edits to Barack Obama Day

Hello, Java. You recently notified me of a revert to changes made to Barack Obama Day. If you would review my changes they were to revert the page to the prior version before internet activists edited the page today. The version you reverted to is factually inaccurate and does not represent accurate information as it still portrays the day as June 14th, which it is NOT despite the desires of Twitter mobs. As stated clearly and extensively in all cited references and sources, the day is actually on August 4th and only recognized by Illinois (and separately by a single county in Alabama). Twitter does not represent any governing body and their decision to recognize today as Barack Obama Day does not constitute a legal change in the date the day is recognized and should not be conveyed through Wikipedia. Abuse by anonymous parties to edit the page and alter the date are serving only to justify misinformation being distributed on other platforms and create a false narrative. This behavior must be prevented as it is imperative that Wikipedia and articles contained herein be diligently maintained as accurate to the best of the maintainer's abilities. Thetrentharvey (talk) 04:54, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thetrentharvey, actually the information on that page was sourced, and you removed sourced content. You could raise an issue on the talk page regarding verifiability though. Java Hurricane 05:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miraheze

Hello,

For security reasons, could you please confirm this is you.

Thanks,

~ RhinosF1_(Chat) / ^(Contribs)

Consul, PublicTestWiki

14:42, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

RhinosF1, that is me. Java Hurricane 14:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for confirming. ~ RhinosF1_(Chat) / ^(Contribs) 14:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi JavaHurricane. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barkeep49, thank you! Java Hurricane 16:56, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2019 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1

JavaHurricane, you opened this review on May 19 and last posted to it a month ago on May 24, though the actual review itself hasn't started on the page. Do you plan on doing this review soon, or should it be put back into the pool of unreviewed nominations for a new reviewer to take on? Please let me know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BlueMoonset, yes I do mean to do it. I'm doing it right now. Java Hurricane 02:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nikhil Anand

Hey Java! I submitted a draft page of Nikhil Anand and it was declined by you as it seemed to be promotional. Taking the review from experienced wikipedia editors I made the necessary changes. I request you to kindly look at the changes I made and I have re-submitted. If some small changes are required then please do the same and help me publish the page. I believe that the person has enough presence and has worked enough to be on wikipedia so that the information can reach more people.Richardmat (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Java! I have made necessary changes to the draft as suggested by you. I hope it is in a neutral tone now. If you still feel some changes are needed, it will be kind of you if you can do the needful. Richardmat (talk) 22:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology standard

Hi JavaHurricane,

Thanks for reverting my edit. Can you please clarify the standard for writing the etymology or reference where to find it, or should I look at this article for reference? It's a worthwhile effort to be consistent which is what I tried to do. Thanks again. Thraex64 (talk) 09:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Normally we don't use articles in the etymology. You can see that in most language articles. Java Hurricane 09:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understood and thank you for the quick reply, but is it not unnecessarily ambiguous this way or am I seeing things? Thraex64 (talk) 10:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't find it ambiguous. Further, it is the established consensus on the style, so I think it is best to stick to it. Java Hurricane 10:45, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote

Dear JavaHurricane,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ATK Mohun Bagan F.C.

Please leave the redirect alone. We should only deal with the quandary (merge/move/whatever) if the AFD results in a 'keep'. For now having 2 identical article is subpar, and we cannot blank and redirect the one being debated at AFD, so this is the only solution. Giant Snowman 16:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Rich

Why you delete edit I put references — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musiceurope15 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Things happen sometimes... Randompointofview (talk) 03:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arturo Arias (engineer)

Hello, I am new to wikipedia in English. I wanted to ask you what elements of the writing of Arturo Arias (engineer) could make you doubt the neutrality of the article. And also if you could give me any suggestion on how to fix. --Carrilano (talk) 04:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I ask you the above, because if you click some of the article references (such as: BBC) I think you will notice that it is quite sober.--Carrilano (talk) 04:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carrilano, hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. I came across your page though the new page patrol. I found several points in the page that I found to be non-neutral. For example, describing the scientist as "outstanding" in the lead (summary), "which would give life to [...]", "most reliable", etc. all suggests a slight POV. These need to be resolved by using more neutral words. I have removed the "outstanding"; other improvements could be removing the "most reliable" and changing the "which...to" to "which was the progenitor of". Hope this helps! Java Hurricane 04:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. It was not my intention to flatter the person. I think maybe my English played against me in writing. I will try to improve it.--Carrilano (talk) 04:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carrilano, no problems! Best of luck, and stay safe. Java Hurricane 04:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to improve the article a bit. I think it was necessary to use quotation marks when it comes to what is the "most reliable instrumental measure". I look forward to any new suggestions. And grateful for the above suggestions. Thanks again!--Carrilano (talk) 15:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bishopdale Page

Hi there

I updated the Bishopdale, Christchurch page yesterday and see that you have reverted it back to its previous version. Can I ask why?

Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by BishopdaleCT (talk • contribs) 21:47, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BishopdaleCT, hello! Welcome to Wikipedia.

Firstly your username is contrary to policy as it represents a group of people (here a location) rather than a single person. Wikipedia's policies prohibit role accounts - an account must represent only one person.

Secondly, the changes made on the page were not appropriately cited and were original research, which is banned from the English Wikipedia due to concerns of verifiability. Please cite a source the next time. Thank you! Java Hurricane 02:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for completing 3 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias ^talk 08:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template Infobox Person For Just Experience for sometime not for permanant.and someone added db. and there is wikipediansl template is here on my page already.

Template Infobox Person For Just Experience for sometime not for permanant.and someone added db. and there is wikipediansl template is here on my page already. Rakesh Kru. Joshi (talk) 11:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rakesh Kru. Joshi, Wikipedia is not a platform for webhosting or advertising. Java Hurricane 11:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope you don't mind me replying here JavaHurricane. I wanted to let you know this user has been spamming promotional articles about a non notable person crosswiki for some time. And for that reason the account is now locked by a steward. --Wiki13 (talk) 11:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki13, thanks for the update! Java Hurricane 11:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DataSpii

Hi there. I recently submitted a topic that was front page of the Washington Post, and other leading publications, front and center. What's wrong with my references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cory Gordon (talk • contribs) 03:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cory Gordon, you haven't properly cited your sources. See referencing for beginners for help. Java Hurricane 04:05, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further, the draft in its current state is largely unreferenced and does not pass the general notability guideline. Java Hurricane 04:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion of my user page

Can you give back my user page and refrain from editing it thanks.

Also why in the Earth are these messages in the user talk page User_talk:DaltoReborn. This is crazy. You should just stop. // B. Macho^✉ 08:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

B.macho, the page which I requested for speedy deletion was pure vandalism created by vandal account and only contained an audio file of a human fart. Java Hurricane 08:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References fixed

Hi can you have a look at the page before I resubmit it for the review. I have fixed the references and small errors. Individual published coverage of the subject is available now and they do show significant coverage and not just a passing mentions about the subject.Gimme a feedback.

Thanks ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mudasir_Zafar )

Fanmeeting and Muster

hello :)

Fanmeeting and Muster is the same thing they're both fanclub events with the difference that one takes place (mostly) in Japan and the other South Korea. However currently on BTS page some Fanmeeting are listed under Concerts and others are listed under Fan meeting tours which makes no sense. An example of that is Japan Official Fan Meeting Vol.1 being under Concerts however Japan Official Fan Meeting Vol.2 –Undercover Mission– and the following Fan Meetings are under Fan meeting tours. To correct this mistake I tried to change the title of Fan meeting tours to Fanmeeting & Muster (nowadays Fanmeeting gets written together) and list all Fanmeeting and Musters under Fan meeting Tours (Fanmeeting & Muster) since they're both fanclub events that go with the same theme/songs every year they take place. Also I've just noticed all of BTS Japan perfomances I've added got removed. Bts has released a new album called Map of the Soul 7 : The Journey and for that has been performing their new songs on various TV Shows in Japan. I added all those perfomances to BTS page since they were missing before. Please change back what you've changed it wasn't correct before. Fairyjimin (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Threaten me...

Do you have to Delete What I have done??? Don't do it please. If you do, I will become VERY angry...In fact, I could switch from happy to very angry very quickly.--THE COLOSSAL GALAXY NAMED IC1101 (talk) 04:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

THE COLOSSAL GALAXY NAMED IC1101, please don't make threats. Java Hurricane 04:54, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What i'm saying is true...--THE COLOSSAL GALAXY NAMED IC1101 (talk) 04:56, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing better to do, what's going on here? I know JH said on IRC/Discord (their wikiproject-related channel and server respectively are linked) that there were threats, but do specify please. ~ AC5230 talk 05:01, 27 July 2020 (UTC) (1:01 AM Eastern Daylight Time)[reply]

I am just testing... Stop this.. --THE COLOSSAL GALAXY NAMED IC1101 (talk) 05:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:THE COLLASAL GALAXY NAMED IC1101/sandbox would be YOUR OWN PERSONAL testing place. If it doesn't exist, create it, and go ham! Don't break anything. ~ AC5230 talk 05:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

undelete Lumbini Eye Institute

Could you please undelete the Lumbini Eye Institute. I am not sure why you did not start discussion before delteting. nirmal (talk) 06:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Maybe because there was already a discussion and this was the third deletion of the article. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war support for Patrick Deneen (author)

Thank you for your help with the edit warring on Patrick_Deneen_(author). I have reported the user. Prauls901 (talk) 14:06, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prauls901, no problems! It is a pleasure to help. Java Hurricane 14:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "Joy Bridenbaker" article.

Why did "Joy Bridenbaker" get deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manhattan, NYC. (talk • contribs) 03:00, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manhattan, NYC., it was unambiguous advertising and met the speedy deletion criterion G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion). Java Hurricane 03:05, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JavaHurricane,

The article "Joy Bridenbaker" was not written for the purpose of advertising or promotion.

Bridenbaker is a notable Canadian performance artist with solid credits in several independant art house films and an appearance along side Al Pacino in "Hunters" (2020).

There is link to her IMDB within the article.

The article looked good to me other than the few resource citations not properly embedded and was a good read and addition to Wikipedia in my opinion.

Would you refurbish the article to the drafts section, and if not perhaps publish as a "Stub"?

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Yours very truly,

Manhattan, NYC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manhattan, NYC. (talk • contribs) 03:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I cannot republish that article as I am not an administrator. Additionally, the page in the state it was deleted constituted unambiguous advertising and Wikipedia is not a platform for posting content that amounts to blatant promotion or advertising. Finally, notability on Wikipedia is determined by the coverage of the subject in third-party reliable sources and "solid credits" in multiple films is normally not used as a notability criterion, unless the subject has been in multiple such notable films. The subject of the article in discussion did not seem to meet the notability guideline for actors, but that is irrelevant in any case as it met the criteria for speedy deletion. Java Hurricane 03:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

100 Deeds for Eddie McDowd

added a link pointing to Samoyed

Vítor Tormena

added a link pointing to UOL

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 100 Deeds for Eddie McDowd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samoyed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reason of rejection

Hello

Thanks for reviewing the first page I create on Wikipedia, Wencke Synak.

However, I have a small question about the reason of rejection.

The German actress shows significant coverage being featured in IMDB, Amazon Prime Video, Spotify, Deezer & Cast Upload. This criteria is then fully met!

Moreover, you can look for example in the category of german actresses and you'll find that dozens of actresses with lower number of reliable references have their pages published without any note even.

Please, reconsider reviewing the page and tell me you point of view about what I said.

Kind regards RobertLasper (talk) 11:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asked and answered at the teahouse - Special:Permalink/973468458#Reason of rejection (Wencke Synak). Cabayi (talk) 11:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hey, so overall you've done good work, but I did want to follow up on a few things that I noticed. One relatively minor thing is that it's recommended for new page reviewers to add relevant WikiProject tags to articles upon review. If you haven't installed it already, WP:RATER makes this quite easy. Additionally, I came across two cases of articles that should have been moved during review: Akhal Pulwama and 12 Koofi. Moving articles to the correct WP:COMMONNAME is part of the review process; for Akhal Pulwama I think that moving it to Akhal, Pulwama is unambiguously the correct action, so I went ahead and did that myself while looking over your work. For 12 Koofi, I wasn't able to track down the sources cited, so it's less clear to me, although the fact that the lead says that it's more commonly known as Reer Marka would suggest that Reer Marka should be the title.

Let me know if you have any questions, and keep up the good work. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, thank you! Java Hurricane 01:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Semyonov's Rebellion

JavaHurricane,

Firstly, I appreciate the work you're doing reviewing Wikipedia pages. Judging by your talk page, it's often a thankless job. Personally, I much prefer writing articles, but someone has to review them! So, thanks. Secondly, I wanted to ask if you could answer some of the questions I left on Semyonov's Rebellion's talk page. I would appreciate the clarification. To summarize them - I was responding to an article creation request from the Russia WikiProject. Does that automatically guarantee that the article is worth publishing? Finally, I did update the article with more sources, including #4, a book focusing on G. M. Semyonov and his contemporaries. It's my hope that that will establish notoriety. Best wishes, Ph03n1x77 (talk) 04:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ph03n1x77, hey! I've had a look at the draft and have done a bit of copyediting. I'm not an expert at old Russian topics, so I'll leave the reviewing this time to someone else, but I think the draft looks good now. Java Hurricane 05:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi JavaHurricane,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

MV Henna Picture Edit

Hello, I had noticed my picture that I had posted onto the MV Henna page has been removed due to "promotion". I can understand how you could believe that my tag of "adding a higher quality picture" could be under that decision from your stand point, but the reason for me adding a new picture was due to the previous image used was from 2010 and was in a lower resolution so I thought it would be a better idea to add a newer picture to the page just so it would look nicer. My intent wasn't to promote any pages of mine as I do not do that on Wikipedia. I just simply posted a picture onto the page for it to look nicer to anybody wanting to look at the history of the ship. I just want to inform you of my intent as I don't want to revert it back and start an "editing war" and in the end I'd hope that we are both on good terms. Kind Regards, EMPhoto+Film (talk) 06:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EMPhoto+Film, thank you for leaving this message. I thought after seeing your username that you were promoting a company as your username seems to be the name of a company. Could you explain what your username means? Java Hurricane 07:21, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sorry for the late reply as I have been busy since I left the original post. The meaning is just my Initials for "EM" and then "Photo+Film" is just what I have interests in. If I wanted to have affiliated it with my official brand I would've named it that and it would've been obvious. Kind Regards, EMPhoto+Film (talk) 08:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EMPhoto+Film, ah that clears the confusion up. The username policy prohibits promotional/group/company usernames, hence I asked. Thanks for your message, and sorry for reverting your edits! Feel free to restore them. Java Hurricane 08:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thank you so much and I am glad that we are both on good terms. I shall revert the changes and I understand the confusion. Kind Regards, EMPhoto+Film (talk) 08:57, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About significant coverage of Aspose.BarCode in multiple reliable independent secondary sources

If we formally try to find information about Aspose.Barcode in secondary sources which is fully independent from company in any cases we can find this list:

What we can see by observing these sources? These sources show that Aspose.Barcode is a winner of reader choice of VS magazine in 2017, it can generate and recognize QR and are used in different projects as barcode generation and recognition engine. But this information is restricted and describes almost nothing about the library.

In this way we can look into the sources which is used as references in the article and could be considered as primary dependent sources:

This is independent sources which in some parameters could look like primary, but if we read this Wikipedia article, secondary sources do not mean uninvolved and can be counted as secondary if they just making some problem review or meta-analysis. As we see, these articles describe raw technical parameters of the library, which quickly can be checked.

Yes some review articles, which is used as sources, use some peacock terms. But all information which is not related with easily checked technical facts, are removed from Wikipedia article. And we can see that Aspose.Barcode definitely can add generation and recognition features to Java/.NET/C++/PHP and other programming languages with selected barcode types like QR/Code 39/Code 128 and others. Also history of library development are can be checked by wayback machine and published articles.

In this way we can count these sources as self-review secondary technical sources about the programming library. And as we see this way is used in Wikipedia if we watch sources about the Tesseract recognition engine. As it is written in this article: Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy

All references in Supported barcode types isn’t related with Aspose.Barcode but related with barcode types which currently aren’t described in Wikipedia (I am working on addition of these types information) but supported by the library. I could delete this information, because it relates with the subject too superficially (with library abilities, but not library description).Alexandr.gavriluk (talk) 20:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 205: / Line 205: @@
 Hey [[User:JavaHurricane| <span style = "color:green">Java</span>]]! I submitted a draft page of Nikhil Anand and it was declined by you as it seemed to be promotional. Taking the review from experienced wikipedia editors I made the necessary changes. I request you to kindly look at the changes I made and I have re-submitted. If some small changes are required then please do the same and help me publish the page. I believe that the person has enough presence and has worked enough to be on wikipedia so that the information can reach more people.[[User:Richardmat|Richardmat]] ([[User talk:Richardmat|talk]]) 14:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
+Hey [[User:JavaHurricane| <span style = "color:green">Java</span>]]! I have made necessary changes to the draft as suggested by you. I hope it is in a neutral tone now. If you still feel some changes are needed, it will be kind of you if you can do the needful. [[User:Richardmat|Richardmat]] ([[User talk:Richardmat|talk]]) 22:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 == Etymology standard ==