Thanks for uploading Image:Brockf5.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Plexcolaps.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Bshow7.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:Brock01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brock01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:01shelb.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:05ovw.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:28cell.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Brockpress.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:10am.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Please stop changing the Gorilla Press image on Professional wrestling holds. The one currently used it sufficent and smaller, and the one you keep changing it to - Image:brockpress.jpg - is incorrectly tagged and will be deleted soon if that's not changed.-- bd (talk to me) (watch me) 21:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image tagging for Image:29raise.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:29raise.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Stop removing info from the article. SteveLamacq43 11:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SteveLamacq43 12:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image tagging for Image:Brockview.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brockview.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Bigf-5.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Brockwin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Brock2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Brock Lesnar
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BertieBasset 20:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
License tagging for Image:Stretching-crew.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stretching-crew.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Brock Lesnar
I've reverted all your edits again. Please desist unless you plan to edit constructively. Your images are unsourced, you are removing citations for less reliable websites and adding unnecessary and poorly written information.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SteveLamacq43 17:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 22:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image copyright problem with Image:Lesnar-wrestling.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lesnar-wrestling.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:F5chair.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Image:F5chair.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:F5chair.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ↪Lakes(Talk) 10:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No personal attacks
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Brock Lesnar
I dont believe all your edits on that page (ans others) are worng but you are breaking referencing and other formatting aspects while removing and badly replacing information... if you maybe decided to talk through your edits instead of reverting and sending personal attack then maybe aspects of your changes could be implemented into the article... if not you will most likely be blocked again --- Paulley
I don't know how many times you can be warned, but you refuse to listen: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BertieBasset 16:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to John Cena (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 07:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 17:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How can you come back from a ban and do exactly the same thing for which you were banned in the first place?! This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BertieBasset 12:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Due to continual disruption of articles with no attempt to communicate with other editors, this account has been indefinitely blocked. --Sam Blanning(talk) 17:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove recent warnings
You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the help desk. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here How to archive a talk page. Thank you. --Brad Beattie(talk) 16:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was blocked beacuse somebody did not like my edit on a page which is ok with me but i did not know that until know before i had never even clicked on my page i didnt know anything just to edit and therefore i got blocked for not communicating with other users which like i said i didnt know how to but i see all that know and i am willing to improve and communicate with users and improve my editing skills. i am just asking for another chance and i will improve thanks.
Notes:
In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked beacuse somebody did not like my edit on a page which is ok with me but i did not know that until know before i had never even clicked on my page i didnt know anything just to edit and therefore i got blocked for not communicating with other users which like i said i didnt know how to but i see all that know and i am willing to improve and communicate with users and improve my editing skills. i am just asking for another chance and i will improve thanks. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked beacuse somebody did not like my edit on a page which is ok with me but i did not know that until know before i had never even clicked on my page i didnt know anything just to edit and therefore i got blocked for not communicating with other users which like i said i didnt know how to but i see all that know and i am willing to improve and communicate with users and improve my editing skills. i am just asking for another chance and i will improve thanks. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked beacuse somebody did not like my edit on a page which is ok with me but i did not know that until know before i had never even clicked on my page i didnt know anything just to edit and therefore i got blocked for not communicating with other users which like i said i didnt know how to but i see all that know and i am willing to improve and communicate with users and improve my editing skills. i am just asking for another chance and i will improve thanks. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they were placed here because other editors have noticed an issue with your behaviour that may require improvement. They are a method of communication and user talk pages stand as a record of communication with you. If you do not believe the warning was valid or have a question about improving your behaviour you can respond here or visit the help desk. If your talk page is becoming long, you can archive it in accordance with the guidelines laid out here How to archive a talk page. Thank you. --Brad Beattie (talk) 16:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
