Jump to content

Talk:Veganism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Juroreight (talk | contribs) at 11:24, 26 February 2021 (→‎Note re Equality Act 2010 in the UK). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Former good articleVeganism was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 18, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 14, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 20, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Delisted good article

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hlc63 (article contribs).

Restructuring and moving nutrition information to Vegan nutrition

This article's section Vegan diet has roughly two parts: sections 1-4 treat what vegans eat, and sections 5-8 treat nutritional (meaning health) aspects. I propose two amendments: 1) Separate sections 5-8 into a "Health aspects" or "Nutrition" section 2) Shorten the content and move most discussion to Vegan nutrition, which covers the same aspects but is less extensive in some areas, e.g. dietetic association evaluations. Do other users agree?

Note re Equality Act 2010 in the UK

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Veganism&oldid=1009037724 fixes a misstatement of the law. Ethical veganism isn't a listed protected characteristic in EA2010 (for that matter, neither are "gender" nor "ethnicity", it's "sex" and "race") but it was found by the ruling cited in the article to qualify for protection as a belief under the "religion or belief" protected characteristic. The judge's wording at the end of the ruling is misleading. Juroreight (talk) 11:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]