Jump to content

User talk:JudeJnr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JudeJnr (talk | contribs) at 12:50, 8 March 2021 (→March 2021). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

JudeJnr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi JudeJnr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

You welcome, I just went in. It such an amazing community. In 4 minutes scrolling through the page. I learnt something new.--JudeJnr (talk) 17:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oxlade (singer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oxlade (singer). Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GoingBatty, I have taken it off the lead and made adjustment.--JudeJnr (talk) 21:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good call. There's a lot more to do to get rid of poorly sourced material. Reviewers can only advise. We want to accept drafts, though sometimes it may not feel that way Fiddle Faddle 22:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timtrent, I have gotten rid of a lot of materials and have made adjustments to fit in NPOV.--JudeJnr (talk) 04:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys, I hoping you guys could help improve Draft:Phatblitz and advice me on what else is needed SkyNetGang (talk) 11:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops here is the accurate link https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Phatblitz please help me anyway you guys can. Thanks in advance. SkyNetGang (talk) 11:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oxlade (singer) (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is a well disguised advert. The referneicning sacrifices quality for quantity. It is WP:BOMBARD If it can be rescued, so be it, but adverts have no place on Wikipedia.

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Get rid of the concert adverts and any references that are equally trivial.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 10:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oxlade (singer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oxlade (singer). Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 22:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timtrent, I have taken off notable performances section and over sourced articles with just mention.--JudeJnr (talk) 22:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Oxlade (singer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Oxlade (singer). Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 07:00, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Timtrent, I have attended to it and left a message on the talk page.--JudeJnr (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Your Number (Ayo Jay song) has been accepted

Your Number (Ayo Jay song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noah!💬 18:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You welcome NoahDavid771, can you also review this draft's Oxlade (singer), I have made all adjustment as commented on the draft.--JudeJnr (talk) 13:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi JudeJnr! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I just submitted my first draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oxlade (singer) (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The subject of the article isn’t notable just yet.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Celestina007 (talk) 10:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Information icon Hello, JudeJnr, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 22:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007; this is unjust. Firstly you declined the article as WP:NOTJUSTYET, when I was able to prove it wasn’t. Now you saying my style of edit indicates that I may be using multiple accounts. I disagree with this; and I believe this is a guild for old users towards the new users; Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers.Also I created the draft; with the help of Tems (Nigerian singer) and Bankulli.--JudeJnr (talk) 06:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Information icon

Hello JudeJnr. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Oxlade (singer), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JudeJnr. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JudeJnr|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 Celestina007 (talk) 23:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Celestina007:, If declaring COI, would result to you reviewing this draft in goodwill. I will declare this draft in WP:Goodfaith as a COI editor because I have interest in the subject. His notability wasn’t built on his affiliation with Davido or Drake for sharing his breakthrough song.--JudeJnr (talk) 08:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
your knowledge on policy and guideline is pretty good for an 8 day old I must say, quite enviable precocious talents you got there young fella, lol honestly, you are piss poor at UPE & you just gotta find you a new career path as this is clearly not working for you. At this rate You just gonna get indef blocked for being disruptive & violating our WP:PAID policy as you have done before under different accounts. Consider this a fair warning, if I have to warn you again, you’d land yourself a block for UPE. Celestina007 (talk) 12:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You Celestina007, good faith is written in the COI terms. I didn’t have to know that, but the link above you shared took me to that page and also enlighten be. If you check my contributions and read, you will see a recent edit where I learnt a little how COI works. Being here for 8 days doesn’t mean I can’t learn something new in 8 days. On WP:Draft I learnt how to submit, tag and verify my draft is ready before submitting. That was learnt when I started my draft.--JudeJnr (talk) 12:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oxlade (singer) (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Celestina007 (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oxlade (singer) (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Binge submitting a declined draft over and again without addressing the notability issues is an utter waste of time. I have also come to realize a potential COI, that(if it applies) has to be disclosed as well.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Celestina007 (talk) 12:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JudeJnr&oldid=1010992281"